Analysis Of Get A Knife Get A Dog But Rid Of Guns

Improved Essays
In “Get a Knife Get a Dog, but Rid of Guns” written by Molly Ivins, She strongly speaks

out against the use of guns. In this story, there are many times when the writer contradicts herself

when she is trying to prove her point. This story is mainly about how the writer thinks no civilian

should have the right to own a gun. She thinks that regular people are not responsible enough to

own a gun and that is why they should be outlawed. Throughout the story I felt that guns should

be regulated but not outlawed, even though they are very detrimental to our nation. In this essay I

will touch on such topics as: What is protection, why guns should be illegal, the different

between knives and guns, and the saying “guns don’t kill people”.

At
…show more content…
The children of our nation are left to fend for themselves in the dangerous times we live in.

There are kids who are violated everyday that feel that have no sense of protection.

Besides protection should guns be outlawed and/or illegal? She has not read or

researched everything fully because the majority of the people who have guns own valid permits.

There are laws passed limiting the selling of guns to certain people such as minors and men or

women convicted of a felony. The writer thinks that only a well regulated [military] militia

should handle or own guns. If only the armed forces had ownership of guns where that will leave

the police department? The law enforcement in this nation is a big part of the balance and order

in our nation. The police would not have access to guns because they are the one who upholds

the law and the law would stat that policemen are not to be armed. If criminals have access to

illegal guns and will acquire them, then the police who are lawfully unarmed will have no

protection. This will cause an uneven shift in crime and punishment, throwing off the
…show more content…
Although she thinks guns should be illegal and/or outlawed, she also has an unorthodox

belief that it is better to be assaulted by someone with a knife than a gun. This thought is

ridiculous because either way the people look at it they’re being assaulted by a deadly weapon.

She points out that she would like the opportunity to run from her assailant. If she was assaulted

they would have to catch her giving her a chance to run to safety. There is no way you can

rationalize being attacked by any weapon. The writer tried to use humor to take away from the

seriousness of the subject. This let the reader’s know how serious she really is about the subject

of safety.

The three views I stated earlier brings me to the infamous saying “Do guns kill people?”

Molly Ivins thinks that guns kill people and people have nothing to do with it. It is impossible to

believe that human beings have nothing to do with guns killing people. I know for a fact that

guns don’t make decisions and decide who and for what reason they are going to kill. If guns

were never created by people, then people wouldn’t have to worry about them. If guns

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Lately, it seems that every time you turn on the television, there is an incidence of gun violence in the news. School shootings, domestic violences, and other forms of firearm brutality make up most of the content displayed in the media, calling for a possible increase in gun control in the United States. This controversial subject has become a common topic of debate all over the country: should civilian-use of violent firearms be limited or prohibited, or should the decision to possess these guns be up to the individual person? There are many arguments supporting and opposing the government 's right to restrict the rights that the Constitution imposes. Some argue that taking weapons away from the people is a violation of the Second Amendment, while others argue that guns have changed too much over time for the allowances of the…

    • 1742 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Society has been split into two over whether or not guns should be banned, but there needs to be a solution where both parties can be happy. Anti-gun advocates present reasoning why guns should be banned. McMahan’s main two arguments of why guns should be banned: one, guns in the community creates a more dangerous environment; and two, the police have less of a power to protect citizens when society has guns (Shafer-Landau, The Ethical Life (EL) 390). McMahan explains that communities are not going to be free of crimes with more people carrying around guns, because criminals will be more prepared, efficient, and quicker to grab and shoot their target (Shafer-Landau, EL 392-392). People with guns will be safer than people without guns, because they do not have a gun to protect themselves.…

    • 1631 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Frisking The essay “Just Take Away Their Guns” has been written by James Q. Wilson. The essay tends to highlight the political and social concerns that are associated with the carrying of a gun. The author claims that there is no need of civilians carrying a gun since it is the responsibility of law and order unit to keep security of citizens. He argues that, in case civilians are involved in the act of carrying guns, then it makes no difference amid them and criminals.…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper, I will be analyzing and criticizing the argument given by Jeff McMahan in his paper “Why Gun ‘Control’ Is Not Enough”. This essay goes against my personal bias and strives to support an argument in favor of private gun ownership to a certain extent. McMahan is hasty in deciding that a complete ban is necessary to restore order and peace; I refute his conclusion by showing that a gun ban would not be able to stop the ongoing need for safety and because of this an increase in gun control policy would be the best solution to the gun problem in the United States. One portion of the paper provides a summary of the argument given by McMahan in his paper in depth, evaluating his premises and conclusion to establish the position the…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philadelphia is proud of the reputation of being “the city of brotherly love”, with the LOVE park and sign right in Center City. However, Philly has gained a reputation for something else in recent years that have brought this nickname into a question; this city has become an example of rising gun violence, with constant shootings and multiple deaths. Every day and night, people are shot and often even killed for various and sometimes mysterious reasons. The city of brotherly love is in desperate need of more control of armed weapons, because gun violence has led to an increase in violence and deaths, weapons are too easy to obtain, and the police are being rendered powerless to stop the rising shootings. Mayor Nutter of Philadelphia is…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    You just dropped your kid off for school around 8 in the morning. You tell your child “I love you” and send him into school. When pulling out of the school parking lot u see a suspicious van pull into the school, you don't do anything and keep going on your way. Then 30 minutes later you get a phone call from the police……. To be continued.…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Right to Bear Arms The argument that “outlawing guns will leave only criminals with guns”, has been debated over and over throughout the years without a truly clear answer being reached. As tragedies such as school shootings in Connecticut, Pennsylvania, and more recently Florida become more and more common place, gun control laws have become the focal point of national concern, and call for more gun control laws has gotten louder and louder. The Constitution grants American’s the right to bear arms, but over the years these rights have become infringed upon as new laws are passed in response to specific acts and the call for new safety measures. Guns rights are a constitutional privilege that should not be regulated for unnecessary reasons…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    William S. LaPierre from “Crime is the Basic Problem, Not Guns” claims that, “America has a crime problem, not a gun problem.” Anti-gun activists believe that by taking guns away the crime rate will drop. They believe it is too dangerous for the public especially for our children. If a new gun law were to be put in place, one that would state that guns are illegal, crime would most likely not change. People would be left defenseless against criminals.…

    • 1626 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun control in America is a significant issue, with an average of 91 gun related deaths per day, it is a matter that can no longer be ignored. Being controversial in its nature, author Phoebe Maltz Bovy doesn 't hesitate to shed light on her opinion on the affair. In her article “It’s Time to Ban Guns. Yes, All of Them.” Bovy is quick to state that all guns are bad regardless of their purpose or the respective owner, that they’re all nothing more than dangerous machines.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Shall not be infringed “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” (“The Bill of Rights: A Transcription”); this is a quote from the bill of rights that explains the right of all US citizens to own firearms. There is a reason that the bill of rights was created, and to talk about stripping anyone of something listed in the bill of rights is ridiculous. Should the government also do away with freedom of speech because it is dangerous to national security? The obvious answer is no; Citizens need to take a stand for their rights, especially important ones such as the second amendment. Numerous gun control advocates do not even know valid in depth…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Guns vs People “ Guns don’t kill people; people kill people”. It is a phrase often heard among the opponents to gun control in the United States. Weapons have been seen as an element of subsistence or defense against any threat, and every day we hear or see related violent crimes involving firearms.…

    • 1370 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Gun Control During recent elections the Second Amendment was at the center of many political debates. Anti-gun politicians used the horrible examples of recent school shootings and terrorist acts such as the Florida night club shooting to scare people into increasing gun control. On the other hand, pro-Second Amendment politicians used scare tactics of losing the right to bear arms and the fear to not be able to fight if need be, to try to win votes.…

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    "When the law disarms good guys, bad guys rejoice." ~Ted Nugent. What do you thing about gun control? Guns should not be ban or taken away they should have certain requirements. Guns are our personal rights and they are our Second Amendment.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In recent years, a lot of debate had been going on about the laws pertaining to firearms. Unfortunately, with all of the mass shootings and killings being reported by the media, guns are given a bad reputation. Sadly, many people believe that they should be illegal because they are dangerous and can kill people, but what these people don’t realize is making them illegal will do a lot more harm than good. Guns have created a balance in society and if we were to take them away it could cause a lot of chaos which would result in more crime and more casualties. People deserve the right to bear arms because with proper training one could possibly save his/her life and also protect others.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Firearm debates have run rampant in the past few years, people are starting to feel safe in their place in society. Unknowingly devising their own downfall, allowing others to choose their gun rights without a say. In her op-ed piece, "Get a Knife, Get a Dog, but Get Rid of Guns" Molly Ivins argues that guns are not protected by the second amendment; and that you 're well within your means to defend yourself without them. I whole heartily disagree with Ivins ' views on guns, and believe guns are a fundamental right and necessity for today 's society. I believe everyone has a right to their opinion, and if it 's supported by factual information can 't be denied.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics