Government Monitoring Internet Activity Essay

Improved Essays
"

To what extent in the U.S. does the government-federal, state, and local-have the duty to monitor the internet content?

I find myself pondering the argument of if it is okay for the government to watch internet activity. In some circumstances I am in favor of the U.S. government-federal, state, and local watching over what we do on the internet. Sometimes it can benefit us when solving crimes such as, the ""Dark web"" or pre-planned murder. For instance, Casey Anthony who researched on google how to make chloroform and how it is properly used. If internet monitoring was in effect it could have saved a childs life. It can also be good for suspicious internet activity. For example, one of my peers used her debit card to order her college text book from Washington state. Her debit card got blocked by the bank and her amazon account was suspended for suspicious activity due to the fact she ordered from
…show more content…
Most online gun trade is centered from Washington state. They could find many hidden things on the internet, as in hidden emails or key words that mean something totally different than what the word itself portrays.

I also am a firm believer of privacy and personal space. I think that some websites should be monitored and some should not be, for example adult websites should definitely be monitored because teenage females often are found in the videos when they have no business being in them. Websites as Facebook should really not have to watched over. I personally think a person should be allowed to have their own conversation without having to worry if they are being watched over or not. I have found myself placed in the middle of this overly controversial matter, because I do think it could help to protect those who surround me and myself, but I strongly believe people should have the right to there own privacy. I feel as though if

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    9/11 Security Issues

    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages

    We live in a society now that is more inter-connected than any other in history. There are cameras in every phone and on every street corner, microphones in all 'smart' devices and a seemingly infectious apathy towards these windows in to our private lives. Post 9/11 saw the world, primarily the United States, crack down on its security by instituting legislation like the Patriot Act, which was a law basically stripping away the basic rights granted to an American citizen if the government deemed you a threat. Now that the innate fear of terrorism has fallen since then, a massive discussion has arisen regarding what information the government can ethically obtain through digital means and what is really ‘too far’ and should not be breached…

    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article “The Internet is a surveillance state”, which appeared on CNN.com on March 16, 2013, Bruce Schneier claims the government can see our every move on the internet. He goes on to state, “Whether we admit it to ourselves or not, whether we like it or not, we’re being tracked at all times.” (55). He uses specific and persuasive examples from his work experience to share his thoughts and beliefs on a subject that not everyone is aware of, but the ones who do are usually chilled by it. This paper will analyze Schneier’s article from his view as an American security technologist, cryptologist, and author of “Liars and authors:…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With this collected data, the United States government can monitor internet users. These technological advancements, along with the rising fear of terrorism and international crime, has led to the surveillance of many innocent American citizens. The United States government can easily collect information about anyone, with little or no judicial supervision. For example, in 2008, the FBI sought out a robbery suspect, and, without a warrant, collected information on the suspect along with 180 other…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Privacy is not an option, and it shouldn't be the price we accept for just getting on the Internet,” stated Gary Kovacs the president of several software companies (Kovacs). However, since the implementation of the Patriot Act in 2001, the loss of American privacy is one of the many results of the new set of revised laws that have been rewritten to give the government more freedom in observing our electronic fingerprint (“Surveillance Under the Patriot Act”). In their hurry to act on the tragedy of 9/11, Congress passed the Act a mere 45 days of the event, with little to no debate. The result of it’s ratification, was a drastic change in the surveillance laws and restrictions of the federal government (“End Mass Surveillance Under the Patriot…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the Untied States of America, the First Amendment allows individuals the right to freedom of speech, press, and religion. According to The Law of Journalism and Mass Communication, “The First Amendment to the U.S Constitution includes only 45 words. It says, congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances” (Trager. p52). However, there seems to be room for debate…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Or should the NSA have more rights looking into people’s whereabouts to provide safety of the United States. The reason why this act is causing so much conflict is because in some opinions it’s violating the first and fourth amendment of the constitution, but in others opinions it’s providing us safety and isn’t violating the constitution. The reason why they may never be able to have a compromise is because they may never be able to choose between what matters most, freedom or safety, and that is why this issue is extremely…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Every person in the world should have their own rights to decide what they want to do. It is because no one should not be controlled over what people’s thoughts and opinions. Moreover, most people do not like when some strangers keep looking at what people are doing their business. In 1984, that is called Big Brother was watching people through the telescreen which could see and hear everything that people are doing and talking. Telescreens were everywhere such as streets, houses, and even in the restrooms.…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    There have been government searches and seizures of private electronic communications that have been in the news and the topic of privacy rights has become subject to debate. During the Busch…

    • 130 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In order to ensure the safety of the citizens of the United States of America, the US government should be allowed to surveill its citizens under the correct circumstances. After the bombing of the World Trade Center in September of 2001, security measures have been put in place in order to prevent similar events from happening. A person’s digital property should be subject to the same rules and regulations as their physical property. Of course this doesn’t mean watching every waking move, like in George Orwell’s 1984, “Always eyes watching you and the voice enveloping you. Asleep or awake, indoors or out of doors, in the bath or bed- no escape.…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Unfortunately, ensuring cyber-security is something that is yet to be archived by the United States. Not only is the safety of American citizens jeopardized by reckless use of a social media, but furthermore classified information that belongs to private agencies or government officials is also being jeopardized by hackers. In “Improving Cybersecurity” Hillary Clinton states, “Countries that restrict free access to information or violate basic rights of Internet users risk walling themselves off from the progress of the next century” (qtd. Flamini 171). This being the case, restricting the public’s use of the Internet wouldn’t be an effective way of ensuring safety, it would instead work as a setback in human rights.…

    • 139 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I think the government should have surveillance, because for this reason, to prevent harm to the people of our nation. The government or any public funded entity should surveillance to maintain order. Many will argue that we should have our privacy and leave it at that. If the government did not have regulations on the people how would they protect us? Ask yourself this, what is more important, your privacy or national security?…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Everyone is being watched. Everything that is done on the internet is tracked. When most people hear this, they prefer to block all forms of tracking when they browse the internet. This would be okay if it was not for the fact that most people cannot live without several services that require a certain degree of tracking. It is some of these features that people have come to depend on in their everyday life, thus blurring the line that separates acceptable tracking from stalking.…

    • 2046 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Everyone knows that the government has the most power, but should they be allowed to use surveillance to keep things in order, or are they abusing the power that they are given? The government abuses their power because they think nothing is going to happen to them, For example, in December 2005 the government tapped into other people's phones and listened to their conversations without a warrant. Every time the government needs to use the power they have, they need to follow protocol before taking action. The government's control on surveillance is more harmful than people know.…

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They do agree that this can help prevent terrorism. Yes this may be a great way to protect everyone but the government should have a limit; there is no reason why they should be saving all the data they encounter. The government should not be checking our phone calls or our credit cards bill this is a violation of the fourth amendment. The civil right was made to protect every individual from higher position abuse for example government, police, or even the president. Some surveillance may protect the state but the government should not be able to store this information with out the people having consent about it.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are quite a few government and intelligence agencies including the National Security Agency (NSA), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and also state and local law enforcement agencies. With modern day technology becoming so advanced, agencies must find new ways to stay ahead and on top of the security for the nation. The National Security Agency’s mass surveillance has expanded in the years since September 11, 2001. Many people happen to be against government monitoring only because they are unaware of how data is retrieved, analyzed, and stored by the government networks. The process is more than just collecting information from phone calls, emails, and other online communications.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays