Rather than setting the rhetor as myself or the protagonist Gray, I set my rhetor to be both Finn and Leiki. The reason why I made this decision is because in a imaginary world, the existence of the author is not as important as other type of works such as articles and research papers. The only thing people tend to focus in a game script is it story. So making the rhetor a(or both in my case) character within the story will look better compare to me speaking in a game universe.
But why not the protagonist, you may ask. That is because of ethos: Although Gray is a protagonist of the story, he is just an ordinary human who had faced many oppression in his life. He does not have any knowledge about the history of the world or why things had gone toward this direction because of his young age. In comparison with Gray, Finn and Leiki are …show more content…
The Ferradoran universe was created as a game universe in the first place,therefore a game script will fit the most. So does the fantasy genre. Why to build this parallel universe, however, is a important decision for me. Besides the fact that it is about our class theme dystopia, in order to persuade the audience that ‘Things could have been better’, it is best to make a comparison between Desiiperan and Ferradoran where both of them start with a single time line and then drifted apart due to a single decision that humans had made. As I had said before, those decisions will be finally explained by Leiki as a connector. However, I also made some choices throughout the story in order to emphasize this comparison. For example, in my RIP project, Gray will have many visions about the Ferradoran version of himself where he became the hero and saved his own kind. This is made not only that people who had played the previous game feel more familiar with the project, but also making the ending more tragic because he was once a true