Gun Restrictions Leads To Crimes

Good Essays
Are guns associated with crimes? Do guns necessary leads to crimes? If so, will more guns restrictions stop crimes and protect the citizens? Gun control, like many other topics, is a touchy topic where many people believe there should be more restrictions while others oppose the idea. In answering these questions, we need to investigate all viewpoints, compare, and analyze them. Some people believe that having gun laws will prevent criminals from getting guns; however, this law will also mean law abiding citizens will not have access to gun. Some people also believe that gun control will have minimal effects because if criminals wanted guns, they will get them regardless of the law. Even though guns are considered a lethal weapon and therefore very dangerous, we need to educate ourselves and learn how to manage them properly so that we can acheive its benefits or use it strictly for their purpose. Guns are not the problem, people are. Gun laws will only prevent law abiding citizens from getting guns to protect themselves from both legally and illegally armed criminals.
People often misunderstand the purpose of the Second Amendment. Many anti gun argue that the Second Amendment is out dated
…show more content…
The Second Amendment is in placed to protect all citizens from a tyrannical government. It is necessary for citizens to defend themselves in the case where the government turn on them, which has happened before in history. The arguement where guns should be banned because it can injure and kill innocent people is not valid; Chicago, the city with the stirtest gun control law, has the most gun deaths in America. Taking guns away will only prevent law abiding citizens from defending themselves from criminals and will not stop criminals from getting guns. Instead of imposing new gun laws, the government should enforce the already existing laws and educate its citizens about the responsibilities of owning a

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Why Guns Are Bad

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Your normal citizen doesn't have drugs, but bad people do. If guns are taken away, only the good people won't have them. ( Ronald Cruise). The gun control law is not being followed by some citizens, therefore more rules are being added to the law towards gun control a good background check will keep the guns out of people who should not have them to prevent criminal, drug dealers, domestic abusers, and mentally ill people from carrying the gun. therefore, people who do not follow this law should face consequences, for example, time in jail or police taking gun licene from guns holder.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    But, it’s important to get guns out of the hands of the people who wish to do harm to others or who are very likely to do harm to others. Stricter gun laws should make it harder for people that don’t need guns to get them, keeping Americans safe from gun violence. The United States will not be able to get rid of its 301 million guns, but if the flow of the firearms is restricted, then the country will be a more secure place as a…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis Essay Gun control in America has always been an issue. With problems coming up such as school shootings, teens getting their hands on their parents’ guns, and kids accidentally shooting themselves, people want laws set forward to limit the use of guns. In “End the Gun Epidemic in America,” The Editorial Board talks about how they want stricter gun laws because no one really needs to own a gun. The Editorial Board believes there should be stricter gun laws in the United States because they think it’s too easy to get your hand on a gun and possibly injure someone. Their use of pathos throughout the article makes the audience want there to be stricter gun laws, but the use of logos and ethos is weak.…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Why Is Gun Control Bad

    • 1702 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Its is important to know that guns do need to have some restrictions to a certain extent, but not to the point where it disarms our citizens who obey the law. Gun control cannot stop guns from getting into the hands of criminals, they will manage a way of getting guns to their desire. What seems seems to be the problem is gun control because it only hurts the ones who obey the law. We as Americans need to protect the rights of this nation to be free, gun control affects our citizens and not the…

    • 1702 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    For example, gun control laws interfere with a citizens right to self defense. These laws would also deny citizens their sense of safety. The NRA reported that often guns are used in self defense because police can not be everywhere all the time. Gun ownership is also an old and hard to change tradition protected by the Second Amendment. Also people are naive to think that gun control laws will prevent criminals from obtaining guns.…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The law to take away guns would not affect criminals, because criminals do not follow the law. Without guns for protection, the law-abiding citizens would be helpless to defend themselves against the criminals who would now be the only citizens with guns. The law that was meant to protect would actually lead to the victimization and possible death of law-abiding citizens. This victimization of the defenseless is even prevalent if the criminal does not have a gun. The government of the United Kingdom banned handguns, and over the following years, not only did murder go up, but more people were being killed by knives and strangulation…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This belief, however, is disproved by evidence. If guns are made illegal to own, law-abiding citizens will then turn in their guns. However, those who wish to do harm with their guns would keep their guns illegally. Therefore, these laws not only take guns away from responsible citizens, but give those who wish to keep their guns an unfair advantage if they were to attack another person (ProCon.org). Gun control laws are ineffective and should not be in present in today’s society.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    People should have the right to protect themselves, their families, and their property, however there are guns that can be purchased that have no real purpose unless you are planning a mass shooting. Of course some people just purchase these because they believe they are cool. I agree that these should be illegal to sell. Gun control would be great, but I believe it is an impossible goal. In a perfect world we would be able to get control, or better yet never have invented such a violent weapon.…

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The reason why we should not have stricter gun control law is because the problem is not adding more gun laws that will not solve the solution to why we have deaths or guns falling to the wrong people. With or without gun control law; criminals will still get a hold of one. Instead of trying to enforce more gun control laws, we should focus on educating the people about the safety of gun usage and by owning a gun does have the advantages of protect not only oneself, but your…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Just because there may be an interrelationship, or correlation, between two concepts does not mean that one is necessarily going to lead to the other. Establishing strict gun laws would put unnecessary restrictions on law-abiding citizens; therefore, they should not be enacted. Stringent gun laws do not always effectively prevent crime as criminals will still have their own connections to a gun in order to commit a crime; people need to stop playing the blame game and become educated about guns and the safety regarding them. Laws are put into place to give order; not to take away a basic right, such as the right to bare arms. If the right to bare arms were to be taken away, what would be taken away next, if that doesn’t solve the “problem”?…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays