Analysis Of The Article 'Government Control Of Your Diet'

Improved Essays
It is evident that over the years the government has increased the amount of restrictions placed on food significantly in America. In the article, ' 'Government Control of Your Diet ' ' The ideas discussed exemplify why government food regulations infringe on our own personal decisions regarding what we wish to put into our bodies. Not only does this infringe on our private decisions, it also intervenes by providing basic and inadequate information the general public already knows. Last but not least is the health care programs costs being justified by unhealthy habits. All these reasons contribute to the complex bans on foods that the government does not want you to eat. The government takes away our basic rights and freedoms guaranteed to us as citizens of the United States. …show more content…
This is a personal choice and liberty in our lives that we are free to make on our own. The author Daren Bakst represents this statement well by stating in the article that, ' 'In a free society, people are entitled to live as they deem fit, especially in their personal lives, absent clear and direct harm to others. ' ' Our personal rights are being violated, and Americans cannot live the way they choose to do so without a government interference. ' ' This quote from Bankst is significant because we must be reminded we do live in a free society and have to be aware of our
Word Count: 846 rights as citizens. We are ' 'entitled ' ' to do as we please and if that means making questionable food choices or eating healthy for a personal benefit then it must be known that these entire decisions fall on our own

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Higher-income earning individuals have access to better education, research and development, such as Howard Moskowitz (Moss 263), and obtain the knowledge about the foods that are processed. Through this they avoid the obesity risk whereas the low income individual is simply taking what they can get, whether they have the full knowledge of it or not. The inferences that can be conjured about culture, politics, and economics in the United States through Monica Dranes’s statement about “Lunchables” in The Extraordinary Science of Addictive Junk Food, by Michael Moss, is that the United States consists of characters that act on impulse to feed to their gratification all often under the manipulation of grand companies. We have warnings about many of the items that we want to consume, but at the end of the day we want to get our hands not necessarily on something that makes us healthy, but what makes us…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In “Our National Eating Disorder”, Michael Pollan compares the way Americans eat to that of the French’s. He opens up this article discussing the American fad of dieting and calorie counting. Discussing the “omnivore’s dilemma”, Pollan claims it is hard for Americans to decide what to eat due to the obtainibility of seasonal foods, also relating to processed products. The increase of these processed foods has helped the availability of altering their nutritional values tremendously. With this comes food marketing that can help shape the minds of Americans’ way of thinking, making them feel the need to be more conscious of what they eat.…

    • 181 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Enter the twenty-first century: Greek yogurt, quinoa, juice cleanses, and Fitbits. Eating healthier and making the right choices at mealtime have gained popularity. And food companies have evolved to meet the demands of the customers who want all-natural, organic, GMO-free products. Yet despite this push to eat healthier, it appalls me that our efforts are being reversed by our very own government. O’Connor writes that the federal government subsidizes foods, like corn and soybeans.…

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his essay, “What You Eat is Your Business” Radley Balko asserts that it is not the government’s responsibility what you put into your body. He calls for no regulation on the fast food industry, declaring it a personal responsibility issue. Balko claims that the best method of reducing the obesity problem is removing it from the public sector, and making it a personal problem. However, I believe that he is oversimplifying an issue which he does not fully understand. I also believe that he is mistaking regulation of industry and informing consumers of what they are eating for socialized medicine.…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    More than 2 in 3 adults and about one-third of children are considered to be overweight or obese. In his article “What You Eat Is Your Business,” Radley Balko claims the idea that we should take responsibility of what we eat instead of blaming the government for it. Balko argues that the way the government is spending a lot of money for anti obesity measure isn’t the right approach to prevent obesity. In contrast, in David Zinczenko’s article “Don’t Blame The Eater,” he insists how the fast food industries are to be blamed for the problem of obesity in America. He explains how the rate of diabetes in children has dramatically increased because of the negative effects of the fast food restaurants.…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Rhetorical Analysis of “Canadian Lifestyle Choices: A Public Health Failure” In the essay “Canadian Lifestyle Choices: A Public Health Failure”, Daniel Rosenfield et al. discusses the government’s action regarding Canadian health policies. The authors make a strong argument that due to the Canadian governments lacking health policies, the overall health of Canadians is deteriorating. It is further discussed that the decline in health is due to poor regulation of foods, including portion sizes at restaurants, lack of properly labelled products, and added ingredients to foods.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Pollan’s essay “The American Paradox”, he defines the American Paradox and discusses how to fix the American diet. He explains how too many unhealthy Americans are preoccupied and obsessed with nutrition facts and the idea of eating healthy. He also mentions that the food industry, nutrition science, and journalism are the parties that have been the cause of this confusion about eating healthy. He thinks that worrying about nutrition facts and living a so called “healthy” lifestyle is the wrong way Americans think about eating today. I agree with Pollan’s argument because focusing on nutrition facts and dietary foods can mislead the consumer and create some health problems.…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article “Oh Brother,” which was first published in the Boston Globe in 2006, Jeff Jacoby raises a question about U.S. people’s liberty by illustrating an issue of banning trans fats from restaurants in New York City. He argues that, trans fats food is bad in some perspectives, such as it could raise the risk of heart disease and it is bad for people’s long-term health. However, trans-fats food also brings people immediate joy when dinning, and that makes trans fats food becomes a personal option that people should make by themselves, rather than the government decides for them. Jacoby refer the government as the “Big Brother,” and he claims that the “Big Brother” is limiting people’s freedom from some perspectives, but it is also sometimes…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wendell Berry argues that we should ‘’eat responsibly’’, meaning that the individual is responsible. Along with David Barboza notes that big food companies say ‘’despite some promises to offer healthier foods and in some cases to limit marketing in schools, deny that they are to blame for the epidemic of excess weight. They insist that sedentary behavior, a lack of exercise, and poor supervision and eating habits are responsible’’ (Barboza). On the other hand, Michael Pollan blames government policies for the fact that ‘’Our entire food supply has undergone a process of ‘’cornification’’ in recent years, without our even noticing it’’. In my view, I agree with Michael Pollan and Wendell Berry because it’s the government’s fault that our food supply is all corn and also that it’s our fault because we can choose what we eat and that’s mighty factor in health and…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Not Necessary Why should the government be able to regulate diets in America? They shouldn't. It will just result in more problems, and more money. The government should have their focus somewhere else in considering that America is a free country, there's more important problems going on, and because they take part in the cause for obesity. America is a free country, and regulating what people eat doesn't sound like freedom to me whatsoever.…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People eat what is in front of them and when entering a grocery store you always see all these advertisements about sweets and sugar and if the government changed it and maybe advertised fruits and vegetables, people would think about fruits and vegetable more and more (Schmidt). Also, I believe that the government should intervene whenever it comes to the public health of their citizens. While I understand the people’s point that government intervention would cause violation of people eating what they want and being free to choose what they want (Bakst). While that is understandable, it is still very wrong. To reduce the obesity rates in the us, the government in some areas enforced the soda tax which would mean that stores would have to pay more and causing customers to pay more which while not perfect, is a start and could lead into good directions (Brownell).…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Summary #2 In the article “What You Eat Is Your Business”, written by Radley Balko emphasizes how important is it to have personal responsibility when it comes to deciding what you are going to fuel your body with. He insists that the government should never be the ones making the choices for consumers and that people need to step up and do whats right for themselves. Explaining in detail that promoting anti obesity initiatives, removing junk food from sources, and making food labels mandatory is getting the government too involved with you and your health.…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    National Food Policy

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Don’t you feel that you have the right to choose what you eat ? This argumentative essay will look at the National Food policy and consequently the way it would change how Americans eat. In this essay, we will be arguing against the national food policy feeling that Americans have the right to eat the way they choose to, though regulations may help, they would be against our rights in America. Reasons why are that this is America the land of the free and everyone should have the right to eat what they want whether it is good or bad for them, that is their choice. If there were regulations on food it could possibly drive the price up.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dietary Guidelines Essay

    • 1520 Words
    • 7 Pages

    This article was to examine how the US government uses dietary guidelines for Americans and how the guidelines was suppose to help us eat and stay healthy. Diet and chronic disease are sometimes connected. For example it is proven that nutrient deficiency disease like scurvy can be cured by consuming the missing nutrients. However, it is also proven that some nutrient exposure can caused chronic diseases such as energy, fats, sodium dietary fiber and food exposures etc making it difficult to set dietary guidelines. In addition to some nutrient causing chronic diseases, nondietary factors such as stress, lack of exercise, smoking and other environmental factors are linked to causing chronic disease(Slavin, 2012).…

    • 1520 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The Fast-Food Fight” Some may argue that fast-food has become the new tobacco. Over the years, we have become highly educated on the health related concerns of smoking, as well as the significant health issues associated with overeating. Fast-food consumption has caused great alarm among Americans and is a controversial issue of who is to blame as well as who should take action. Although many critics believe that fast-food consumption is an individual issue and the government should not be involved with one’s personal eating habits, I would argue that some amount of government intervention is needed. While it is understandable that people want to eat what they desire, many people have allowed the convenience and glorification of fast-food in American to take precedence over the unhealthy risks of a fast-food diet.…

    • 1091 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays