12 Angry Men Group Analysis

Improved Essays
7. Attitude of 12 members in jury:

JUROR 1 (DEEPAK KEJRIWAL)
1. Co-coordinator, non-partial during the proceedings, facilitator, mediator, soft spoken and believed in democratic decisions with everyone’s consent.
2. A good moderator but he lacked control over the group Because of this; his role was not taken seriously by others
3. He kept his cool throughout the discussion and never fought with anyone and seeks co-operation from others. He is social as he tried to bring everybody to the table and maintained amiable relationship with everyone , interaction with strangers is most as his soft skills are very polished.

JUROR 2 (AMITABH SRIVASTAVA)
1. He is shy by nature,convinced and influenced during stressed moments. He was very keen
…show more content…
1. Understanding group dynamics and creating participation and involvement: In themovie, 12 jury members have to reach a consensus. So the consent of every jury member wasrequired. This required an underlined understanding of where the group stood with respect totrust, disclosure and acceptance. Also everyone was individually asked about their views andthey have to give appropriate reasons. Thus involvement of each and every member was there.Participation of each and every member of the group was encouraged. They were forced to sharetheir point of views. . Here also it has been strongly depicted that the group dynamics play ahighly important role in changing the mindset of its members. For example the character playedby PankajKapur was very stringent and stubborn for most of the part of the movie, but the groupwas successful in changing his perception regarding the new generation. I would start the teambuilding process in the movie from the beginning.2. Facilitating better group effectiveness by honing every member’s decision makingabilities: at the beginning of the discussion 11 out of 12 jurors considered the accused to beguilty of murdering his father. The final decision made later shows that even after so manysessions in the court many issues were left unexplored. These were unearthed during this grouptask. This helped the group to make a decision considering all the true facts and hence they wereable to make a fair and just decision. Due to this the innocent boy was realized of all the charges.So as a result of this team work the effectiveness of the group as well as individual decisionmaking ability increased 12 folds.3. Better management and utilization of conflicts by generation of diverse ideas: all thebrainstorming and teamwork helped in exposing all those facts which were not even thought ofduring the entire trial and which finally helped in proving the boy innocent. For example the factthat the lady witness wore spectacles and it would have been

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The film Twelve Angry Men (1957) exhibited the power of an eyewitness, the characteristics of the defendant, and the power of group influence that affects the jury. Throughout the film, the reliability of the eyewitness was questioned. There were two eyewitnesses in the movie, the old man, who lives in the apartment below of the crime scene, and the old woman, who lives across the street. According to the film, there is a possibility that the eyewitnesses misinformed the jury about the crime scene. Eyewitnesses may not be as reliable as they are thought to be.…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Except for juror number eight, peer pressure impaired their judgment. Based on his maturity level it indicated that the greatest differences are found in juror number eight and three. Once juror (Jack) changed his vote from guilty to not guilty only because the rest of them eventually voted not guilty also. It showed many times that the several jurors changed their minds from not guilty to guilty and vice versa under peer pressure, and overpowering of the strong willed ones.…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There was one juror who refused to side with all the vast majority of other guilty verdicts causing them to stay and talk about the issue at hand. In my opinion, majority sided guilty because it was the easiest way to go and they have families to get back to, bills to pay, and money to be made outside of the courtroom. This situation could have had majority influence if it were not for that one juror saying not guilty. The majority influence is the opposite of minority influence, in which social pressure exerted by the larger portion of the group, directed toward individual members and smaller fractions with the group. In the beginning they asked members of the jury how they felt and you could tell they were unsure but as soon as other men started raising their hands it became clear that they were displaying conformity.…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The leadership during this deliberation is an important role because thanks to juror #1, many times the order was stablished and also to juror #8 the facts were examined. It is important to take this group decision process as a serious things because it can be applied in our daily life, but in this case it was to save somebody’s…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Week 2 Application Assignment: Group Dynamics and Group Stages In 1965, Bruce Tuckman developed one of the most influential models of “the developmental stages in a small group” (Bonebright, 2010, p. 111). It is a four stage model in which each stage needed to be completed in order to reach optimum group functioning. These stages were dubbed “forming”, “storming”, “norming”, “performing”. Later in 1977, he and Mary Ann Conover Jensen added “adjourning” as a fifth stage in his model (Bonebright, 2010).…

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his old age he is able to maintain quiet and observant disposition throughout the play which allows him to catch minor details which others may have overlooked. His observation of the old man witness demonstrates his own experience as an old man who has never been recognised until he was called to participate in a jury. This is affirmed when he says: “I think I know him better than anyone here. This is a quiet old man…newspapers. ”(Act…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I attended the Bertha Strong Stroke Simulation event on March 1, 2016, at the Arizona State University Downtown Phoenix campus held at the Mercado building. I had attended this event in the past thought it would be interesting to compare my experiences. I was surprised to find that my first comparison would be the registration and receipt of materials needed to prepare for the event. It may have been due to familiarity with the process, but the current process seemed more coordinated. The registration process was different; it seems as though the old system had some issues as it has been changed slightly.…

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror 3 Analysis

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages

    However, he has behaviour role which conflict and frustration taken in action has influence his judgement. Moreover, his stubborn and bad temper has effect his decision and drive his vote of guilty. The juror 3 grow angry and nearly attack juror 8 and this action has weakness his support between the jurors. The intuition or feeling which make decisions with heart and escalation of commitment bias which do not admitted to making a wrong decision.…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The role of a Human Resources Sergeant is very important in the Profession of Arms. According to the Army White Paper, the Profession of Arms is a vocation comprised of experts certified in the ethical application of land combat power, serving under civilian authority. (The Profession of Arms, 2010) The Army is an American Profession of Arms. Within the Army there is multiple branches.…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Reflection

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Juror eight has very good observation skills. He almost is a detective juror, he seeks answers and he is good at creating scenarios to find answers. Juror eight gave his reason why he had doubt still, and why the other eleven should look the case over more. Juror eight then wanted to take another vote. He agreed that after his points, if no one else votes none-guilty that he will agree with a guilty verdict also.…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Groupthink In 12 Angry Men

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Society is remarkably quick to judge a situation without thoroughly investigating it. During the movie 12 Angry Men, the old saying that you cannot judge a book by its cover, truly comes to life. This movie shows and explains the process that the jury on each case go through. It shows how each juror goes through the process of determining whether the defendant is guilty or not. Throughout the duration of this paper, you will be provided definitions and examples of three ways that this movie relates to Communications 1010.…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roles In Twelve Angry Men

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Most of the time he is a loud outspoken person with strong beliefs on his own opinions without looking at different perspectives. As a result he can be seen as the stage hog, because he wants to be heard by speaking loud and obnoxiously. He also does not let other jurors speak fully, because their opinions are not clearly important to him. As a result, it caused all the other jurors to turn their backs on him, while he was…

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Negotiation Analysis

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited

    During their whole dispute, they come up with different ways to settle arguments, including going around the table and giving each person a chance to explain why they voted guilty or innocent and using evidence to prove one's point. Juror 8 always had evidence to back up his reasons, which convinced the others that maybe the boy is innocent. The ultimate resolution comes after everyone gives their input and puts all of the pieces together. They gain a different perspective which changes their thoughts on everything. After a long day, they…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By juror #8 not going along with the group, he demonstrates the limits of conformity one of which is the sense of self. Juror #8 showed high self-esteem and leadership that help him to combat the pressure of conformity. After reaching a 11 to 1 vote, the other jurors are quick to criticise juror # 8 but he stands his ground and ask the group to think about the matter a bit more.…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is uncommon to observe somebody who likes to be compelled to be some place or accomplish something they don 't have a longing to do. In, 12 Angry Men, we are given only that. Twelve men, of every single different backgrounds and experiences are told they must spend their own valuable time to judge a man on the premise of evidence that was presented to them. Gladding would call this kind of group an errand/work aggregate. This sort of group meets up to finish amass undertaking objectives.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics