and China would just be wasting money and time on these clean energy sources, considering that this would not stop the problem of air pollution entirely. However, the excessive demand on a healthier environment is enough to want to bring somewhat of a positive change. It is not right to purely reject this alternative on the grounds that it will not completely solve the problem. Change is possible, one step at a time. If we place this solution in one of the main air-polluting countries, it is guaranteed that there will be a significant positive change. As the article “The Globalization of Pollution” states: “In Los Angeles, that increased pollution was responsible for causing at least one extra day of smog per year that exceeded federal ozone limits.” Getting rid of the energy resources these factories are using and replacing them with cleaner energy resources will decrease pollution dramatically, and accordingly, decrease the amount of smog in the western region of the United
and China would just be wasting money and time on these clean energy sources, considering that this would not stop the problem of air pollution entirely. However, the excessive demand on a healthier environment is enough to want to bring somewhat of a positive change. It is not right to purely reject this alternative on the grounds that it will not completely solve the problem. Change is possible, one step at a time. If we place this solution in one of the main air-polluting countries, it is guaranteed that there will be a significant positive change. As the article “The Globalization of Pollution” states: “In Los Angeles, that increased pollution was responsible for causing at least one extra day of smog per year that exceeded federal ozone limits.” Getting rid of the energy resources these factories are using and replacing them with cleaner energy resources will decrease pollution dramatically, and accordingly, decrease the amount of smog in the western region of the United