By …show more content…
As a general rule, we as reader tend to sympathize with the narrator; in this case Pip is the narrator. However Dickens’ deliberately makes the narrator expose the situations he is in so objectively that each scenario makes reader feel obligated to sympathize with Pip. Dickens exposes the innocents of Pip, which convinces the reader to place blame on someone else. There is no way that an innocent child knew that he was acting wrongfully, therefore someone else is to blame. There are a few examples of how the narrator portrays the situations he is in …show more content…
Charles Dickens is now a wealthy individual due to the fame he has received through writing. Pip is also a wealthy individual. However, the even with the wealth in their lives, they are still disappointed with who they are. Pip is a very arrogant wealthy man, but has the ability to become humble, Dickens’ does not per say. The closer look at the novel, Pips arrogant phase is Dickens current phase in life. Dickens’ is crying out, if you will, to return to his childhood. Back when he was innocent and humble and not influenced by fame and