7. Attitude of 12 members in jury:
JUROR 1 (DEEPAK KEJRIWAL)
1. Co-coordinator, non-partial during the proceedings, facilitator, mediator, soft spoken and believed in democratic decisions with everyone’s consent.
2. A good moderator but he lacked control over the group Because of this; his role was not taken seriously by others
3. He kept his cool throughout the discussion and never fought with anyone and seeks co-operation from others. He is social as he tried to bring everybody to the table and maintained amiable relationship with everyone , interaction with strangers is most as his soft skills are very polished.
JUROR 2 (AMITABH SRIVASTAVA)
1. He is shy by nature,convinced and influenced during stressed moments. He was very keen …show more content…
1. Understanding group dynamics and creating participation and involvement: In themovie, 12 jury members have to reach a consensus. So the consent of every jury member wasrequired. This required an underlined understanding of where the group stood with respect totrust, disclosure and acceptance. Also everyone was individually asked about their views andthey have to give appropriate reasons. Thus involvement of each and every member was there.Participation of each and every member of the group was encouraged. They were forced to sharetheir point of views. . Here also it has been strongly depicted that the group dynamics play ahighly important role in changing the mindset of its members. For example the character playedby PankajKapur was very stringent and stubborn for most of the part of the movie, but the groupwas successful in changing his perception regarding the new generation. I would start the teambuilding process in the movie from the beginning.2. Facilitating better group effectiveness by honing every member’s decision makingabilities: at the beginning of the discussion 11 out of 12 jurors considered the accused to beguilty of murdering his father. The final decision made later shows that even after so manysessions in the court many issues were left unexplored. These were unearthed during this grouptask. This helped the group to make a decision considering all the true facts and hence they wereable to make a fair and just decision. Due to this the innocent boy was realized of all the charges.So as a result of this team work the effectiveness of the group as well as individual decisionmaking ability increased 12 folds.3. Better management and utilization of conflicts by generation of diverse ideas: all thebrainstorming and teamwork helped in exposing all those facts which were not even thought ofduring the entire trial and which finally helped in proving the boy innocent. For example the factthat the lady witness wore spectacles and it would have been
JUROR 1 (DEEPAK KEJRIWAL)
1. Co-coordinator, non-partial during the proceedings, facilitator, mediator, soft spoken and believed in democratic decisions with everyone’s consent.
2. A good moderator but he lacked control over the group Because of this; his role was not taken seriously by others
3. He kept his cool throughout the discussion and never fought with anyone and seeks co-operation from others. He is social as he tried to bring everybody to the table and maintained amiable relationship with everyone , interaction with strangers is most as his soft skills are very polished.
JUROR 2 (AMITABH SRIVASTAVA)
1. He is shy by nature,convinced and influenced during stressed moments. He was very keen …show more content…
1. Understanding group dynamics and creating participation and involvement: In themovie, 12 jury members have to reach a consensus. So the consent of every jury member wasrequired. This required an underlined understanding of where the group stood with respect totrust, disclosure and acceptance. Also everyone was individually asked about their views andthey have to give appropriate reasons. Thus involvement of each and every member was there.Participation of each and every member of the group was encouraged. They were forced to sharetheir point of views. . Here also it has been strongly depicted that the group dynamics play ahighly important role in changing the mindset of its members. For example the character playedby PankajKapur was very stringent and stubborn for most of the part of the movie, but the groupwas successful in changing his perception regarding the new generation. I would start the teambuilding process in the movie from the beginning.2. Facilitating better group effectiveness by honing every member’s decision makingabilities: at the beginning of the discussion 11 out of 12 jurors considered the accused to beguilty of murdering his father. The final decision made later shows that even after so manysessions in the court many issues were left unexplored. These were unearthed during this grouptask. This helped the group to make a decision considering all the true facts and hence they wereable to make a fair and just decision. Due to this the innocent boy was realized of all the charges.So as a result of this team work the effectiveness of the group as well as individual decisionmaking ability increased 12 folds.3. Better management and utilization of conflicts by generation of diverse ideas: all thebrainstorming and teamwork helped in exposing all those facts which were not even thought ofduring the entire trial and which finally helped in proving the boy innocent. For example the factthat the lady witness wore spectacles and it would have been