Analysis:
My first hypothesis states that the main problems will be graffiti on the wall, air pollution, footpath erosion and noise pollution, because a lot of people have been there and they painted on the wall to prove that they have already been there, this is also a kind of commemorate. Because of the mass numbers of visitors, noise pollution will be a problem and as tourists drive to get to the Mutianyu, there will also be air pollution produced by cars. Based on Figure 15,there is graffiti existed which makes the Great Wall ugly, but the manager of the Great Wall made a graffiti board, people are no longer drawing on the wall, they are drawing on the graffiti board, and this will not damage the wall itself. I think it is a positive environmental management. There is not much pollution there, you can see the sky is quite blue, this means the air quality is quite good. The reason why it was a sunny day and the AQI was very low is there came the wind from the North, it blew the pollution away. The AQI count is shown in Figure 13 which is 7 degree. It is …show more content…
This makes our data more accurate. Also we collected different kinds of data. All of them helps us understand the overall condition of the Great Wall. When we finished collecting and calculating the data number, every individual shared his or her data to others in order to make our data more accurate. We went to 3 sites to do the questionnaires, take photos and measuring the data. That helps us to know the landform of the Great Wall clearly. The tools and the techniques we used is very professional. For example we used the decibel meter to count the decibel at every site, and we use the AQI tester to count AQI at every moment. We asked about 127 people for questionnaires, that much amount of people makes the environmental quality survey and the environmental impacts survey more
My first hypothesis states that the main problems will be graffiti on the wall, air pollution, footpath erosion and noise pollution, because a lot of people have been there and they painted on the wall to prove that they have already been there, this is also a kind of commemorate. Because of the mass numbers of visitors, noise pollution will be a problem and as tourists drive to get to the Mutianyu, there will also be air pollution produced by cars. Based on Figure 15,there is graffiti existed which makes the Great Wall ugly, but the manager of the Great Wall made a graffiti board, people are no longer drawing on the wall, they are drawing on the graffiti board, and this will not damage the wall itself. I think it is a positive environmental management. There is not much pollution there, you can see the sky is quite blue, this means the air quality is quite good. The reason why it was a sunny day and the AQI was very low is there came the wind from the North, it blew the pollution away. The AQI count is shown in Figure 13 which is 7 degree. It is …show more content…
This makes our data more accurate. Also we collected different kinds of data. All of them helps us understand the overall condition of the Great Wall. When we finished collecting and calculating the data number, every individual shared his or her data to others in order to make our data more accurate. We went to 3 sites to do the questionnaires, take photos and measuring the data. That helps us to know the landform of the Great Wall clearly. The tools and the techniques we used is very professional. For example we used the decibel meter to count the decibel at every site, and we use the AQI tester to count AQI at every moment. We asked about 127 people for questionnaires, that much amount of people makes the environmental quality survey and the environmental impacts survey more