Religion
The majority of Americans today believe that religion can answer most of their problems. As the percentages rise, Multiple Americans believe religion can answer several problems they have experienced nowadays. Although, for those who believe religion is to be outdated have slowly chosen a different approach, but faith has remained as an important part of life for half of Americans. Between those who have assumed religion is extremely important in their lives, have strong belief in its ability to solve modern issues. Religion solving today’s issues may not necessarily be true; in fact, it is society choosing the results. In the book, God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything inscribed by Christopher Hitchens carries to the text, …show more content…
Throughout Hitchens book, multiple evidence has been stated how religion is to blame, but it also proves how god didn’t create atrocities, the people did.
TOPIC SENTENCE: Hitchens believes god invented people intended to create issues, but humans are the one at fault. MAIN POINT #1: Christopher Hitchens believes without the correct evidence, he is unsure what is true. SUPPORTING SENTENCE: Hitchens proclaimed, “What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence”(Hitchens 150). ELABOARTING SENTENCE: Stating, people assume most of the time, but not all things asserted without evidence are dismissed, although, they, certainly, can be. People mostly want evidence when others seek the truth, but societies today mainly seek for others things like justice, comfort, safety, and trust. When a person undertakes that god did it, there is never evidence to prove he is the one at fault. MAIN POINT #2: Also, Hitchens considers that religion kills, since evidence was religion at cause. SUPPORTING SENTENCE: Hitchens identified, “Thus, though I dislike to differ with such a great man, Voltaire was simply ludicrous when he said that …show more content…
A NEUTRAL: Several opponents of Hitchens argue that modern issues have occurred for that religion has directed a person resulting them to create problems throughout cities. A NAUTRAL STATEMENT AND EXPLANATION: I argue that religion can’t be at fault for a person’s mistake. Religion services people to become a better person; religion does not command a person to blow up a city. All the incidents that have occurred throughout the world were man made. AN ANALYISIS: The dichotomy between religions kills and that people kill is evidence has shown people being the ones at fault for the disaster. A PROPOSAL: I propose that we resolve the issue of the religion being the cause of killings, is that we notice who is at fault and should seek strong evidence. Opponents of Hitchens could benefit in the long run by seeking others perspectives; hence they could be a open minded person to accept another persons
The majority of Americans today believe that religion can answer most of their problems. As the percentages rise, Multiple Americans believe religion can answer several problems they have experienced nowadays. Although, for those who believe religion is to be outdated have slowly chosen a different approach, but faith has remained as an important part of life for half of Americans. Between those who have assumed religion is extremely important in their lives, have strong belief in its ability to solve modern issues. Religion solving today’s issues may not necessarily be true; in fact, it is society choosing the results. In the book, God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything inscribed by Christopher Hitchens carries to the text, …show more content…
Throughout Hitchens book, multiple evidence has been stated how religion is to blame, but it also proves how god didn’t create atrocities, the people did.
TOPIC SENTENCE: Hitchens believes god invented people intended to create issues, but humans are the one at fault. MAIN POINT #1: Christopher Hitchens believes without the correct evidence, he is unsure what is true. SUPPORTING SENTENCE: Hitchens proclaimed, “What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence”(Hitchens 150). ELABOARTING SENTENCE: Stating, people assume most of the time, but not all things asserted without evidence are dismissed, although, they, certainly, can be. People mostly want evidence when others seek the truth, but societies today mainly seek for others things like justice, comfort, safety, and trust. When a person undertakes that god did it, there is never evidence to prove he is the one at fault. MAIN POINT #2: Also, Hitchens considers that religion kills, since evidence was religion at cause. SUPPORTING SENTENCE: Hitchens identified, “Thus, though I dislike to differ with such a great man, Voltaire was simply ludicrous when he said that …show more content…
A NEUTRAL: Several opponents of Hitchens argue that modern issues have occurred for that religion has directed a person resulting them to create problems throughout cities. A NAUTRAL STATEMENT AND EXPLANATION: I argue that religion can’t be at fault for a person’s mistake. Religion services people to become a better person; religion does not command a person to blow up a city. All the incidents that have occurred throughout the world were man made. AN ANALYISIS: The dichotomy between religions kills and that people kill is evidence has shown people being the ones at fault for the disaster. A PROPOSAL: I propose that we resolve the issue of the religion being the cause of killings, is that we notice who is at fault and should seek strong evidence. Opponents of Hitchens could benefit in the long run by seeking others perspectives; hence they could be a open minded person to accept another persons