Gomberg's Analysis

Improved Essays
To begin, Gomberg argues that a normal human life and reliable knowledge of the world around us requires us to have two virtues: we must trust what others tell us; we must be modest about what we believe ourselves to know when we recognize we may be wrong. Either we trust what someone is saying, or we deny it and doubt it. In today’s world, most people find it very hard to believe what another person is saying. They’ve came to know their own beliefs and what they believe to be true or not. A lot of situations and cases tend to be doubted because people won’t believe anything until they have their own proof or certainty about He goes on to say that trust in knowledge by testimony is important because testimony is a special way of acquiring knowledge. …show more content…
Not everything that people say we should believe because sometimes, they could be lying. Not everyone is trustworthy and not everyone tells the truth. There are manipulative and vindictive people in this world who will lie about literally anything so it’s up to you to decipher someone who is lying or being honest. Instead of trusting what others say, you should doubt what they say instead. You can’t always believe what someone tells you just because they say so. You must investigate, question, and wonder what the other person is saying and decide for yourself if you’re willing to trust them and what’s coming from their mouth. Gomberg wants us to believe that it’s okay to believe what others say without having any evidence of if what that person is saying is true or not. He’s saying we must trust what others say as if we have no choice to. Different people that we know have different views and beliefs so they tend to believe other things than we do. People that we whom have a reason to trust, believe things that cannot all possibly be true. These conflicts may arise because people typically have different views than others. They believe different things, they were brought up a different way so their values are different, and they grew up believing what they parent told them to believe. To believe something someone says then you must trust that person, to a degree at least. You must trust what the other person is saying and that they know what they’re talking about to believe and trust them. So therefore, in order to trust what others say you must first distinguish if that person is trustworthy and if they actually know what they’re talking about. You can’t trust others just by what they say or if they tell you to believe them, you have to have some type of evidence and know what they’re saying isn’t a

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    I support Jecker and Pagon’s side. Futility and inhumanity have medical and moral meanings and can be useful in deciding whether to continue or withdraw medical intervention. The main goal of a physician is to make sure that their patient benefits from the treatment. Such as in the case they described of Michael, the infant born with prune belly syndrome, the child was not born to live a full and healthy life right from the start. The doctors tried their best in the short three months of his life, but it was next to impossible to remain hopeful of fixing him.…

    • 173 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    They, too, are committed to trust in increasing knowledge” (Coutant,…

    • 1306 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Eyewitness Testimonies

    • 2441 Words
    • 10 Pages

    AFRICAN AMERICANS WRONGLY CONVICTED 3 Why Are African Americans More Likely to Be Wrongly Convicted in the United States? Introduction Imagine, you are just minding your business walking down a street and an officer stop you to bring you to the station to question you. The next thing you know you are being charged for a crime you didn’t commit.…

    • 2441 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In this paper, I will be discussing the popular deceiver argument, and Jonathan Vogel’s response to it. In his article, Vogel describes the deceiver argument and talks the reader through what it is and what it is trying to explain. After he does this, Vogel then goes on to reject the deceiver argument, claiming that premise two of the argument is false. The responses that have been put forth are then discussed by Vogel, most likely trying to come up with a response he deems worthy of being the best response to the deceiver argument. After Vogel finds his response of choice, he goes on to briefly explain it.…

    • 1354 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “Reasonable Religious Disagreements,” Richard Feldman posits that two reasonable peers cannot come to a reasonable disagreement. The premise of a “reasonable disagreement” has various conditions, in short being that the peers must be epistemic, and they must have shared all of their evidence pertaining to the argument. By this criteria, it is not plausible for two epistemic peers with access to the same body of evidence to ever reach reasonably different conclusions. However, a problem arises with the previously stated criteria when examining the point regarding full disclosure of evidence. When examining Feldman’s article from this perspective, it is possible that it may not be considered fully viable.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By expecting the audience to trust him, his lack of ethos in his article leaves doubt in the mind of his reader making them ask “okay, why should we trust you?”. The author also does not use any jargon that is in association with making his point he only uses lower level diction with the exception of one or two…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Defense, Critique and Integration of the 4 Apologetic Methods Defense of Fideism To approach apologetics is to seek to fulfill the command of Scripture “always being prepared to make a defense to anyone who asks you for a reason for the hope that is in you” In light of this, the believer ought to approach apologetics as the overflow of their relationship with Jesus. Approaching apologetics from the fideist perspective is to embrace the mystery and paradox of knowing God in faith, rather than through an extended philosophically rooted line of reasoning. Instead of using human means to explain the reality which is far above human understanding, fideist seek to share their encounter with Jesus, the ultimate reality, rather than attempting to…

    • 2020 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Graded Assignment Journal, Part 1: Night The questions in this Journal Assignment cover readings in Lessons 1–4 in Night (Sections 1–3 of the text). You will need to turn in this assignment after you complete Lesson 4 of this unit. Your answers should be a minimum of 5 sentences and include examples from the text. (Remember to use APE: Answer, Prove, Explain).…

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thus I lean more towards believing in Clifford’s rationalization that we should never fully believe something until we have sufficient evidence. The idea of Epistemology…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Generally, Clifford is right that believing without sufficient evidence is wrong, but there…

    • 1624 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    n “The Ways We Lie,” author Stephanie Ericsson does a great job of explaining how and why everyone lies. Ericsson makes serval points that lying isn’t necessarily bad, however sometimes lies can have severer consequences. For this particular writing the audience is everybody, because she argues that everyone lies. Ericsson’s use of historical events provide logos or logical reasoning. She also apples to pathos by reaching to her audience emotions.…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Judging solely by the title, Kekla Magoon’s novel How It Went Down seemingly implies a factual description of how an event occurred. By utilizing a polyvocal narrative consisting of various demographics and intertwining relationships, Magoon rather portrays a lack of collective understanding of the detrimental incident of an African-American teenager being shot to death. Through giving personal viewpoints and opinions of many characters, the novel illustrates the manner in which emotions, varying relationships, and underlying racism can affect one’s judgment or perception of such an occurrence they are bearing witness to. These variables are also shown to affect the perceptions of people who did not directly witness the incident, but are impacted…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Karolina I. Pellot Ortiz Professor Matthew Goodwin English 3221-705 September 17, 2015 Faith Based on Cultural Opinion Is there truly one simple way to explain a religion? Which opinion is right and which one is wrong? These are the types of questions that you, or anyone else, might ask when trying to describe your religious beliefs.…

    • 2017 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The periscope of interest for this paper is Friedrich Nietzsche’s article, “On Truth and Lies in a Nonmoral Sense.” Nietzsche was categorized as a post-modern philosopher who, through his works, had a tremendous influence on Western philosophy. The particular piece of writing discussed here deals with the relationship that human language has on the formation of truths and lies. The meaning behind the text, if true, essentially makes us rethink everything we think we know. “On Truth and Lies in a Nonmoral Sense” is Nietzsche’s explanation of how and why humans have created their own perceptions of truths and lies.…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Concepts are not mental images, but not word like entities either. Concepts are mental representations. The dictionary refers to a concept as a general idea or notion that corresponds to some class of entities that consist of characteristics or essential features of class . But it is not just a general idea. They, in fact, shape the way we live, through the way we think, act, judge, and more.…

    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays