Good Vs Evil Vs Free Will Essay

Since the dawn of our creation, the decision to choose between good and evil has been the most vital decision of all time, but what ultimately controls our decisions? Can we explain any decisions we make? This question has been at the core of the social sciences since they first came about. Those in opposition to the social sciences claim free will is the moral choices you make everyday to say yes and no to good and evil. On the other hand, social scientists argue, if you can bring science to how things work, you can bring science to the way humans work while giving us a semi-empirical rationale for our choices. Although many argue the social sciences cannot undo our natural instinct to choose good and evil, the social sciences have ultimately killed off free will. While there are many who believe the human species is innately good and will do anything in their power to choose good over evil, the social sciences have greatly diminished the effects of free will. When given the choice between good and evil, we are most likely to choose good. If the decision is based in free will, and therefore comes from …show more content…
When the social sciences are applied, it becomes less of a coincidence and more of an explanation that those with the same upbringing tend to make the same decisions. While it may be difficult to believe there is a rationale for our choices, the argument becomes more convincing when given the amount of times that the evil choice overpowers the free will to do good. When all is said and done, those in opposition will continue to claim the social sciences cannot undo our natural instinct to choose good and evil. While this may appear true, the social sciences never took our natural instinct away, they simply argued that maybe our natural instinct has less to do with our psyche and more to do with our lived