Gerrymandering: In The Pursuit Of Power

Improved Essays
In the pursuit of power, politicians will lie, cheat, and cross lines to get what they want. In some cases they will even draw the lines, literally. A process called Gerrymandering, in which state legislatures draw up congressional districts, is incredibly partisan. It includes drawn boundaries based on race, ethnicity, and political affiliation. With the purpose of maximizing a group or political parties votes or diluting the other group or parties vote. It is a practice where politicians pick their voters not the voters picking the politician. Political Gerrymandering done right can win you the majority of the House seats for a state without the popular vote. The process works best when you pack a small number of the districts with almost

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Partisan Gerrymandering is the process legislators go to though, by either drawing or changing district boundaries, to make sure one political party has an advantage when it comes to the outcome of an election. This takes away the whole point of being a democratic country where people have the freedom to choose their own government, and representation. Because elections are rigged and peoples votes don't count, legislators makeup district boundaries that only benefit them, and most importantly keep a party chosen by them and only them in a secure route to WIN, without caring about what the voters actually want. Making partisan gerrymandering a big threat to democracy because instead of having the people choose, politicians are choosing for them. Since legislators draw the district…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Week article “How to rig elections, the legal way”, The week staff describes how parties gain an advantage by redrawing voting districts. This process of redrawing voting districts to favor one’s political party is considered gerrymandering. It creates districts that are irregularly shaped and is a legal process unless it violates the 1965 voting rights act which makes it illegal to redistrict based off of minority voters. Gerrymandering has been successful in recent years because in 2012 gerrymandered states such as Pennsylvania won 49% of the vote and took 72% of house seats. Redistricting is overseen by whoever controls the state legislature and happens every ten years with data collected from the recent census.…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Every state in the U.S. are broken into congressional districts. The people of that certain district vote for a congressman to represent them in congress. Not all states have the same amount of districts, states are in different shapes and sizes, based on population that’s how many districts there are in that state. Mario Diaz-Balart effectively represents the needs, opinions and diversity of his constituents of the Florida 25th District. He’s a cuban-inherit, so he supports helping illegal immigrants.…

    • 1959 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The election of 1824 was a clear sign that sectionalism in politics was starting to become prominent. The nationalism hype of the War of 1812 was slowly decreasing and by the time of the elections there was a clear division between the different American Regions. It was as though the citizens of the northern, southern and western part of the United States considered themselves independent. The Election of 1824 was led by four candidates who ran under the Democratic Republican Party. John Quincy Adams from New England, William H. Crawford of Georgia, Henry Clay from Kentucky and General Andrew Jackson from Tennessee.…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Party polarization has a massive effect on voters, congress, and policymaking. Party polarization is the obvious division that exists between parties, specifically Democrats and Republicans, because of the extreme differences of the ideological beliefs of the opposing parties. Increasing party polarization causes many problems for the government. With party members determined to stand behind their own beliefs, it becomes difficult for the two parties to find common ground. The evident discord between Congress members then leads to polarization amongst voters and vice versa.…

    • 106 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Reporter Ronald Brownstein argues that there are four quadrants of Congress. Brownstein adheres to the idea that demographic factors that go beyond region play a powerful role in shaping each party’s representation in the House. The four quadrants of Congress, which include districts that have high levels of racial minorities and of educated whites, districts with high minority levels and low levels of white education, districts that have low minority levels and high white education levels, and districts with low minority levels and low white education, shape the impact of demography on parties in the House. The Democrats’ two greatest demographic strengths are the racial minorities and well-educated whites. While the Democrats drawing their…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the United States reapportionment and redistricting are both processes for deciding voting lines. Reapportionment is the process of reassessing the amount of congressional house seats for each state. Reapportionment is conducted through a census. This takes place every ten years, during which every person, citizen or not, is counted in each state. The process also decides the amount of votes each state gets for the electoral College.…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Prison Gerrymandering

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the case “Davidson v. City of Cranston” the City of Cranston, Rhode Island counted inmates as part of the total population when conceiting district lines, causing prison gerrymandering. The first district found that the City of Cranston had not violated the Equal Protection Clause. In a sense, prison gerrymandering legal under Evenwel v. Abbott. Prison Gerrymandering is “the practice of counting incarcerated people as residents of prisons when drawing electoral districts” (Davidson v. City). This case has many contradictions to the rule of law including multiple factors.…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a well functioning republic, voters elect officials whose ideals align with their own. To allow politicians with a vested interest in the way districts are drawn create congressional districts is inherently illogical, and, as the court cases in Wisconsin and our state have shown, politicians of both parties will act on this vested interest. Disproportionate representation is a result of gerrymandering when redistricting is placed in the hands of state legislatures, but it is not the only result. Packing districts also decreases political competition. The consequence of the lack of competition is increasing polarity in office.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If I were to choose to establish a twenty-eighth amendment, it would be the removal of the Electoral College. The founding fathers established the Electoral College as a compromise between election of the President by a vote in Congress and election of the President by a popular vote. Each state is given a specific number of electors based on the number of its United States representatives and senators. This allows for over-representation of small states and under-representation of large states, while the winner-takes-all format followed by most states could result in a candidate winning the popular vote but losing the election. This has occurred on various occasions.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First of all, “winner takes all” requires that all the Electoral College votes of a state go to winning candidate of the state’s popular vote. This is favorable for states in which there is a large part majority in one direction or the other: democratic or republican. The proportional, also known as Congressional District method, is another form of vote distribution that ensures the two Senate votes to winner of the statewide popular vote, but gives one vote to the candidate who wins each congressional district within the state. This method allows for a split vote as the districts may have opposing party majorities giving votes to both candidates. For example, if this was implemented into the state of Texas, the two Senate votes would most surely go to the Republican candidate, but there would be some allowed democratic electoral votes in the districts which have a democratic majority.…

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Electoral College Dilemma Premise: The U.S. Electoral College voting system needs to be improved upon because whoever earns the majority of total votes cast should be the winner. Definitions: Electoral College-…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, there is no legislation against redistricting. The most significant point the author made was the pressing issue of racial redistricting in Texas. Gerrymandering is the redistribution in which electoral district boundaries are drawn for electoral advantage. Gerrymandering is often used to hinder political parties, racial groups, or class groups.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many years ago our founding fathers made a government without tyranny, they were smart to do this because they didn't want to have all the power in the hands of one person or group. Delegates (55) gathered in Philadelphia at the Constitutional Convention to frame a government without too much power in the hands of one person or a group. The Constitution was signed September 17, 1787. How did these framers protect us from tyranny ? They wanted to create a government without tyranny and they did by creating federalism, separation of powers, checks and balances, and the small state big state compromise.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A law involving gerrymandering was passed in 1967 that banned multimember districts for fear of racism or an unfair advantage to one party (Yglesias). The argument for gerrymandering is that it balances the seats in Congress, half Republican and half Democrat, providing the minority more of a majority in congress. It also provides politicians the ability to safely guarantee the majority in the House does not change because of…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays