Throughout the drama, Goldman uses idiolect to vary the personalities of the characters. He especially utilizes the idiolect and thought processes of England’s nobility in order to show the varying levels of knowledge in treaties, land, and power. Henry II, being the King of England, displays a great sense of knowledge in the status of his empire as well as how to negotiate with neighboring countries. For example, when meeting with King Philip of France, Henry began the negotiations, stating, “Your grievances, as we have understood them, have to do with Princess Alais and her dowry” (13). Henry’s professional tone and use of political terms, such as “dowry”, project a sense of confidence that gives England the status of being flexible in negotiations,
…show more content…
With Goldman’s incorporation of idiolect throughout his varying sentence style, the reader becomes a bystander within the palace walls, listening to every plot and conspiracy comprising the drama’s central conflict of determining England’s next king. Not only does idiolect show the level of education behind a character, but their use of English and French also conveys the characters’ education and professionalism concerning England’s political situation. With his use of both idiolect and foreign language, Goldman gives the reader insight as to who may be the best deceivers within the drama’s deceptive battles. However, despite the trickery and slyness pervading the subject, the prideful and selfish roots of deceit are clearly found to be inherently fixed into each character’s personality. For example, when Richard warned Henry that he will be king in any situation, he said, “I don’t care what you offer Philip. I don’t care what plans you make. I’ll have the Aquitaine and Alais and the crown. I’ll have them all” (15). Through the speeches of Richard as well as the other members of the royal family, arrogance and presumed privilege radiate from their selfish desires and prideful attitudes. Through the clashing of egos and the characters’ entanglement in their web of deceit, Goldman indirectly warns his reader of the consequences deriving from conceit and deception, giving them hindsight on what divisive tragedies may happen if one becomes engrossed in
With Goldman’s incorporation of idiolect throughout his varying sentence style, the reader becomes a bystander within the palace walls, listening to every plot and conspiracy comprising the drama’s central conflict of determining England’s next king. Not only does idiolect show the level of education behind a character, but their use of English and French also conveys the characters’ education and professionalism concerning England’s political situation. With his use of both idiolect and foreign language, Goldman gives the reader insight as to who may be the best deceivers within the drama’s deceptive battles. However, despite the trickery and slyness pervading the subject, the prideful and selfish roots of deceit are clearly found to be inherently fixed into each character’s personality. For example, when Richard warned Henry that he will be king in any situation, he said, “I don’t care what you offer Philip. I don’t care what plans you make. I’ll have the Aquitaine and Alais and the crown. I’ll have them all” (15). Through the speeches of Richard as well as the other members of the royal family, arrogance and presumed privilege radiate from their selfish desires and prideful attitudes. Through the clashing of egos and the characters’ entanglement in their web of deceit, Goldman indirectly warns his reader of the consequences deriving from conceit and deception, giving them hindsight on what divisive tragedies may happen if one becomes engrossed in