Grand Jury Research Paper

Improved Essays
There are two types of juries that are used in federal court proceedings and trials. The jury of a court can either be a grand jury or a trial jury. Said juries are used in a variety of ways and under certain conditions. The grand jury decides whether there was enough probable cause to send the suspect to trial. If the grand jury decided that indeed there was a sufficient amount of incriminating evidence that could prove the guilt of the suspect, the arrestee is then indicted and taken to arraignment. At the arraignment, the defendant will be informed of the charges that he or she is being prosecuted for. The accused will also then be required to plead either guilty or not guilty. If the defendant pleads not guilty and does not pursue a plea …show more content…
A grand jury is a group of people that have been called by the court to decide to or not to indict a suspect when presented with testimonies from the prosecutor’s witnesses, evidence against the defendant, and the prosecutor’s statement. The grand jury is only allowed to indict a suspect if they believe probable cause has been presented – this does not prove the innocence or guilt of the suspect; however it does mean that the suspect could be charged and sentenced in a following trial. At a grand jury court hearing, the suspect is not allowed to say his or her side of the alleged criminal act that they participated in. The defense attorney is also not allowed to present his or her argument or evidence that may sway the jurors to believe in the suspect’s innocence. However, the prosecutor may question the suspect on the witness stand. In contrast, the purpose of a trial jury is to determine the innocence or guilt of a person that has already been indicted by a grand jury or a preliminary hearing has found information. A trial jury is a group of people called upon by the courts to hear testimonies from the defense and the prospector, thus allowing the idea of “innocent until proven guilty” back into the courtroom. The jury of a trial can either convict or acquit the defendant, depending on the ruling of the …show more content…
A grand jury can have as many as sixteen to 23 jurors. On the contrary, a jury trial is allowed to have as little as six to twelve jurors. An additional difference between the types of juries is the duration of need in which a juror must be present in certain court sessions. In a grand jury, a juror will serve as long as the court proceedings of a defendant lasts, which may take up to eighteen months. On a trial jury, a juror usually only partakes in a single trial. The typical duration of a jury trial is less than ten days. Furthering the differences between a grand jury and a trial jury is the allowance of the public into the courtroom. A grand jury allows only the members of the court to be present when court is in session, whereas a trial jury allows the public into the courtroom (not as

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Jordan Baker Case Summary

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages

    According to the prosecutor on the case, three grand jurors were African-American, one Hispanic, one Asian and seven white. There were eight women and 4 men. They did not want the Harris County District Attorney's Office to release the breakdown of their vote. Harris County District Attorney Devon Anderson said that, “the grand jury's decision means they found that there was no probable cause to believe a crime was committed. It does not constitute an endorsement of the officer's actions."…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Jury takes an oath that it will listen to all of the evidence during the trial and without bias will examine the evidence and determine if there is sufficient evidence that O.J. Simpson had committed the crimes…

    • 1761 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Jury Indictment Summary

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There, the charges against Mr. Carpenter will be read, and the judge will apprise him of his rights. He will then enter a plea. Mr. Carpenter has confessed to the killings, but that does not necessarily mean he will plead guilty. If Mr. Carpenter enters a plea of not guilty his case will be bound over for trial, and a trial date may be set at this time. If his plea is guilty, the judge will inquire as to if he has knowingly and voluntarily given the plea.…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Terry Edwards Trial

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Then the prosecution team gets to interview the jury and has the power to kick some out, so there will be no biased votes. For instance if the suspect is a police officer and one person on the jury is a former police offcier, they will be excused because they might vote in favor just cause of their job. Another reason a person may be kicked off the jury is if they have former connections with them. SO what does this have to do with this case? From these three pieces of evidence, we can clearly see that people now and in the past have manipulated court scenes, juries, and lawyers just to prosecute lives that are innocent.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bench Trial Dbq

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In addition, a typical person generally has a lot of sympathy for other individuals. If they feel sorrowful for the defendant they are likely to give them the benefit of the doubt. In a bench trial, a professional judge with years of experience has no sympathy for an ordinary citizen no matter the circumstances. The jurors are human and haven’t trained as near as much as a trained judge. If a person chooses the jury trial…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The main concept of a voir dire is to determine whether a jury can be “fair, impartial arbiters of fact”. Potential jurors usually are selected from voter registration records for what is commonly referred to as jury duty. In the U.S., they must be from the same jurisdiction as the defendant. After a pool of potential jurors is selected, attorneys for both sides either suggest questions for the judge to ask, or they ask questions themselves of the jurors. The attorneys for both sides have a limited amount of “peremptory challenges,” with which they can bypass the judge and dismiss possible jurors for any reason.…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Jury Trial Summary

    • 2340 Words
    • 10 Pages

    These cases traditionally would come in droves and would be completed quickly as well. Most were decided via a Summary Jury Trial, which essentially serves as a precursor to a real trial. The Summary Jury Trial is meant to encourage settlement. The testimony is delivered before a…

    • 2340 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Adversary Process Trial

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The trial is held in front of a hearing officer, also known in some agencies as administrative law judges. For this trial, the hearing officer acts both as judge and jury. Moving on, in the event where a party disapproves of the outcome an appeal can be filed. The appeal…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It’s easy to forget how important jurors really are to America. Jurors are charged with the responsibility of deciding whether, based on the facts of the case, a person is guilty or not guilty; and therefore, possibly determining if a person is put into jail for life or put on death row. Now if people in this jury don’t even want to be doing jury duty how do we know that these people will give a proper decision. But, if juries are comprised only of people that express an interest or want to serve on a jury then they would make a proper decision. This is well supported by the following text, “The Truth About Jury Duty”, “Impartial Jurors, Impartial Juries”, and “Why Jury Duty Matters”.…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Double Jeopardy

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Pages

    5. Grand Jury – A jury that usually has twenty-three jurors to judge the legitimacy of a accusation 6. Subject – forced to endure 7. Offence (offense) – breaking the law 8. Jeopardy – being in danger on trial for committing a crime 9.…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Questions On 12 Angry Men

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Jury 2: He is a shy person who takes time to feel comfortable enough to participate in the discussion. This can be seen because he was not contributive or driver of the discussion but later contributed his opinion. He is bit insecure in his taught. Jury 3: He is prejudiced about his taught.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a criminal trial, a jury is a group usually comprised of twelve randomly chosen adults, whose role is to hear evidence, apply the law as directed by the judge, and then collectively decide if the defendant is guilty or not guilty of the crime they have been accused of, based only on the facts given. Juries have played a significant role in Australia’s justice system for quite some time, though in more recent years the role of juries has been reduced. In 2011, the NSW government changed the law so that accused persons could apply for judge alone trials and, with consent from the Director of Public, avoid juries entirely (Whitbourn 2013). Currently there is much debate as to whether or not the jury system should be scrapped entirely for criminal trials in NSW.…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury System Dbq Analysis

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    You can, however, say that some of the jury would not be paying attention which could impact the trial but, a jury is made up of more than a couple of people. It is possible that a small portion of the jury would be listening to come up with a decision. This decision would either be the majority of the votes or the same decision would be chosen by people who were not paying attention to agree with the vast majority (Document D, Cartoon1). To continue, another reason for being in favor of jury systems is it prevents corruptions. In bench trials anyone can bribe the judge in order for them to win the case, but in jury trials you will not know who the people are until you show up in court.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brothel Boy Case Study

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The prosecutors are considered to be the most influential actors within the courthouse, as they decide which case to prosecute, the cases to plea-bargain, and the case to try. The prosecutor may also influence the factors of setting bail and creating the sentence. In the United States Constitution, one’s Sixth Amendment right to counsel is granted as many defendants cannot afford to hire a lawyer, they are provided a public defender also known as the defense attorney. The defense attorneys encourage their clients to think about how the jury will assess them as guilty beyond reasonable doubt, therefore most will plead guilt. The judge plays a major authority role in the criminal justice system whether it is in state courts, or larger courts.…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror 3 Analysis

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages

    but there is time constraint and group think has been taken place in the movie. Juror 3 is a biased against the 19-year old boy and he stands strongly in his vote of guilty. As a juror, he has an expected to assist the judge to give a fair trial.…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics