The Failure Of Our Government System

Superior Essays
In today’s world, our government system is seen as a failure. We have too many problems facing our nation such as immigration reform, healthcare, environmental rights, religious rights, terrorism and so much more. These issues have been problems for a long time. Our government is taking too long to resolve this issue. They take too long because our nation is split into half, figuratively. We live in a nation, where half of the country are considering blue states or red states. In our country, we have two political parties that have become polarizing from each other. We have Congressman that care for their state interests than our country as a whole. In our U.S. Constitution, there are no set of rules where it tells how to deal with political …show more content…
I don’t believe we should set a mandatory retirement age for all federal judges because it would be unfair to set a retirement limit. Plus, it can lead to unfair representation from parties since the judges would likely retire when their party is in office. The states justices vs the supreme justices are different since the Supreme Court is part of the judicial branch where it checks and balances the other two branches. Also, the Supreme Court decides if a law is considered constitutional or not. Sabato cannot compare these two systems at the same standard level. In the U.S. Constitution, it says that is until die or retired. The state court has retirement age because that how the state government wanted it to be. Remember anything that was not included in the constitution was stated decision. Both the state justices and supreme justices may have a lot of similar but they are totally different. The Supreme Court justices were selected based on the level. Also, I disagree that we should have twelve Supreme Court Justice because it can lead to not having a majority vote, it can result of the judges being split. This can leave to unresolved cases, therefore, procrastinating other cases. I agree would expand the Supreme Court but to eleven justices since there is a lot of work to do. It should always be an odd number because an even number can lead to unresolved …show more content…
This proposal enhances electoral competition and lessens the influence of gerrymandering. Our government is too divided, nothing can be done to solve the issues facing our nation. Most of the Congressmen forget that they 're representing all the people of their State, not just the people who voted for them. The Constitution itself would call for universal nonpartisan redistricting, therefore, preventing the control by any party. I agree that we should expand the size of the House than the Senate because these representatives are closer to the people of their state since it is divided into districts. If we expand the House, we can have more diverse representation. I know we would pay higher taxes but I am willing to pay higher taxes for more representation in the House. The House is based on population but I will not expand to 1,000 members maybe expand at least 750 members. Because of this, the House members can be closer to their

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    On Saturday, December 9th, the US Supreme Court voted 5-4 to abandon the hand recounts in the counties and set a new hearing for December 11th. This hearing lasted for two solid days, and on December 12th, the US Supreme Court ruled 7-2 in Bush v Gore and reversed the verdict made by the Florida Supreme Court. The court ruled that: not all ballots were being treated equally and thus a violation of the Constitution 's 14th amendment equal protection clause, the Florida Supreme Court would be required to set up new voting practices and standards to follow in the recount. However, the justices were split 5-4 over how to solve the problem at hand. Five of the justices expressed that the initial date already set for the recounted votes should infact…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Political Ineffectiveness

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Two such episodes can be observed that look at extreme cases of gridlock during the height of political ineffectiveness in Obama’s rule. Each case study takes the attention off of partisanship, and refocuses the critique onto the structure of American government. On March 23, 2010, President Barack Obama signed the Affordable Care Act into law. Surrounding its passing was much political opposition and heated disapproval.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If the United States government was designed to be the best for the people, why does it cause so many problems in the lives of the citizens today? In the papers today it is uncommon to not find some article talking about some issue that is going on in politics. The government has lost many of the original principles that the Founding Fathers had in place to make sure the government’s main goal was to keep the country good and safe for the people. Problems facing the government today are what has caused this loss in principles, and ushered in a an era of gridlocks, corruption, and corporate influence on the government. In Congress, issues have become tougher to solve because of gridlocks.…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Government is a very complex system. Nobody truly understands government so everyone makes up their own opinions on how it is meant to be run. This has been the root of America’s problem. America has spent too much time dividing and fighting amongst themselves. And the politicians have been doing this their whole lives.…

    • 1714 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I believe a litmus test should be used. Federal judges are in for 10 years unless reappointed for. During the time the Federal judges are in office things will change over the many years they are in. We shouldn’t hold onto beliefs or laws that are outdated. The decisions of these judges impact not only the parties involved in a particular case, but also the entire judicial system and even society at large.…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1788 the Federalist Papers were mostly written by Madison. The ideas shared in the Federalist Papers were relevant when Madison was alive, however, the problem is: are they still relevant and effective today. First governmental structure in USA is unique, no other government has the same system as this country. It is the only country that changed everything dealing with politics back in that decade, which shows how much the founding fathers were aware of the political issues. News in those days were spread quicker as they occurred but unfortunately most of it are not true or even reliable.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the past, Americans have prided themselves in living in one of the most unified countries in the world but lately it seems as if Americans are bitter and afraid. Our economy has been stagnant leaving many workers feeling desperate and insecure. Instead of coming together Americans have moved farther apart due to the inequality between the rich and the poor, racial tensions and political polarization. Political leaders have consistently broken promises they make to the people leading to even more distrust by the American people and is most likely the reason a man like Donald Trump was able to become president. Through all of these problems it seems as if politics has failed us and is not fixing anything.…

    • 228 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The formation for the government of the United States has been a rough process packed with regulations, restrictions and expansions to serve for the good of its people. The journey started with the Articles of Confederation, which attempted to unify the largely sovereign states following the American Revolution. After the Articles failed to govern or provide for U.S. citizens, the Constitution was triumphally ratified to allow a balanced central government successfully lead the nation. The rights of citizens were increasingly protected through the Bill of Rights, new laws and future Amendments. Today, many citizens are split between several political beliefs, essentially pondering or protesting over how much power our government should possess.…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    These studies that mental illness is also a reason to mass shootings, and that psychiatric diagnoses can predict gun crimes before they are even committed. Gun laws must be heavily reorganized, and in regards to the Second Amendment there must be changes while keeping the modern world in context. The regulation of firearms is a tough subject to push, as there is a community that exists in America that firmly believes in the right to bear arms, which delays any political progress happening on the issue. Mental illness in America has a bad wrap, it is treated as a personal flaw rather than a disease, and an average human may not seek treatment because there is a stigma behind mental illness, and there is a lot of risk to accepting the fact that…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I would want more people in the House of Representatives and have more say on political things going on in our country because we have more people. More people means more voices and more opinions. Now, people from the smaller states may not agree with it but, you have to put yourself in the shoes of both the people in the larger state and the smaller state to see why is a good idea. Would you want the smaller state with a fraction of the people have the same amount of votes as the larger states?…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    That a case arising under the constitution should be decided without examining the instrument under which it arises?” ( John Dickhaus; 2013) This decision means the rights were given to the Supreme Court to decide this case even though it was stated in the constitution. The courts give many reasons for us to be ashamed of them, but does this warrant the need to limit the tenure of federal judges and turn the court into a partisan war zone? Justices are not concerned with popularity, they make hard, life altering decisions every day without the fear of making many people mad. Justice should be able to sit the bench without fear of worrying about their positions in the court and focus their time and energy on the hard judicial case decisions that come their…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    For over two hundred thirty years, the United States of America has thrived on life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness as set forth in the Declaration of Independence. It is these same values which American voters attempt to illuminate, keep, and prolong. Congress, however, can create laws which block those same values our founders laid down. America’s job is to prevent that from happening by electing people to represent them in government. The people vote for those whom they think will best represent them, the people vote for who has the same ideals as them, and the people vote depending on which specific party they register.…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The design of two houses making up Congress allows the wants of the people to never be settled, because neither side can reach an agreement. The founding fathers’ intentions for Congress to be a government in which the people are represented and heard clearly failed due to the never-ending cycle of The Washington Establishment, the most prominent evidence of a broken government. No government is perfect; however, America should set an example to other countries as one with a government that truly represents its constituents, not as one with a broken…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A law involving gerrymandering was passed in 1967 that banned multimember districts for fear of racism or an unfair advantage to one party (Yglesias). The argument for gerrymandering is that it balances the seats in Congress, half Republican and half Democrat, providing the minority more of a majority in congress. It also provides politicians the ability to safely guarantee the majority in the House does not change because of…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Republican Party is moving in a more conservative direction and the Democratic Party staying consistently liberal on major issues of public policy (Jones 2001). Particularly in congress empirical research shows the parties in our government are becoming more homogenous in their political positions, while the differences among the party’s on policy issues continues to magnify (Jones 2001). In congress alone, polarization is visible by that fact that “since 1990 more than half of the congressional votes have featured a majority of one party opposing a majority of another” (Jones 2001). This intense polarization has had major effects on the relationship between congress and the president in particular. Looking at the theory of divided government it explains that legislation is less likely to get passed when the…

    • 1004 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays