Background Checks Essay

Improved Essays
About 8.3 million background checks on ammunition sales were conducted nationwide in 2005, according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin. Presently, many people feel insecure, as if they are unsafe, so they look to purchase a gun to have a sense of security. Others desire a gun for recreational purposes. Background checks are happening on a daily basis, and they assisted to prevent nearly 132,000 criminals potentially obtaining guns in 2005. And, according to the Pew Research Center, gun homicide rates are down 49% since the 1993 peak. Many believe that background checks are necessary, and aid to prevent future attacks on the general public. These checks still need to be enforced, as they are preventing our nation from danger, however, …show more content…
They convict innocent Americans from obtaining ammunition, and is a violation of the second amendment, because background checks limit the amount of people allowed to purchase guns, despite the amendment stating that everyone has a right to attain some form of ammunition. Federal law only requires licensed gun dealers to conduct background checks. That means that millions of guns are exchanged each year without a check—most often online or at gun shows through unlicensed private sellers. “The Virginia Tech shooter, who killed 32 people [2007], was banned from buying guns because a court found him severely mentally ill. But he passed a background check because his records never made it into the system.” (Everytown). Because the shooter purchased his ammunition through a private sale, the FBI had no account of his records. This private enterprise cannot be regulated, and therefore guns may be sold to anyone, even criminals, without anyone ever knowing, putting unknowing lives at risk. Guns can always come to the wrong hands at the end of the road however. They can be transported and shared to a point where a criminal has reached the guns. “Most criminals know this [background checks] and either use friends or relatives with no criminal record to buy guns for them (an illegal straw purchase), steal guns, or buy illicit guns from other criminals. Some gangs even have community guns they all …show more content…
Background checks are good for the nation because they ultimately prevent crime from occurring, saving potentially hundreds, even thousands of lives, however, background checks can also be tedious, and inspire private enterprises from arising, also creating a network of gun sharing, somewhat how a library operates. Background checks are good for the security of the nation. Crime has decreased, and guns are being sold more responsibly. However, few extra measures should be taken. Rather than fund more and more unnecessary gun laws, creating more controversy, and spending money for things that may not even work, the United States must to persist on, and enforce the current system, because so far, it is operating

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Within the Charleston Loophole, a person prohibited from buying a gun, like a domestic abuser or a felon, is allowed to buy one if a background check isn't completed within three business days (2016a). Senator Clinton determined the alleged Charleston shooter, who killed nine innocent people, had a federal criminal record and was able to purchase a gun strictly because of this loophole (2016a). According to the Clinton administration, “background checks reduce gun trafficking, reduce the lethality of domestic violence, and reduce unlawful gun transfers to dangerous individuals” (2016a). A recent Chicago Sun-Times column, written by Rev. Jesse Jackson described the transformation of guns in the following disturbing terms: "weapons designed for the purpose of mass killing in war are available for purchase at gun shows, online and at many gun stores. These weapons are powerful enough to stop trains or strafe planes that are landing or taking off.…

    • 2085 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Only twelve percent of the felons obtained their guns from a licensed dealer legally. The remaining obtained them through family, friends, and on the streets. Almost all the juvenile offenders received their guns through friends, theft, or loans from adults. Guns on the black market are hard to locate, and if they were they are extremely expensive. People pay brokers a fee to locate firearms, but it isn’t always a guarantee that they will be successful in finding a firearm.…

    • 1110 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Background checks identify individuals who are ineligible to purchase firearms and prevent those persons from obtaining them, making them a key element in preventing tragic and unnecessary gun deaths in the United States” (“Background Check Procedures”). This justifies that background checks are effective ways to limit high-risk people the access to guns. When a citizen decides to purchase a gun from any federally licensed firearms dealer, they will enter the customer’s name and information into the National Instant Criminal Background Check System, or NICS. Background checks are an important safety guard between selling a gun to a secure or potentially dangerous…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While this may be true, background checks can save lots of lives by preventing dangerous people from having guns and killing a mass amount of people. Officials say that even though mass shootings won’t completely stop, with better background checks there will be “tighter control” that can save “a significant number of lives” (Rosenwald). An example would be the Virgina Tech shooting in 2007 when 32 people were killed but, weeks before Seung-Hui Cho was banned from buying a firearm because a court found him to be “severely mentally ill.” Yet he still passed a background check only because his records never made it into the system (“Background Checks”). This proves that a stronger background check can save more lives and keep a better control over who has a gun.…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    So what is wrong with having background checks for gun ownership? According to the New York Times, 74% of National Rifle Association members (one of the largest pro-gun lobbyists) support universal background checks for gun ownership (Kristof). This number does not include 87% of non-NRA gun owners who also…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The accusations that background checks will not treat the issue because criminals will not consent to a background check are false. The purpose of a check is to prevent those who are not supposed to purchase guns, from legally owning them. Lacking these checks, there is no method to guarantee that gun distributers are obeying the law and not allowing ineligible people to purchase firearms, (Sager). “About eighty-percent of the people surveyed, in a study pertaining to gun control laws, support background checks before a gun purchase can be made. Around seventy-seven percent of these same…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Background checks will not reduce the amount of gun crime. The media needs to stop making people who own guns sound like bad people. (Norell, 1) People need to realize that it’s criminals illegally possessing guns, not people legally buying guns, that are committing the majority of crimes with guns. (Goddard, 1) Gun crime is on the rise but, putting more and more regulation on legal gun owners is not slowing it down. Works Cited "Adult poll respondents' views on gun control laws and gun ownership, selected years, 1993-2007."…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun control laws give too much power to the government. The second Amendment is not there for duck hunting or small game. Its there to protect the citizens from the government, criminals and foreign invaders. The founding fathers didn't want the future citizens to be under the tyranny like they did. Background checks are a direct invasion of privacy because it requires the government to keep a file of what guns you buy,your address, and other stuff.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Why Is Gun Control Bad

    • 1615 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Lastly, all states require a gun license prior to the purchase of a gun.” (“Buying a Gun”) All states also require a background check and a clean legal record.” and are pretty basic as it shows. It should be required for people who want to get a gun to go through a multiple amount of tests that can prove that they won’t have even the slightest thought of misusing it even though a person has a clean background. Even though this is rare, it can happen when a person meets all the requirements that are required now and later on may go on to murder someone.…

    • 1615 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Argumentative Essay On Gun Control

    • 1777 Words
    • 8 Pages
    • 12 Works Cited

    As the country with the largest stockpile of privately owned firearms, we aren’t doing much to prevent them from falling on the wrong hands. According to The Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act convicted felons, drug users and abusers, and mentally ill people are prohibited from purchasing or possessing firearms (FBI). But, convicted criminals and mentally ill people are acquiring firearms without any difficulty and are using them for the wrong reasons mainly because of weak laws that regulate the sale of firearms. Firearm sales in gun shows are not regulated by the FBI and buyers are not required to go through any kind of background checks at the time of purchase. According to a report by the UC Davis Violence Prevention Research Program titled “Inside Gun Shows: What Goes on When Everybody Thinks Nobody’s Watching”, it is reported that more than forty percent of gun sales occur privately without any regulations.…

    • 1777 Words
    • 8 Pages
    • 12 Works Cited
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Importance Of Gun Control

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 8 Works Cited

    62% of the 31,000 deaths caused by a gun are suicides (Cornell 2). According to Arthur L. Kellerman, MD, “residents of homes where a gun is present are 5 times more likely to experience a suicide than residents of homes without guns” (A Case for Gun Control). I have experienced the effects of suicide within my own family. One month ago, my cousin Marisa committed suicide. She was 26 years old and had been diagnosed with schizophrenia a few years prior to the tragic incident.…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 8 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Federal law sets the minimum standards for firearm regulation in the United States, but individual states have their own laws, some of which provide further restrictions, others which are more lenient. Some states, including Idaho, Alaska, and Kansas have passed laws designed to circumvent federal policies, but the Constitution establishes the superiority of federal law. With that being said, Senior-level state and local government officials are very much in favor of universal background checks as a resolution to gun…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The government doesn’t handle background checks properly and they…

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun control is an extremely controversial topic that has spawned a tremendous amount of debate over the past few years. Most of the debates occur when there are mass shootings at schools, churches, or other public places. Mallory Simons is a writer and senior producer of online presentations for CNN. She wrote Gun Debate: Where is the Middle Ground on January 31, 2013 and it appeared on CNN.com the same day. In her article she discussed recent acts of gun violence and the effect they have had on the gun control debate.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Gun control can help stop the bad guy from ever getting a gun, Guns are often obtained in areas of the country where it is easy to buy large numbers of weapons without background checks (ex. southern states) and then transported to be sold in the areas where guns are restricted. Police forces are groups of organized and trained professionals that uphold order in society—it is their job to ensure that society does not devolve into a state where every person needs a gun. Criminals, by definition, don’t follow the law and tailoring the legal gun application process for the activities of those who don’t follow the law is simply foolish. People who are not allowed to buy guns certainly hate background checks, but this is because such checks limit their ability to buy guns legally. Guns have no social benefit and a removal of guns from society would not have the negative effects that a removal of cars would have.…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics