Group Presentation Response Paper

Through the overall groups presentation, each group uses different ethical theories to analyze the cases which gives the audience a more intuitive and comprehensive understanding. I think each group’s speech is very successful which also gave the audience a lot of inspirations. I would show my evaluation of the speeches though this presentation response paper.
In the first round of presentation, there are three groups respectively analyzed the case of Enron, Walmart and Wells Fargo and each group uses different ethical theories to analyze the case. In my point of view, I think the team which evaluated the Enron case did a good job. Because I was a member of Enron case group. It is easier and effective for me to compared with other cases and I did a deeper investigation into the Enron case. After other team members used different ethical theories to analyze the Enron case. I got much inspirations about the case itself. To be fairly, the team members described …show more content…
In my opinion, I think the team analysis Coca-Cola case did a good job. Coca-Cola as a large company with factories and build a huge influence around world. In this case presentation, I found out that the one who showed Bentham's utilitarianism theory brought me a deep impression. Although Coca-Cola set up factories in India, this created more job opportunities and the factory also made people feel happy. However, in order to increase production efficiency, the factory collects large amounts of groundwater resources. This behavior has caused damage to the ecological environment. Through out their presentation, I realized the importance of protecting the environment while pursuing profit. The speaker's analysis of the Coca-Cola case made me realize the importance of the ecological environment and the unethical behavior of the Coca-Cola Company. So, I think this group is more