Summary: Define And Explain The Significance Of Grundnorm

Superior Essays
1. Define and explain the significance of grundnorm. Essentially a grundnorm is an ordinance that states follow to make contracts between each other (J.G. Rumsey, International Law Lecture 2)(Murphy, 11). The significance of this term is that it helps to establish what states can put down on their treaties, so that they have something to refer to and go off of when making such a contract.

2. Define and explain the significance of pacta sunt servanda. The definition of pact sunt servanda is adhering to the contract states signed to have with each other (Murphy, 11). The direct translation from Latin is “an agreement must be kept” (Murphy, 11). The importance behind a term like this is that by engaging in this act it ensures that states
…show more content…
Define and explain the significance of jus cogens.

The definition of jus cogens is that nations cannot reverse or go against what they have already decided upon in their agreements or contracts (Murphy, 12, 96). According to Murphy, the Latin translation is “peremptory norms” (12, 96). By having jus cogens it gives a sense of security to states/nation, by stating that the other party is not going to go off on their own even after signing such a contract and do what they want.

4. Define and explain the significance of jus gentium.

Just gentium is known as the rules that Roman’s abide by and use in their legal system (Murphy, 21). The significance behind term is that because Romans had such a strong culture of law they developed their own ideas and rules behind how it should advance and this led to the term being created (Murphy, 19-21).

5. Define and explain the significance of legal personality.

Legal personality is the persona of how an organization acts as being seen as something that can play a part or have a part in international law (Noyes, Dickinson, Janis, 329-330) (Murphy, 49). This term is important because without out it organizations could never be seen or take part in international
…show more content…
First, was the rise of due process (Noyes, Dickinson, Janis, 37). Before the Nuremberg trials, due process had conflicting and elongated demands that a person could be subject to (Noyes, Dickinson, Janis, 37). However, the lesson they learned after was that due process was a central aspect to international law, which overturned a lot of what due process was like before the trials (Noyes, Dickinson, Janis, 38-39). Another thing that was acquired from the Nuremberg trials was the creation of the International Criminal Court (ICC) (Noyes, Dickinson, Janis, 42). Since before the trials there was no set way to try war criminals, the creation of the IMF helped to lead and pave the way for the ICC (Noyes, Dickinson, Janis, 42-43). It also allowed international law to try individuals who deserved to be (Noyes, Dickinson, Janis,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The recognition of the Roman supreme authority is impressive. The reason for written law is a means of protecting the people from one another and the supremacy of the State. It is of paramount importance to many countries because the Roman’s invented the concept of civil law (“…Roman law is a legal system originating in Europe, intellectualized within the framework of late Roman law, and whose most prevalent feature is that its core principles are codified into a referable system which serves as the primary source of law”), requiring various codes of law and codes of well-proportioned…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Everyone and their mother knows about the Roman Empire, but do they know about Rome's eastern successor, Byzantium? The Byzantine Empire was originally the eastern half of the failing Roman Empire. Justinian ruled Byzantium in its most powerful age. Justinian was a powerful leader, and those who followed never lived up to him. Byzantium shared many similarities with the Roman Empire.…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Nuremberg and Tokyo trials were held to punish those that were involved in war crimes. The Nuremberg trials sought to punish “not only the guards and others who carried out the orders to commit atrocities, but also the leaders who planned the atrocities and gave orders (page 197).” This is important because individuals who were simply following government orders would still be punished. The Tokyo trials convicted military and government leaders, and the trials also exposed “many acts of brutality (page 198)”. The Nuremberg trials led the Allies to establish the International Military Tribunal.…

    • 134 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reconciliation In Rwanda

    • 1968 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Government’s Failure to Facilitate Reconciliation in Post-Genocide Rwanda After the genocide of 1994, Rwanda had strict ethnic divides between the Hutus, Tutsis, and Twa. Some 800,000 Tutsis and moderate Hutus were murdered, and the population was torn apart without much guidance to initiate the healing process. Despite implementing various legal and cultural efforts to help the country recover, the Rwandan government did not do enough to help said process; there are still societal divides and forced isolations left in the wake of the genocide. The International Court Tribunal of Rwanda (ICTR) was inefficient and wasted both time and money in trying perpetrators of the genocide; its incompetence prolonged the freedom the criminals enjoyed…

