I’m glad to see that the Court “again consider[s] the right to abortion” and “understand[s] the controversial nature of the problem” in their Hellerstedt decision. It is illogical that the Supreme Court continues to rule in such a progressive manner and concedes that “millions of Americans believe that life begins at conception,” and “recoil at the thought of a law that would permit it.” In doing so, the Court promotes itself as a haven for hypocrisy. Instead of further reiterating my legal and moral convictions against abortion, I will respond to Justice GINSBURG’s propositions, state the Supreme Court’s threat to the branch of government it represents, and explore what the Court ignored – the doctrine of res judicata and the state’s silenced
