Government Spying Research Paper

Decent Essays
I have a strong argument that the government should not be able to invade my privacy and look at my information on my phone or other people’s phones. Spying on people’s phones is an invasion of their privacy. Even though it maybe useful for spying for terrorist reasons itś still wrong to spy on someone. Spying on someone is invading their personal space or their privacy. Gathering data from citizens’ cell phones, even if only briefly, may violate the Constitution. Americans would consider spying to be information gathering on law abiding citizens. Even taking a picture without someone’s consent is illegal.
Equally striking, the system was developed with assistance from the Central Intelligence Agency, which is an organization specifically

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    These electronic surveillance activities clearly violate the right to privacy that most Americans expect when they use simple, modern, and common…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This directly goes against the fourth amendment in the bill of rights of the United States. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) was passed in nineteen seventy eight. The United States government used to use FISA and acts like FISA to spy on other nations governments and citizens, the difference with the Patriot Act is, they are spying on their own citizens. “The provisions of Section two hundred and thirteen of the Patriot Act allow federal searches to be conducted and delayed notice to be given to the subject. The subject of the search may never be given notice that a search was conducted if criminal proceedings are not initiated after the search” (the Patriot Act).…

    • 1465 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Patriot Act Dbq Essay

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Taking away the extra security of Americans because one is frightened, annoyed or scared of the government having access to their online conversations is unethical, concerning and unfair to…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    9/11 Cons

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Since the government is invading our privacy it’s like having them watching our every move and constantly looking through our photo’s, Facebook messages, and text messages. For example when the FBI wanted Apple to unlock a terrorist phone so that they could look at the text messages. Apple informed the FBI that if they unlock that phone then they would be forced to unlock all of the phones. If they did this then hackers or the government could get a hold of something they don't need to know about. The government need to stop invading our privacy because if something gets leaked it could cost the government a lot of money or ruin someone’s life.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    9/11 Ethical Dilemmas

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This means that even our most private and personal phone calls, texts, and emails are subject to review by government officials. There should be more limits placed on how much the NSA can actually access and if they come across a person of interest or anything they deem suspicious, they should have to obtain a warrant so the person is aware they are going through their personal things. Otherwise, the government is taking away the right that has…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    An article titled, “Electronic Surveillance,” written by Cornell University states, “Obtaining a warrant for electronic surveillance requires showing probable cause, describing in particularity the conversation to be intercepted, providing a specific time period for the interception of the communications device, and noticing the property owner unless law enforcement can show exigent circumstances. As with ordinary searches and seizures, exigent circumstances may serve as grounds for law enforcement to dispense with first obtaining a warrant. If law enforcement encounters a situation threatening a person's life, a conspiracy threatening the national security, or a conspiracy suggesting organized crime, then law enforcement may proceed without first acquiring a warrant.” The U.S. has clearly been using surveillance technology unconstitutionally.…

    • 1880 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since the horrific events of September 11 2001, the Congress has passed the Patriot Act and approved by the Senate and the House of Representatives. But on October 26, when the President Bush signed the Act, no House of Representatives or the Senate reports this. The extensive terrorist attack may be decreased, but the Patriot Act still have false charge and still be accused of dangerous rise of the government surveillance. It’s true that the Patriot Act has acted to violate privacy expectations and suspect regular Americans citizens. “It violates the privacy of millions of innocent people” (source 1).…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is meant to protect innocent people from terrorism, nuclear weapons, and crime. Although it does do this, it is not always agreed with. U.S. people do not always like the idea of an agency analyzing, and collecting communication data from their people. The extent of the surveillance is quite shocking, but it is used to protect innocent lives of the United States people from things that can be stopped. The National Security Agency does have reasonable doubt when they get involved with a person’s communication.…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    *The NSA shouldn’t be spying on citizens because it is a violation of the U.S citizens rights, causes a psychological affect, and they have an inefficient system that wrongfully accuses people *. The NSA and telecommunication companies are betraying people’s trust by violating their privacy. One major telecommunication company…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Edward snowden is a computer professional that is famously known for leaking information on the U.S. National Security Agency in 2013. Snowden said in an interview that “ The NSA has built an infrastructure that allows it to intercept almost everything that is uses telecommunications.”(www.cfr.org). This infrastructure collects data all around the United States. This is private information that is being collected without our consent or a warrant being present. The Obama Administration defended the surveillance program saying “ it 's legal, limited and effective with preventing terrorist acts” (www.cfr.org).…

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is a finite line between national security and the privacy of innocent Americans in their day to day lives. The right to have privacy was provided to people when it was installed in the 4th amendment to the constitution. Although the U.S. Government has been stretching out this basic right and invading the privacy right that every American has. The government should not be allowed to freely use surveillance programs to watch over innocent people 's every move. Stated in the 4th amendment there is the right for people “to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated.…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Importance Of The NSA

    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The center on law and security (2007) states, “Critics of the NSA program do not necessarily object to the type of surveillance, but rather to the way in which it has been authorized, and to the absence of any oversight”…

    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many Americans expressed their disapproval as two classified operations were exposed. Examples of the government spying on their own people, through phones internet services etc. “Yet, most showed little concern about their own internet activities or phone calls being monitored”(Conchar 14). I believe this is to battle against terrorism and keep America safe.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most critics of surveillance argue about how it is an abuse of power, a violation of people 's privacy, and most importantly, unconstitutional, while proponents of surveillance claim the benefit of surveillance is a reduction in the probability of high-cost events such as terrorism. Government surveillance programs, when conducted in controlled situations and closely audited by independent organizations, do not directly harm innocent civilians, especially when they benefit the safety of the general public. Surveillance, by definition, is the act of carefully watching someone or something especially in order to prevent or detect a crime. If that definition was used when discussing the issue of government surveillance, most public safety activities,…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Forward: When Edward Snowden revealed that the NSA was spying on us in 2012, I expected people to be outraged. I expected a massive public backlash that would lead to reform. By and large, the public’s reaction has been underwhelming. For one reason or another, government surveillance is a topic that many people don’t know about or don’t talk about. I’ve talked to people about surveillance before, and many of them were unaware of key details about it.…

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays