Question 1:
The Grantham study was based on information gleaned from the larger AusDiab study, which included a food frequency questionnaire.
Benefits:
• Large Prospective Cohort study like this can judge causality by collect data concerning the series of outcomes.
• This study can measure the impact of diary intake on various outcomes like prevalence of diabetes and risk factors for the chronic diseases of diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and kidney disease.
• The study allow to calculate the incidence of recognized disease in each cohort like Absolute risk (incidence), Relative risk (risk ratio or rate ratio), Risk difference and Attributable risk %).
• One of the main benefits of using data already gathered and synthesizing it for the needed study is in savings of money and time. By using data that already existed, the study authors were able to analyze the data more quickly, were able to save money on administrative costs, and also saved the …show more content…
This indicates that, were the participants in the second tertile to consume the amount of dairy the third tertile is consuming, the incidences of diabetes development could be avoided, which is a very significant statistic. However, according to the results in the study itself, 50% of diabetes would be eliminated by the increase in dairy between the first tertile and third tertile. Both of these rates show that even moderate increases in consumption could have a significant increase on prevention.
Question 8:
The possible confounders adjusted in this study were age, sex, total energy intake, family history of diabetes, education, physical activity, smoking status, serum cholesterol both fasting serum TAG and HDL-C, systolic blood pressure, waist circumference and hip
The Grantham study was based on information gleaned from the larger AusDiab study, which included a food frequency questionnaire.
Benefits:
• Large Prospective Cohort study like this can judge causality by collect data concerning the series of outcomes.
• This study can measure the impact of diary intake on various outcomes like prevalence of diabetes and risk factors for the chronic diseases of diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and kidney disease.
• The study allow to calculate the incidence of recognized disease in each cohort like Absolute risk (incidence), Relative risk (risk ratio or rate ratio), Risk difference and Attributable risk %).
• One of the main benefits of using data already gathered and synthesizing it for the needed study is in savings of money and time. By using data that already existed, the study authors were able to analyze the data more quickly, were able to save money on administrative costs, and also saved the …show more content…
This indicates that, were the participants in the second tertile to consume the amount of dairy the third tertile is consuming, the incidences of diabetes development could be avoided, which is a very significant statistic. However, according to the results in the study itself, 50% of diabetes would be eliminated by the increase in dairy between the first tertile and third tertile. Both of these rates show that even moderate increases in consumption could have a significant increase on prevention.
Question 8:
The possible confounders adjusted in this study were age, sex, total energy intake, family history of diabetes, education, physical activity, smoking status, serum cholesterol both fasting serum TAG and HDL-C, systolic blood pressure, waist circumference and hip