However, despite multiple Congressional attempts to complete these objectives, the amendment never ended up being passed and Buckley v. Valeo still remains as a landmark decision in American jurisprudence. Buckley has particular significance, in addition to being the first Supreme Court case in which campaign finance was addressed, as being the first case in which the Supreme Court asserted two notions that it has largely carried through to recent decisions: (1) the Court rejected the protection and promotion of fairness and equality in campaigns as a purpose for limiting campaign finance spending, and (2) the Court held that money was a protected form of speech under the 1st amendment. These decisions adopted by the Court for the first time in Buckley have largely steered Supreme Court decisions in related cases ever
However, despite multiple Congressional attempts to complete these objectives, the amendment never ended up being passed and Buckley v. Valeo still remains as a landmark decision in American jurisprudence. Buckley has particular significance, in addition to being the first Supreme Court case in which campaign finance was addressed, as being the first case in which the Supreme Court asserted two notions that it has largely carried through to recent decisions: (1) the Court rejected the protection and promotion of fairness and equality in campaigns as a purpose for limiting campaign finance spending, and (2) the Court held that money was a protected form of speech under the 1st amendment. These decisions adopted by the Court for the first time in Buckley have largely steered Supreme Court decisions in related cases ever