    • 1968 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Nuremberg Trials were the first trials in history to seek justice against an entire regime for aggressive war crimes. They took place immediately after World War II ended, the indictment happened on October 18th, 1945. The horrible war crimes included invading other nations, violating the Treaty of Versailles and the most horrific crimes against humanity. The Nuremberg Trials prosecuted twenty one defendants, all of whom were Nazi officers and part of six major Nazi organizations. The trials did not serve justice to the victims or the heartless inhumane crimes against them.…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As early as 1942, the Allies learned from various sources in Nazi-occupied Europe that the Germans were carrying out many atrocities against Jews, prisoners of war, and other groups. On October 7 of that year, the United States and Great Britain established the War Crimes Commission, which made lists of German war criminals. In the Moscow Declaration of November 1, 1943, the United States, Great Britain, and the Soviet Union affirmed that they intended to bring German war criminals to justice (“War criminals”). After the defeat of Nazi Germany in May, 1945, American, British, Soviet, and French leaders met at the London Conference to make more detailed plans for the trials.…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    On December 17, 1942, several countries, including the United States and Great Britain, identified the law as an avenue for pursuing justice on behalf of individuals persecuted in the Holocaust, resolving to prosecute war criminals responsible for the mass murder of civilian populations (United States Holocaust Memorial Museum). From 1945 to 1946, the Allied powers sentenced 22 war criminals for their actions, yet the process of understanding crimes against humanity and empowering their victims extends beyond legal ramifications (United States Holocaust Memorial Museum). Labeling the Holocaust as a stain in human history is an understatement; the massacre of 6 million individuals, each bearing a story, familial lineage, and personal aspirations,…

    • 1642 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    At the time, there was no precedent on how an international trial can be carried out, which is what made this concept very unique. Initially, the Nuremberg trials gained popularity but as the trials were underway, it took a long period of time to complete resulting in the loss of interest from many people. Interest in the Nuremberg trials spiked once more after the completion of the trials as the decisions were taken. Surprisingly, many people reacted positively to the decisions and actions that were taken by the allied forces to create and…

    • 2028 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wilson Fourteen Points

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages

    What changes would wilson's fourteen points have made in a way European nations and the U.S conducted their affairs? Why would these ideas lead to greater peace and security? I. Open covenants of peace, openly arrived at, after which there shall be no private international understandings of any kind but diplomacy shall proceed always frankly and in the public view. II. Absolute freedom of navigation upon the seas, outside territorial waters, alike in peace and in war, except as the seas may be closed in whole or in part by international action for the enforcement of international covenants.…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What POWs Can Teach Americans Both the Allies and the Axis powers committed many horrific crimes during World War II – most of which deserve to be known of. However, perhaps one of the most important things that everyone should know of is how prisoners of war (POWs) were treated in each country. In America, the military went above-and-beyond the standards to make sure all Nazi POWs were comfortable and treated humanely. However, it became evident that the treatment that Americans gave Nazi POWs was not being reflected in Nazi Germany. The American people were outraged at the atrocious acts committed by Hitler and his regime, and a congressional investigation was launched into the treatment of Nazi POWs.…

    • 1110 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From the time of the foundation of their culture the Romans stood out because of their austerity and sense of moral rigor. The original Romans adhered to the Mos Maiorum, which literally meant the ways of the elders. The Mos Maiorum was an unwritten law that was intended to function in accordance to the written law. The Romans structured all aspects of their life according to this code from the military and the private life, to the government and other social conventions. Arguably Rome’s greatest contribution to modern society was her form of rovernment and her laws.…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Case Study Legal Pluralism

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Introduction I will present how the Supreme Court of Canada handles the competition between normative orders. This paper will consist of a brief summary of the case, the decisions of the judges and what drove them to this decision alongside a mixture of Brian Tamanaha’s (author of Understanding Legal Pluralism: Past to Present, Local to Global) point of view concerning this case in an indirect manner. I will also answer three complicated questions concerning this case. First of all, in order to better understand this case, we will have to have basic knowledge concerning this case. Starting with the appellants, which are the Sikh boy (Gurbaj Singh Multani, in this text will referred to as G) and his father (Balvir Singh Multani, will be refer…

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There appears to be two different ways of looking at the above statement. It can be argued that World War II was a continuation of World War I. Or, it could also be argued that World War II was not a continuation, but that World War I merely "set the stage" for World War II. After much consideration, there really is a fine line between these two situations. As there were many ways in which World War I actually led to World War II, this argument will take the position that "World War II was a continuation of World War I". In fact, it could be claimed that World War II was actually "Act II" of the Great War.…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Advantages and Disadvantages of The Corpus Juris Civilis Roman Law is the law of ancient Rome it is known for the inheritance which the Romans left us, Roman law is highly important as it influenced the world especially the western world and it is the most developed out of all the systems of the past. In addition it is the first pediment of law and society and its history can be traced over a long period. The latter, provides the foundation for numerous legal systems and this is reflected in Tony Honore's words who is a British lawyer and jurists known for his work in Roman law . Honore said that : "The European Union of the Treaty of Rome is not a revival of the Roman Empire. The inheritance from Rome and of Roman Law has however renewed…

    • 1433 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction : Separate legal personality (SLP) is the fundamental principle of corporate law. Establishing the foundation for the existence of the company and its functions is the most profound and firm foundation in the jurisprudence of companies. By contrast, the SLP has historically experienced many disorders, one of the most common in and between jurisdictions. However, this principle, which was created in the Salomon case against Salomon, continues to prevail, and is usually celebrated as constituting the core of the English corporate law not only, but also in the system of international trade law.…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays