In the film of 12 Angry Men. there is a boy who is being accused of killing his father. While the case is brought to court, twelve jurors debate whether or not the boy is guilty. Throughout the film there were many arguments over the evidence, why they thought the boy was guilty/not guilty, or why someone else was wrong about what they thought the boy was. By the end of the film the boy was found not guilty.
In the beginning of the film they all first took a vote on whether the boy was guilty or not. When they took the vote it was eleven guilty, one not guilty. In order to find the defendant guilty or not guilty, it must be twelve to nothing. Many of the jurors were upset by this and thought that Juror #8 was blind to all the evidence that
In the beginning of the film they all first took a vote on whether the boy was guilty or not. When they took the vote it was eleven guilty, one not guilty. In order to find the defendant guilty or not guilty, it must be twelve to nothing. Many of the jurors were upset by this and thought that Juror #8 was blind to all the evidence that