Although others may not see it this way, they feel the government should be given access only by permission through citizens. In addition the Fourth Amendment should be able to protect our information from federal law, even if our personal information is available. On another note, the only reason the government should have personal access is if their were suspicious activity.
For example, this statement explains how “...the Constitution's Fourth Amendment, designed to guard against unreasonable searches and seizures, should impede the government's access to personal data--even if that information is available in the commercial sphere. "If Google has it, that says nothing about whether the government should have it," says Cato's Harper. "It's …show more content…
Speaking of security, I’d like to point out that U.S. protection from terrorist and other dangers seem major. After all, ever since we’ve had some terrorist encounters, including batshit crazy events happen in our nation, the government and FBI have been on high alert for skeptical, questionable activity. For instance, let's say an unknown terrorist hacks your computer and gets access to your personal files or on another note the terrorist is planning a massive attack on America, but needs access to federal documents. The government has to keep watch for this sort of activity, and also be aware of our online actions just to be sure the U.S. is not in danger. Another issue circulating is if the “U.S. is Safe From Attack?”, on ABC News John Cohn and Pierre Thomas speak on the matter that “...the FBI is working closely, they're sharing more information than ever with local authorities. They're providing more training than ever with local authorities. They're working to ensure local jurisdictions are ready to deal with active shooter situations. We'll just have to keep working on it... If something happens? The short answer, in D.C., in that case, the answer was no. Federal authorities I talked to were mortified they were not able to get in and get people out more quickly. A huge issue. Going back to one point you made about how you track these people. The FBI has been watching and monitoring travel patterns. They're very robust on the internet, looking at who is posting the radical messages online.”. To sum up this conflict this all relates to the FBI and government officials keeping watch of cameras, and corporations. To say the very least, we are also very vulnerable to some of these attacks, particularly if citizens feel that the government has no right to any information about a citizen
For example, this statement explains how “...the Constitution's Fourth Amendment, designed to guard against unreasonable searches and seizures, should impede the government's access to personal data--even if that information is available in the commercial sphere. "If Google has it, that says nothing about whether the government should have it," says Cato's Harper. "It's …show more content…
Speaking of security, I’d like to point out that U.S. protection from terrorist and other dangers seem major. After all, ever since we’ve had some terrorist encounters, including batshit crazy events happen in our nation, the government and FBI have been on high alert for skeptical, questionable activity. For instance, let's say an unknown terrorist hacks your computer and gets access to your personal files or on another note the terrorist is planning a massive attack on America, but needs access to federal documents. The government has to keep watch for this sort of activity, and also be aware of our online actions just to be sure the U.S. is not in danger. Another issue circulating is if the “U.S. is Safe From Attack?”, on ABC News John Cohn and Pierre Thomas speak on the matter that “...the FBI is working closely, they're sharing more information than ever with local authorities. They're providing more training than ever with local authorities. They're working to ensure local jurisdictions are ready to deal with active shooter situations. We'll just have to keep working on it... If something happens? The short answer, in D.C., in that case, the answer was no. Federal authorities I talked to were mortified they were not able to get in and get people out more quickly. A huge issue. Going back to one point you made about how you track these people. The FBI has been watching and monitoring travel patterns. They're very robust on the internet, looking at who is posting the radical messages online.”. To sum up this conflict this all relates to the FBI and government officials keeping watch of cameras, and corporations. To say the very least, we are also very vulnerable to some of these attacks, particularly if citizens feel that the government has no right to any information about a citizen