The Reason Series Analysis

Improved Essays
Segment one of The Reason Series exposed me to the reality that everyone sees God and science in different ways. It reminded me that there will be people in the world that tell you to choose between God and science. That is not the case. You do not need to choose one or the other. People try to disprove the existence of God all the time. But disproving something is a lot harder than proving something. Science cannot prove that God isn’t real because science can only prove things in our universe and God isn’t in our universe. One thing that really spoke to me in the video was that nothing can come from nothing, and the universe had to have a beginning. After watching this video, I still struggle to fully understand that God has been and will …show more content…
It taught me that you either look at everything and see a miracle or see nothing. It took us back to segment one when we learned that nothing can come from nothing, so our universe had to have a beginning. Throughout the segment, it continually answered questions and contradictions that would arise. This proved to me that there are answers for everything that works in the favor of both theology and science. Segment two also introduced me to the idea that both space and time are expanding. The BVG theorem taught me that the universe expands more than it contracts in its lifetime. Meaning, the universe can be eternal into the future but not into the past. Again, this had me thinking about how God is infinite and out universe had to have some sort of beginning. Overall, this segment answered the few questions I had and taught me that inflation without a beginning is …show more content…
It taught me that some people do not believe in evolution because they think the Bible is giving literal truths and that it contradicts the Bible. Again, we learned that science, or evolution in this case, does not contradict the Bible because the Bible is seeking and exploring theology, not science. One thing I do not completely understand yet is how nonliving things become living things, unconscious things become conscious things, and living things become humans that have a relationship with God. Although that confused me, I was amazed to learn why evolution can’t account for our souls. Evolution is a physical, material process, while the soul is a spiritual reality and outside our body, thus evolution can’t account for our souls. This led to the topic of near death experiences, which gave more proof of the existence of human souls. Near death experiences proved the existence of human souls because they do not have a physical or biological origin; People are no longer afraid of death afterwards and are able to see things they wouldn’t have seen otherwise. It was really interesting to learn these stories, facts, and evidence of near death experiences because up until now, I thought near death experiences were just events in movies, not real life experiences. Overall, I learned that it is logical that God exists and that we have both a divine and eternal purpose, because of our soul that will

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    POPPER, KUHN AND LATOUR'S EVALUATION OF THE ARGUMENTS Popper's philosophy is based on falsifiability, thus he would side with Lennox. There are a lot of gaps in the science when it comes to evolution and the origin of life. There are also a lot of phenomenons that Dawkins cannot explain by using pure science, because he believes that the specific explanations have not been discovered yet. Lennox uses falsifiability as his main argument in many situations to counter Dawkins' theories. Lennox uses God to explain all of these phenomenons and because God cannot be falsified by using science, Popper would side with Lennox rather than Dawkins.…

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Life of Pi tried to make a significant argument of why God did exists. Thomas Aquinas showed me different sides to many arguments about God. Finally, my conversation with Olivia helped confirm my opinions. I do not believe that God exists because there is no higher power that has enough control to influence the entire world. I completely disagree with everything that the book Life of Pi states because…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Without faith, we would not believe in ourselves, let a long anything else. Some have asked me what came first God or faith? God created me and I have faith in God, so both. Fideism is a a reliance of faith rather than reason in matters of religion and philosophy. As I stated previously, history has shown us how to be critical thinkers and rationalists, and go from there.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is a fact of our existence that he the God must exists and in order to satisfy myself, that I exists it is imperative to first prove the existence of my own creator. And being an atheist is as you are doubting your own existence. Than who is right? Everybody carries either of the opinion because there is only two options in this category. In my case god exists, because of my own existence, due to the nature itself, the big bang and because he should exist, and because of the science of human being itself, or everything is just a dream.…

    • 1938 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Contingent beings require a necessary being as their ultimate cause.” (3) There are several objections to this theory. The first argument is the atheistic claim that the universe has always existed. This objection can only go against the temporal forms of the argument though. The non-temporal form of the cosmological argument does not deal with the concept of time, and is able to stand up to this objection. The second argument is that if everything in the universe needs a cause, then so must God.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    For the questions “Can Science disprove God?”, “Is there any evidence for a Creator in the universe?”, and “Is the Universe Random and Meaningless?” the answers and points brought up made complete sense and totally proved that faith and reason could in fact be compatible. However, on the questions “Does the Bible conflict with science?” and “Does the Bible conflict with Evolution?” the reasoning behind them did not really make sense to me, for it seemed that they answered questions that had nothing to do with the original topic instead of actually answering the essential question. Before watching this series, I could not answer the question “Does science disprove God?” because I had never been educated on that topic, but now that I am educated I can say for certain that faith and reason can be compatible, that is on certain topics. When asked to rate myself on a scale, I rated myself as a three and a half because I knew there was a God, yet I also had some doubts and was aware that there were some things I still did not fully understand. Now, after watching the segments, I would rate myself at a two.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dawkins: Writing In recent discussion of Dawkins’ “Arguments about God’s existence”, a controversial issue has been whether he offers a strong and valid argument about religion. Some argue that his paper is filled with false assertions about religion and the existence of God. From this perspective, Dawkins is proving that God doesn’t exist on false claims such as heredity and Agnostic beliefs. On the other hand, however, others argue that his arguments stem from logic and reason. That one needs evidence to prove that something exists and a lack of evidence against God not existing doesn’t prove that God does exist.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The argument that God brought about the universe is somewhat unconvincing and contradictory. Although the argument lays a clear conclusion, it potentially creates more problems than answers. Many find the argument useless, leaving people nothing, and continuing to question the initial first cause. The single most important objection given towards the cosmological argument lies within the question of who created God? Other than the clear statement that God was the initial cause for all things that exist, it appears God is exempt from causation.…

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since there is no trace of evidence, God cannot exist. In fact, science blatantly disproves religion because there are traces of science everywhere, evolutionists study it every day. Religion builds its claim on science and tweaks it along the way. Now after reading this statement, one might argue miracles are a strong form of evidence for the ontological argument. What exactly does a miracle entail?…

    • 1212 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Religion Vs. Science

    • 1922 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Religious leaders started to worry that as science progressed, its discoveries would discredit the Lord. Thus, a misunderstanding of science arose. In reality, science answers the “important” questions of life while religion deals with the “hard” question. Important questions such as “what does it take to sustain life?” are different from hard questions like “what is the purpose of life?” Science can provide information which can be used to help make a decision but frequently cannot tell you what to decide. Humans have spiritual needs that can be dealt by religion but not by science.…

    • 1922 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics