Name of group member being evaluated Belinda Sebastiao
1. When the group met outside the laboratory, what percentage of the time was this person present?
When the group met outside the laboratory, Belinda was present 100%.
2. How often did this person lead the way for the group, both during the lab and outside the lab efforts?
Belinda did lead the way for the group a lot of times.
3. If this person had not been a member of your group, do you feel the group performance would have suffered? If so, in what ways and to what extent?
If Belinda was not part of our group, the group performance would sufer because she has many valuable ideas and she well understand the topic. Moreover, Belinda is good deriving equations.
4. What were this person’s strengths in …show more content…
How often were this person’s ideas or suggestions accepted by the group?
Onyinyechi’s ideas are accepted by the group almost all the times.
Name of group member being evaluated: Joshua Smelser
1. When the group met outside the laboratory, what percentage of the time was this person present?
When the group met outside the laboratory, Joshua was present 100%.
2. How often did this person lead the way for the group, both during the lab and outside the lab efforts?
Joshua did lead the way for the group almost all the times.
3. If this person had not been a member of your group, do you feel the group performance would have suffered? If so, in what ways and to what extent?
If Joshua was not part of our group, the group performance would suffer because Joshua fully participate to all group achievements and he is good in searching for additional information.
4. What were this person’s strengths in contributing to the group effort?
Joshua’s strength in contributing to the group looking for important informations and crucial equations in books, relating equations from books with the given information.
5. What were this person’s weaknesses in contributing to the group
1. When the group met outside the laboratory, what percentage of the time was this person present?
When the group met outside the laboratory, Belinda was present 100%.
2. How often did this person lead the way for the group, both during the lab and outside the lab efforts?
Belinda did lead the way for the group a lot of times.
3. If this person had not been a member of your group, do you feel the group performance would have suffered? If so, in what ways and to what extent?
If Belinda was not part of our group, the group performance would sufer because she has many valuable ideas and she well understand the topic. Moreover, Belinda is good deriving equations.
4. What were this person’s strengths in …show more content…
How often were this person’s ideas or suggestions accepted by the group?
Onyinyechi’s ideas are accepted by the group almost all the times.
Name of group member being evaluated: Joshua Smelser
1. When the group met outside the laboratory, what percentage of the time was this person present?
When the group met outside the laboratory, Joshua was present 100%.
2. How often did this person lead the way for the group, both during the lab and outside the lab efforts?
Joshua did lead the way for the group almost all the times.
3. If this person had not been a member of your group, do you feel the group performance would have suffered? If so, in what ways and to what extent?
If Joshua was not part of our group, the group performance would suffer because Joshua fully participate to all group achievements and he is good in searching for additional information.
4. What were this person’s strengths in contributing to the group effort?
Joshua’s strength in contributing to the group looking for important informations and crucial equations in books, relating equations from books with the given information.
5. What were this person’s weaknesses in contributing to the group