Since GST (Good and Services Tax) has been available by government to implement it to the public, the reformation of GST seems to initiate a couple of issues. Those issues may include a political, or even economic aspect and many other issues. Yet today, there is a lot of argument, critics and fact about GST reform and its implications found in the Australian media. This essay will review some of the findings from the articles that are related to the GST reform and why GST holds a really important part to the public or even the internal of the government itself when GST is being reformed. When GST is reformed, it creates a direct impact to the public or the internal government, generates pros and contras, which may leads to not reducing the
…show more content…
I believe that focusing and reforming the company tax rather than GST reform should contribute to the more effective outcome.
All activities in GST reform may result on a different impact on the different area of public. One of the example comes from Hayley Sorensen that stated potential changes to the GST rate to 15% or widened to apply to fresh food will excessively influence salary laborers and their families. Furthermore, Hayley also stated that when there is a GST to the fresh food, it would block the people and families to conduct a healthy eating habit and creating more obesity issues.1 In this scenario, the GST reform impact directly to the families in a form of their nessesities. It seems that GST should not be applied to the fresh food area of goods. When GST is charged to the fresh food, people tend to buy un-fresh food that may leads to the health problem such as obesity …show more content…
The public issues includes making the fresh food taxable that may leads to unhealthy eating habbit. Meanwhile, the political issues includes the unfair WA position in the distribution of tax revenue system. Moreover, a cut of the low incomers is found to be uneffective because thebenefit is neither or nor received, so it would initiate other social problems rather than solving the problem. It has been found too that the government are trying to reform GST because there is a several political issues and a GST reform may lead to more high revenue than reforming the company tax. A company tax reform is needed to balance those companies who are found not paying tax and it will reduce the government deficit and may lead to
I believe that focusing and reforming the company tax rather than GST reform should contribute to the more effective outcome.
All activities in GST reform may result on a different impact on the different area of public. One of the example comes from Hayley Sorensen that stated potential changes to the GST rate to 15% or widened to apply to fresh food will excessively influence salary laborers and their families. Furthermore, Hayley also stated that when there is a GST to the fresh food, it would block the people and families to conduct a healthy eating habit and creating more obesity issues.1 In this scenario, the GST reform impact directly to the families in a form of their nessesities. It seems that GST should not be applied to the fresh food area of goods. When GST is charged to the fresh food, people tend to buy un-fresh food that may leads to the health problem such as obesity …show more content…
The public issues includes making the fresh food taxable that may leads to unhealthy eating habbit. Meanwhile, the political issues includes the unfair WA position in the distribution of tax revenue system. Moreover, a cut of the low incomers is found to be uneffective because thebenefit is neither or nor received, so it would initiate other social problems rather than solving the problem. It has been found too that the government are trying to reform GST because there is a several political issues and a GST reform may lead to more high revenue than reforming the company tax. A company tax reform is needed to balance those companies who are found not paying tax and it will reduce the government deficit and may lead to