Everyday there are a number of gun related injuries that happen all across the US. About 580 people are either injured or killed by guns each day (Nick Wing 7). Gun control is the effort to limit the possession and use of guns. The gun control debate may be a standout amongst the most imperative issues in our general public. The U.S. Supreme Court decided in 2008 that the second Amendment controls the administration 's capacity to ban handguns. A few republican politicians are enthusiastic about gun ownership and settle on voting choices construct upon in light of this issue alone; subsequently, the general population we choose into office directly influence our lives. A couple of republican legislators have an in number confidence in the
…show more content…
That 's why it is very crucial that the government proposes laws that are more stringent than they are right now. There are several cities that have proposed handgun bans in the past, and the outcomes were not promising. On September 24, 1976, Washington, D.C. placed a ban on all handguns; the ban was later overturned on June 26, 2008. Under the regulations of this law, nobody other than a cop was allowed to carry a handgun. Authors Agresti and Smith (2010) state that “during the years in which the D.C. handgun ban and trigger lock law were in effect, the Washington, D.C. murder rate averaged 73% higher than it was at the outset of the law, while the U.S. murder rate averaged 11% lower.”(James D. Agresti 29). Evidently, banning the handguns in D.C. did not lessen the measure of killings and violations that were committed, and the quantity of homicides increased drastically. Gun control supporters would argue these facts by saying that the data is misleading, and that it is important to consider other factors, for example, the changing of times and in addition the increase of medication and technology. This is troublesome for them to clarify. A second example of the ineffectiveness of just banning handguns is that of Chicago, Illinois. In 1982, Chicago passed a prohibition on all handguns, aside from those that were …show more content…
I believe we need to lower crime rates in America, but people should look at the problem realistically, and make plans or laws that could or would work. If guns could be more regulated by banning certain weapons, and requiring a more in depth background check, then gun violence in the United States would start decreasing. Also, if already existing laws were enforced by the government and penalties were to be stricter for those who disobey them. If the country would agree on certain legislation, then this country would be a much safer
That 's why it is very crucial that the government proposes laws that are more stringent than they are right now. There are several cities that have proposed handgun bans in the past, and the outcomes were not promising. On September 24, 1976, Washington, D.C. placed a ban on all handguns; the ban was later overturned on June 26, 2008. Under the regulations of this law, nobody other than a cop was allowed to carry a handgun. Authors Agresti and Smith (2010) state that “during the years in which the D.C. handgun ban and trigger lock law were in effect, the Washington, D.C. murder rate averaged 73% higher than it was at the outset of the law, while the U.S. murder rate averaged 11% lower.”(James D. Agresti 29). Evidently, banning the handguns in D.C. did not lessen the measure of killings and violations that were committed, and the quantity of homicides increased drastically. Gun control supporters would argue these facts by saying that the data is misleading, and that it is important to consider other factors, for example, the changing of times and in addition the increase of medication and technology. This is troublesome for them to clarify. A second example of the ineffectiveness of just banning handguns is that of Chicago, Illinois. In 1982, Chicago passed a prohibition on all handguns, aside from those that were …show more content…
I believe we need to lower crime rates in America, but people should look at the problem realistically, and make plans or laws that could or would work. If guns could be more regulated by banning certain weapons, and requiring a more in depth background check, then gun violence in the United States would start decreasing. Also, if already existing laws were enforced by the government and penalties were to be stricter for those who disobey them. If the country would agree on certain legislation, then this country would be a much safer