Group Norms In 12 Angry Men

Decent Essays
Various norms can be seen amply within the jury group throughout the entirety of the movie 12 Angry Men. One example of a group norm is every juror is expected to express their judgment and engage in the discussion. Everyone within the group must come to a unanimous decision on whether the accused is truly guilty, this requires the full participation of each juror. Juror number eight even goes through and asks the opinions of those members who don’t openly express their opinions, ensuring everyone participates. Nevertheless, another group norm is the initial belief that the young man on trial is guilty. Almost everyone in the jury votes on a guilty verdict, and think it’s absurd when juror number eight says otherwise. Therefore, I believe it

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    In Reginald Rose’s Twelve Angry men, a 19 year old boy is on trial for the murder of his father. 12 jurors hold the fate of his life in their hands, by deciding whether or not he is guilty. They decide this by the use of reasonable doubt, looking at the evidence given for the case, and the witnesses testimonies. The boy is considered a “slum” or to have grown up in the slums ; a very populated area with run-down buildings and people that may have had, or have a financial burden, or don’t have the money to take care of their families and have a “nice” house at the same time. Due to prejudice from some jurors and sympathy from others, and the general diversity between the them, you can put yourself in their positions, and decide whether he is…

    • 146 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “...It's a crash course in those passages of the Constitution that promise defendants a fair trial and the presumption of innocence. " 12 Angry Men" never states whether the defendant is innocent or guilty. It is about whether the jury has a reasonable doubt about his guilt.’” quoted by, well known critic Roger Ebert. The whole concept of Reasonable Doubt is that you should not vote guilty if there is any "reasonable doubt", no matter how sure other jurors are. In the book 12 Angry Men by Reginald Rose, one of the many themes is reasonable doubt.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the play “Twelve Angry Men” there is a lot of prejudice. It mainly shows that people like to judge other people without any actual knowledge. Prejudice is still a major issue in the world and it will always be one. People like to judge others before even getting to know them. It is bad to be prejudiced before even trying something out or meeting someone.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At the beginning of the deliberation, Juror 8 is one of the few members of the jury feel sympathy because of his difficult childhood and his father’s continuous abuse and believes “That’s not a very good start” and thinks “maybe [the jury] owe him a few words” (13). Because feels sympathy towards the defendant and is passionate about giving him a fair trial. The first time the jury voted whether they believe the defendant is guilty or not guilty, all jurors except Juror 8 agreed to a guilty verdict. But before they voted a second time, Juror 8 said believes “there’s enough doubt to make us wonder whether he was there at all during the time the murder took place” (40) and as a result, two more jurors changed their vote to not guilty. Juror 8 is able to convince the other jurors to put aside their biases and prejudices opinions, and base their vote on the evidence presented during the…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Reflection

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The film “12 angry men” takes place in a courthouse in New York City. There is a trial going on involving a boy that is being charged for murdering his father. His sentence if guilty is the electric chair. The only thing that is deciding his fate, is the jury 's verdict. Guilty or non-guilty?…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Questions On 12 Angry Men

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages

    NAME: Swathesh Shetty DATE: 12/10/2015 Leadership for Global Citizenship Questionnaire for the movie “12 Angry Men” 1. In one or two sentences, answer the following: a) What is the purpose of the 12 person jury? The purpose of the 12 person jury is to unanimously decide whether the accused is guilty or not guilty of the offence for killing his father based on the data and evidence gathered during the trail in the court.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The motivation behind the opinions by juror 8 was lack of sufficient evidence, in his opinion, for a guilty…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Guilty or not guilty is a life threatening question for an eighteen-year-old boy in the film 12 Angry Men who has been tried for a first-degree murder. The eighteen-year-old boy has been accused of stabbing his own father and the case has been left in the hands of a twelve-man jury in which a guilty verdict mean the automatic death of the boy. Throughout the film, we are able to recognize various communication skills that the twelve individuals display. Leadership There are two types of leaders shown in this film. Since the beginning of the film juror number eight demonstrated to be an emergent leader by not being a follower even though he was the only one who pleaded not guilty and was willing to stand alone against the rest of the jury who pleaded guilty.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is uncommon to observe somebody who likes to be compelled to be some place or accomplish something they don 't have a longing to do. In, 12 Angry Men, we are given only that. Twelve men, of every single different backgrounds and experiences are told they must spend their own valuable time to judge a man on the premise of evidence that was presented to them. Gladding would call this kind of group an errand/work aggregate. This sort of group meets up to finish amass undertaking objectives.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The results are now 10 – 2 because juror #9 wants to hear what juror #8 has to say. After this, the jury goes thru an extended process were juror #8 presents a number of ideas and thoughts to take the evidence out, saying that it is not possible that the old man could have heard the boy’s screaming because the loudness of the train, or the he could not have seen the boy running out at the stairs because he can barely walks. Another vote is call out, and now the numbers are 6 –…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Thesis

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I feel strongly about that because the movie made me question what I believed to be true based on what other people said rather than forming my own thoughts. In the movie 12 Angry Men the twelve men at first sat down and took an outloud vote on whether they thought the defendant was guilty or not guilty. The law was that it had to be all twelve for one or the…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If it had not been for juror #8’s persistence in trying to persuade the other jurors that there was the possibility of doubt that the defendant did commit the murder I believe the defendant would have been found guilty within…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Week 2 Application Assignment: Group Dynamics and Group Stages In 1965, Bruce Tuckman developed one of the most influential models of “the developmental stages in a small group” (Bonebright, 2010, p. 111). It is a four stage model in which each stage needed to be completed in order to reach optimum group functioning. These stages were dubbed “forming”, “storming”, “norming”, “performing”. Later in 1977, he and Mary Ann Conover Jensen added “adjourning” as a fifth stage in his model (Bonebright, 2010).…

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Groupthink In 12 Angry Men

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A juror states that "Kids that live in the slums are all criminals" (12 Angry Men, 1957). Another example of groupthink during the movie is when the jury talk about how the boy's father beat him and would smack him around. The jury say "This boy has been hit so many times that violence is a sort of affair to him" and also one of the jurors says "I would beat him up too if he was my kid" (12 Angry Men, 1975). Throughout the movie groupthink decreased but that was after several hours of deliberation which is when the theory of dialogue comes in to…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    However, juror number eight was able to see past the stereotypes attached to the defendant. Free of bias and believed in fairness and justice. He said, “It doesn’t matter what kind of person he is…we owe him a few words is all.” He understood that prejudice endangers the process of a fair trial and makes a profound statement when he said, it’s very hard to keep personal prejudice out of a thing like this. The jury was able to overcome their prejudice and stereotyping to recognize the gravity of their purpose.…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays

Related Topics