Griswold V. Connecticut Siehen Case Study

Superior Essays
Griswold v. Connecticut Siehien, 2

Griswold v. Connecticut: Right to Privacy

Jenna Siehien

Liberty High School

2A

The right to privacy for Americans, especially for married couples, was not an easy journey. Until the late 1960?s the right to privacy did not exist constitutionally. Due to the right to privacy not being clearly stated in the Constitution, it called for evaluation and interpretation of multiple amendments in order to reach that goal but first, an issue had to come up that questioned the right to privacy. In 1965 when two people were tried for something that they believe invaded the right to privacy and infringed on the 14th amendment (due process clause), they took the case right on up to the Supreme
…show more content…
Lee Buxton, a licensed physician, were tried for violating the state?s law. They were caught giving information, instruction, and other advice to married couples about birth control in order to prevent conception (Chicago-Kent Law, 2015). The actual law established by Connecticut in 1879 stated that "any person who uses any drug, medicinal article or instrument for the purposes of preventing conception shall be fined not less than forty dollars or imprisoned not less than sixty days? (McBride, 2006). The law also stated that, "any person who assists, abets, counsels, causes, hires or commands another to commit any offense may be prosecuted and punished as if he were the principle offender? (McBride, 2006). Griswold and Buxton were arrested and fined $100 each for going against this law. Both believed that this law was not in line with the U.S. Constitution and that it needed to be reviewed by the U.S. Supreme Court (McBride, …show more content…
Connecticut was taken before the Warren Court of the U.S. Supreme Court in March of 1965, with Griswold and Buxton as the appellants in the case. The Constitutional question being asked was, ?Does the Constitution protect the right of marital privacy against state restrictions on a couple's ability to be counseled in the use of contraceptives?? The justices together evaluated the Constitution focusing on the 1st, 3rd, 4th, 5th and 9th Amendments and on June 7, 1965, it was overall concluded, with a 7-2 majority opinion for Griswold, that these amendments together did create a general ?right to privacy? and it was found that Connecticut?s statue was indeed unconstitutional (Chicago-Kent Law, 2015). Justice Douglas, author of the majority opinion of the court, concluded that the Constitution does grant the right to privacy through the penumbras established by the 1st, 3rd, 4th, 5th and 9th Amendments. Justice Goldberg wrote the concurring opinion joined by Justice Harlan and Justice White. They believed that the relevant statue violated the Due Process clause of the 14th Amendment. The dissenting opinion came from Mr. Justice Black joined by Mr. Justice Stewart who both believed that the citizens of Connecticut should be aware of their rights under the ninth and tenth Amendments in order to convince their state representatives to repeal the law if it does not abide with their community standards ("Griswold v. Connecticut (B)," 2015) and (?Griswold v.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    They then continued with asking that the state forbid the district attorney from prosecuting any other women under the same law (Roe vs. Wade, 2011). After the review of the case and to the surprise of many, the judge panel ruled to the favor of McCorvey. Their analysis on the case stated that the law did violate her constitutional rights to privacy. Following the case, the court ruled that the ninth and fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution guaranteed privacy rights that were large enough to protect a women 's rights to having an abortion. Although the first request was granted the second was not as easy.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    New York, which stated that “freedoms of speech and the press were fundamental rights that were protected under the due process clause.” (Curtis 71) This interpretation was used to “protect other rights against state infringement.” (Atherton…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this case, students at Hazelwood East High School wrote two articles featuring subjects such as divorce and teen pregnancy (uscourts.gov). In this case, the principle of the school felt that the girls’ privacy would be infringed, and the father in the divorce article would be displayed in a biased way, so they decided not to publish the articles. The Supreme Court ruled 5­3 that the author’s 1st Amendment right was not infringed…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Connecticut and the Unenumerated Right of Privacy by David Helscher it discusses the issues about the Griswold v. Connecticut case. The main issues focuses on the unenumerated right of privacy retained by the people through the ninth amendment and the Bill of Rights. The concern made apparent in this article about the enumerated right of privacy is that, when the Bill of Rights were submitted for ratification there was a lack of Bill of Rights. People that were for and against the Bill of Rights feared that enumerating too little or too much privacy was going to result in negative outcomes. Before Griswold v. Connecticut the right to privacy was based on common tort, or personal injury action which provided for civil relief and remedies for intrusion upon an individual.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Prior to this case, it was looked down upon for people to be supporting abortions. However, after this case interpreted the Constitution to respect the privacy of people, and for the privacy to include abortions, many more people began to be supportive of supporting them. This demonstrates how judicial review has allowed the constitution to be and continue to be relevant through numerous…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The case of the District of Columbia v. Heller in 1976 is the case in question. When the case was presented to the Supreme Court, the opinion of the court came from Justice Antonin Scalia. In the case of District of Columbia v. Heller, the case was about examining as to whether if the Second Amendment was violated for Dick Anthony Heller. The District of Columbia decided to create a gun control law, which placed a ban on handguns and if individuals did own a gun it had to adhere strictly to their guidelines on owning a weapon.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme court relied on the Substantive Due Process clause to overturn the previous courts ruling and argued that the ruling violated the S. Due Process Clause, as opposed to the Equal Protections Clause. However, Justice Sandra Day O ' Connor argued in favor of the Equal Protections Clause to overturn the state laws against sodomy. The Court recognized that the privacy rights of consenting adults cannot be violated as this violates the Constitution. You would first file a complaint with the court and deliver a copy to the defendant. The…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    There have been many Supreme Court cases that have ruled in favor of one’s right of privacy such as Pierce v. Society of Sisters, Griswold v. Connecticut, Roe v. Wade and Lawrence v. Texas . In the case of Griswold v. Connecticut, in his majority opinion Supreme Court Justice William Douglas wrote, “[t]hough the Constitution does not explicitly protect a general right to privacy, the…

    • 1800 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Connecticut…”). When the Griswold v. Connecticut case was appealed to the Supreme Court in 1965, a seven to two decision determined that the Connecticut law was invalid and “discouraged marital sex for reasons other than procreation by criminalizing birth control counseling or the provision of contraceptives” (Markels). Because of this case, any married couples who wanted to use birth control were protected by their right to privacy provided in the Fourteenth Amendment (“Roe v. Wade:…”). Five years later, in 1970, the court case Eisenstadt v. Baird disputed whether the result of Griswold v. Connecticut should also be extended to any single woman. Violating a Massachusetts law that prohibited the distribution of contraceptives to unmarried persons and the distribution by those who were not authorized.…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Fourth Amendment Analysis

    • 1664 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” While the right to privacy is not explicitly stated in the Constitution, the Supreme Court (“The Court”) in Griswold v. Connecticut explained that the right to privacy is enshrined implicitly throughout the Constitution. They stated, “Specific guarantees in the Bill of Rights have penumbras, formed by emanations from those guarantees… [which] create zones of…

    • 1664 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Roe V. Wade Case

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The court’s decision for Jane Roe in the the Roe v. Wade case also made a huge impact on the United States. The Roe v. Wade case is still being argued about today, forty three years after the fact. This is because the Roe v. Wade case is about more than simply abortion rights. In the book Landmark Supreme court cases, it states, “The aftermath of Roe thus has been characterized not only by unfolding terms and conditions of the right of privacy, but by an intensified debate over the court’s function” (Lively 327). The decision was made because of the right of privacy, but it is hard to tell what matters fall under the category of private.…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The case of interest for this paper is the one of State v. Hickman in which the parents were ultimately convicted. The first amendment of the United…

    • 1523 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It’s vital that we continue to consider the Constitution as a statement of ideas and philosophies and not as an outline of strict facts. The right to privacy is seen nowhere in the Constitution, we only find it through interpretation of the Bill of Rights’ 3rd, 4th 14th amendments. This interpretation of privacy has led to the landmark case of Roe v. Wade and this interpretation is what will steer us into this new age of technology; cybersecurity, internet legislation. These things depend on a…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Later on in 1960 women began to fight more actively for their rights. On January 22,1973 the U.S Supreme Court in the Famous Reo V. Wade decision, stated the right of privacy founded in the 14 Amendment concept of personal liberty is broad enough to encompass a woman's decision whether or not to terminate her pregnancy. Abortions have been an American controversy for centuries, but at the end of the day it is now legal…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    • The U.S. Constitution never directly states that individuals have the right to privacy it only reflects the concerns of protecting certain rights such as the privacy of belief that is in the first amendment. • The right to privacy is never absolute because other rights, such as the right to life, govern it. • Natalie Tansill states, “when a woman makes a decision to kill her child by having an abortion, that decision doesn’t affect only her, but another person’s also. That choice infringes the right of the child for life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.”…

    • 1479 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays