Clemenceau, David Lloyd George's Success At The Paris Peace Conference

Improved Essays
The differing goals of Georges Clemenceau, David Lloyd George and Woodrow Wilson was a catalyst the arising problems at the Paris Peace Conference. The conference was an international meeting convened on January 19, 1919 in Versailles which is located on the outskirts of Paris. The purpose of the meeting was to establish the terms of peace after World War One. France’s Prime Minister Clemenceau had one primary goal, which was to ensure that German never invaded France and to punish Germany severely. However, Lloyd George; the Prime Minister of Britain aimed to maintain their own security, unity and interests and desired ‘justice’ for the allies. The objectives of Clemenceau and Lloyd George contradicted those of the President of the United …show more content…
He believed that Germany’s economy had to be restored to its stable financial condition before the war, but still aimed to weaken its military forces. This is due to the fact that Germany had been strong international trading partners. If harsh reparations were to be inflicted on Germany, Britain would be deprived of essential resources. Yet, populist and capitalist views clashed. The civilians of Britain asserted that the prime minister was being “too lenient “towards Germany; the vanquished enemy. The public urged a harsh peace against Germany, and reparations for the losses that the British suffered. Thus, Lloyd George had to adhere to the likes of the population, which is demonstrated in Source A, “Lloyd George …left him in no …show more content…
He forwarded the creation of a ‘League of Nations’, which would allow international leaders to discuss their issues without the need for conflict. In order to achieve this, Wilson promoted a “safe world” and that the war “would end all wars” through the implemented of the 14 Points. This is seen in Source B, which mentions that Wilson had a “unselfish and idealistic spirit”. However, it is essential to note that The United States of America was becoming the most powerful nation internationally and Wilson was attempting to increase the authority the country possessed. He knew that by creating peace, trade opportunities would be generated and America would collect substantial debts from the Allies and other European countries. Wilson merely considered German’s reparations and deteriorated economy as he was aware that they would be imputed into France’s and Britain’s economy. Clemenceau and Lloyd George did not accept Wilson’s vision as they believed that he was unaware and disillusioned with the damaged caused in France and Britain. This was the result of ‘isolationism’ in America and their separation from European affairs until late end of the conflict. Ultimately, America did not have to rebuild their economy and towns after the war. Despite this, Clemenceau and Lloyd George did not express their disagreements as they had very limited options economically, and had to support America who

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Treaty of Versailles favored recompense over reconciliation and required that Germany accept responsibility not only for itself, but also for its allies exhibiting all the loss and damage onto the nations impacted from the war. France and Britain felt that it was important that Germany admit its leadership role in coordinating the devastating acts that were taken against British and French citizens at the hands of the military forces of Germany, Russia, and Italy. To them, it was not enough that Germany sign a treaty…

    • 1419 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The treaty of Versailles was created with the intention of weakening Germany. On one side some people considered that the treaty was unfair to Germany, as they weren’t the only country responsible for starting the war. On the other hand Germany caused a lot of damage, and people thought that Germany should be treaty harshly to prevent it from starting another war. The Treaty of Versailles was that was used to achieve each powers interest such as Germany’s navy being reduced so that it wouldn’t represent such a great threat to Germany, and Germany being weakened so France could have its revenge. The powers left the conference feeling that they weren’t able to create a treaty that would help keep the peace, and now a days historians blame the treaty of Versailles for helping cause World War 2.…

    • 1674 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Had the Allies lost, they would have defaulted on these loans, resulting in calamitous losses for American companies. As the president, Wilson was required to protect the industry and the livelihood of Americans, justifying his position on joining the war. Similar to the situation with unrestricted submarine warfare, the threat Germany posed to the economy also supported the cause for a world “safe for democracy”. First, since the Allied Powers were commercial allies, German control of the sea limited free commerce. Furthermore, the threat of a German victory, as previously stated, would result in the failed repayment of debts.…

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the 1930s successive British governments adopted appeasement as their policy for dealing with Germany in the hope that it would prevent another war on the scale of the Great War. Pacifist attitudes among the British public was one reasons for this policy, however there were other reasons such as the fact that Britain implemented appeasement as Hitler’s demands appeared justifiable, the British military was not ready for war and Britain was lacking in reliable allies that would support them should war breakout. Finally, a fear of Communism spreading from Russia also prompted Britain’s policy of appeasement. This essay will argue that while pacifism did influence the government, it is more realistic to argue that it was these factors combined…

    • 1259 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The treaty of Versailles war very important since it ended world war one, but it also was one reason Hitler was able to come into power and start world war two. The treaty of Versailles also created the league of nations which was made to prevent future wars but failed due to low support. The treaty put a huge burden on the German people which caused them to want revenge since they lost the Rhineland to France and had to pay a large sum of money, because of this Hitler was able to gain a large support since in the beginning his goal was to basically eradicate the damage the treaty of Versailles did to…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Britain also controlled a powerful fleet which had set up an economic blockade of Germany. Because trade no longer existed with Germany at the time, war-related goods escalated greatly which would be able to pull America’s economy out of their current dilemma. Roosevelt, on the other hand, wanted to be included in the war. With the United States still trying to climb out of the depression, he wanted to protect his investments he had with Britain. One part of the Neutrality Act of 1937, allowed nations to acquire any items by having them pay and carry them away.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He had wanted Germany to lose its navy and its colonies - the powerful navy threatened the British Empire. Regarding the victors’ point of view, it should be noted once more that if the treaty had requested exactly what France and Britain had wanted out of it in the first place Germany would have not recovered. Another factor to consider is whether or not the treaty was seen as justified at the time. The way Germany had treated Russia in the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk in 1918 was very severe and the Treaty of Versailles was more justified and fair. This caused many to consider Germany as operating on double standards and consequently, much less felt sympathy.…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Germans had also invaded France in 1870/1871, which also led to this hostility. Lloyd George held the middle ground, as he felt compelled to agree to a harsh peace due to public opinion at home, but he saw Germany as a strong trading partner, and a harsh peace would destroy the German economy, thus hurting the rest of Europe as well. (Pema Dechen Rapten, n.d.) This led to a very flawed treaty that benefited nobody and would prove to be very costly…

    • 2095 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aware that Germany would probably not be able to pay such a towering debt, nevertheless they feared rapid recovery(Gale),” this alludes to the fact that the allied powers knew that Germany would regain what it had lost and may even declare a second war, so they use the peace treaty to we could Gemini and gain power and resources. The only way to weaken Germany was blaming it for the war and as a punishment taking everything at once had the Alec powers knew that Germany was one of the strongest opposers and they used this treaty as a way to…

    • 1273 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Sleepwalkers Summary

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The historian uses the attacks on Louvain to highlight the senseless destruction of culture from the war, which was inconvenient to all parties as a result of their interlinking economies. However, countries, such as Russia, underestimated the future impact the war and saw in it advantages such as ending tensions or uniting their countries. Similar to Clark, MacMillan also explains the complications of holding Germany as the responsible party and how this is an ongoing debate to this…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays