Government Surveillance Pros And Cons

Improved Essays
Shivendra Raghav
ENGL – 1302 - 073
Dr. Johnny Stein
16 February 2015
Abstract Confidentiality
Over the last couple of decades, technology has boosted at an enormous rate. The colossal earth does not seem to be so big anymore. Internet has now bound us together in a world where all the data is congregated and analyzed. In today’s world we find ourselves being observed all the time. The government of the United States, with the help of major telecommunication companies, has been accessing private information of the clients including their private texts messages, emails and calls. This is a violation of the citizen of the United States according to the fourth amendment. The fourth amendment protects the privacy of the citizens against the government
…show more content…
Many high profile leaders including President Barack Obama, have defended the NSA surveillance program. They see this program as a way to fight terrorism and believe that the program has the right balance and does not violates the rights of the citizens of the country. The president defends the surveillance program because it does not look into personal details but only relevant details, and stated that the people cannot have both, total security and total privacy. There are 30 percent of the democrats and 23 percent of the republicans supporting him too. Some may argue that the surveillance violates people’s privacy while the other people may argue that it helps to protect the citizens of the …show more content…
The surveillance was not as recent as people may think it is, we only came to know about it recently. According to a credible resource I learned that the NSA expressed its desire to use surveillance for the first time in the year 2000. It was not given the authority until after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the White House started to show its interest in the surveillance program. Then in the same year, the president of the United States authorized the program to NSA director General Michael Hayden. Since then NSA was given various powers like to record the numbers which call places like Afghanistan and also put these people in the area of their interest. With the authorization now NSA was able to keep a track of these phone number with the help of metadata provided to them by the telecom companies. This data can help them locate and keep a track of that caller at all times. Now, that these events have happened and also considering the fact that NSA general counsel stated in 2001 that the program is legal, it has propagated the idea that the surveillance system was needed. Over the last 12 years various laws have been enacted in the favor of the government surveillance program. It is not going to be an easy issue to resolve. There are majority of people against the program but those numbers have also changed in the last couple of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    These electronic surveillance activities clearly violate the right to privacy that most Americans expect when they use simple, modern, and common…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The United States of America the National Security Agency has been working for ages to assure that the country is safe, but recently it has become a rising concern that they have overstepped their boundaries of American citizen’s privacy by operating surveillance technology all around the country and storing data form every phone call of citizens. With the American Citizens’ privacy at stake, each branch of government took its stand against the matter. The Judicial Branch has to come up with a legal compromise; the Legislative Branch and Congress are working to make surveillance laws that would better please its citizens, and the Executive Branch and the president have agreed to come up with an alternative to Section 215 of The Patriot Act. The Supreme Court has to establish a legal compromise to the surveillance of the American citizens considering it was said that what the National Security Agency/Central Security was doing went against Section 215 of the Patriot Act.…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    NSA warrantless surveillance controversy Introduction The NSA warrantless surveillance controversy concerns with the surveillance of people within the United States. It all started while the collection of allegedly foreign intelligence by the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) was going on as part of the war on terror. The National Security Agency is one of America's largest intelligence organizations. It is similar to the FBI and CIA.…

    • 1695 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This directly goes against the fourth amendment in the bill of rights of the United States. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) was passed in nineteen seventy eight. The United States government used to use FISA and acts like FISA to spy on other nations governments and citizens, the difference with the Patriot Act is, they are spying on their own citizens. “The provisions of Section two hundred and thirteen of the Patriot Act allow federal searches to be conducted and delayed notice to be given to the subject. The subject of the search may never be given notice that a search was conducted if criminal proceedings are not initiated after the search” (the Patriot Act).…

    • 1465 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Patriot Act Pros And Cons

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Wiretapping is an infringement of a person’s rights. The United States has the power to do this under the U.S. Patriot Act, but they actually are only allowed to monitor a conversation if they have a probable cause and a warrant. A great quote regarding NSA Wiretapping in relation to the Patriot Act comes from Dean Heller, a senator from Nevada. He said in a press release that “there is a fine line between protecting our nation and protecting our Fourth Amendment rights.”…

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    There are many challenges that law enforcement agencies faces when it comes to enforcing public safety at the same time protect the rights of individuals. Balancing civil liberties and fighting terrorism is a delicate task that is affecting the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). The focus is the of involvement relationship between public safety and individual rights. The first topic is the statutory authority and responsibilities of government officials, security personnel, and private citizens. The next topic involves the practices or laws relating to search, seizures, and surveillance by police, corrections, private citizens, and security personnel.…

    • 1705 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The NSA’s primary way of fighting terrorism, as previously noted, was through the collection and surveillance of every citizens’ communications data – known as “The Program” according to the documentary. However, not only is “The Program” unconstitutional and illegal, it has also proven to be less than helpful in contributing to the counter-terrorism efforts. While several top government officials – including President Obama, former President George W. Bush, former Vice President Cheney, former NSA Chief Michael Hayden, and others – claim that many threats have been averted thanks to “The Program,” a report found, according to Anna Mulrine, that “traditional investigative methods, such as the use of informants, tips from local communities, and targeted intelligence operations, provided…for investigations in the majority of cases, while the contribution of NSA’s bulk surveillance programs to these cases was minimal…playing an identifiable role in initiating, at most, 1.8 percent of these cases” (Mulrine, Anna). She goes on, with a quote from a source saying “’it can’t justify the gathering of these millions of records when it can be done another way where the government doesn’t have to obtain all of that information’” (Mulrine, Anna).…

    • 2021 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Resolved: The United States federal government should substantially curtail its domestic surveillance. Plan: The government will curtail its surveillance by only viewing collected data by means of a warrant. Intro-After the NSA reported their first transparency avowal, the publisher Omicron Technology Limited stated, “The report said 19,212 "national security letters"—administrative subpoenas that allow the FBI to collect information without a warrant—were issued last year, containing 38,832 requests for information.” These unwarranted leaks are why this problem needs to be solved. That is why we stand resolved that “The United States federal government should substantially curtain its domestic surveillance.…

    • 1880 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The government can potentially cause an intrusion of privacy and abuse their power on the people who trust them to handle their information legally and…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Fourth Amendment is comprehensive and highly valued by American citizens and reflects the framers belief that the government should not be allowed to interfere in some aspects of a citizen’s life. The Fourth Amendment clearly protects a person’s home and personal property, but their electronic communications are less defined and protected under current law. When the Constitution was written, paper records were all that existed and these were protected; electronic records should qualify equally and be considered the same as “papers and effects.”…

    • 130 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They began to begin wiretapping on citizens which are when the practice of connecting a listening device to a telephone line to secretly monitor a conversation. Which is definitely an act under the Patriot Act but unfortunately is being done. It has enabled the government to reach past borders to protect its citizens like never imagined before (Mullikin, Rahman, 2010). There is an Ethical Dilemma of the USA Government Wiretapping, one side of the argument we have a loss privacy of privacy which is necessary if we are to protect our country from terrorist attacks, although on the other side, our civil liberty groups and others will argue that giving up…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (BBC News. Snowden, Jan. 17, 2014). These surveillance issues caused for a public backlash against government surveillance and the NSA. The majority of Americans disapprove of the NSA’s collection of telephone records and more and more people are beginning to be concerned about the country’s lack of civil liberty protection because they don’t believe their liberties should be sacrificed in the name of counter-terrorism. (Civil Liberty in America, Gao, G May 29, 2015).…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is a finite line between national security and the privacy of innocent Americans in their day to day lives. The right to have privacy was provided to people when it was installed in the 4th amendment to the constitution. Although the U.S. Government has been stretching out this basic right and invading the privacy right that every American has. The government should not be allowed to freely use surveillance programs to watch over innocent people 's every move. Stated in the 4th amendment there is the right for people “to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated.…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Importance Of The NSA

    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The center on law and security (2007) states, “Critics of the NSA program do not necessarily object to the type of surveillance, but rather to the way in which it has been authorized, and to the absence of any oversight”…

    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Another example why many people do not accept surveillance is because it has also affect the people by causing discrimination against one another. Greenwald also states “Some of the surveillance was ostensibly devoted to terrorism suspects. But great quantities of the program manifestation have nothing to do with national security.” (94) In this quote Greenwald says that many of the programs have nothing to do with national security because they don’t just see the information or everything there surveillance is capturing the government is saving everything not for a day nor a week but for years and this is information that they don’t need to have.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays