Graffiti Should Be Considered Art Essay

Can Graffiti Ever be Considered Art? Suppose that Leonardo and Monet, or any of the recognized artisans of Western European culture, were alive in the present day. Then suppose that one of these famous artists decided to make a masterpiece on the side of the house or on your wall in your neighborhood. Would Leonardo or Monet’s masterpiece be considered graffiti art or vandalism (Stowers)? Graffiti is a writing or drawing scribbled, scratched, or sprayed illicitly on a wall or other surface in a public place (Oxford Dictionaries). There are those that would consider graffiti not to be art and to be nothing more than a desecration of the urban landscape; however, graffiti may be considered to be an art form because it is an expression of culture, politics, and a creative use of enjoying the 1st Amendment right to freedom of speech; therefore, many people do graffiti just to express themselves. In the ruins of Pompeii, the word graffiti was first used for markings founded. Also a thousand of years ago, scribbling emotions on the walls had been a tradition in Rome. The romans used these scribbling emotions in and sometimes for local dialect such as, anti-government satire, …show more content…
Walk through an alley or a subtrain, you will see different art of graffiti. Also, you would see people, but mostly teens, expressing themselves by spray painting on the walls and shortly getting arrested for expressing themselves by using graffiti. Graffiti in an artist 's eye is more than art. It’s being able to show the world your thoughts. It’s being able to take a dull, black and white and traditional city, to become more colorful and different. Artists look at people that consider graffiti vandalism as closed minded people. Therefore, they should stop thinking inside the box and considered to think outside of