Gerrymandering Pros And Cons

Improved Essays
Gerrymandering is the process of altering electoral districts to favor a political party over the other by receiving more votes in that district based on the population demographics and party affiliation. The practice of gerrymandering was created when Governor Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts had enacted a bill that would allow the state to the redistricted in a way that would favor the party he represented, the Democratic-Republican Party, over the Federalists. When the redistricting plan was brought to the press, the term was created using Governor Gerry 's name and the term salamander after one district in Boston appeared to look like a salamander. In recent elections, the United States has not gone through a redistricting process since the last census in 2010. With the next census coming up in 2020, the United States will have to analyze areas where that population has either increased or decreased and redistribute the electoral districts accordingly. Unfortunately, this will result in some form of gerrymandering to sway voting populations for either Democrats or Republicans. After the 2016 elections, it seems as those redistricting had be in favor of the Republicans so they can reclaim areas that they …show more content…
After the 2016 election, it seems gerrymandering will never die off as the practice can be used as a ploy for one political party to overcome the other with an advantage. What I wonder for the future is if we will establish a system of independent or alternative parties on top of our two party system, how will districts look when every party wants a piece of the American electorate. How can all of these parties please a single group of people with differing viewpoints more complex than the political parties themselves? When will we eventually create a system of equal representation and gradually eliminate the use of

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Partisan Gerrymandering is the process legislators go to though, by either drawing or changing district boundaries, to make sure one political party has an advantage when it comes to the outcome of an election. This takes away the whole point of being a democratic country where people have the freedom to choose their own government, and representation. Because elections are rigged and peoples votes don't count, legislators makeup district boundaries that only benefit them, and most importantly keep a party chosen by them and only them in a secure route to WIN, without caring about what the voters actually want. Making partisan gerrymandering a big threat to democracy because instead of having the people choose, politicians are choosing for them. Since legislators draw the district…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I, Sect. I and II) that is on the topic of political rights, it does not provide any legislation that discusses redistricting, so until an amendment is passed that regulates the manner in which districts are drawn, this is an illogical…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The process of gerrymandering started in 1788, before Congress even existed. Henry drew the fifth congressional district in Virginia to include as many Anti-Federalists as possible. However, Henry didn’t have the resources to prevent Madison, his opponent, from beating him. Today, Henry would have been able to ensure victory because of detailed census results and voter tallies. Political parties use two specific techniques to gerrymander which are “packing” and “cracking” districts.…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Party polarization has a massive effect on voters, congress, and policymaking. Party polarization is the obvious division that exists between parties, specifically Democrats and Republicans, because of the extreme differences of the ideological beliefs of the opposing parties. Increasing party polarization causes many problems for the government. With party members determined to stand behind their own beliefs, it becomes difficult for the two parties to find common ground. The evident discord between Congress members then leads to polarization amongst voters and vice versa.…

    • 106 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Reporter Ronald Brownstein argues that there are four quadrants of Congress. Brownstein adheres to the idea that demographic factors that go beyond region play a powerful role in shaping each party’s representation in the House. The four quadrants of Congress, which include districts that have high levels of racial minorities and of educated whites, districts with high minority levels and low levels of white education, districts that have low minority levels and high white education levels, and districts with low minority levels and low white education, shape the impact of demography on parties in the House. The Democrats’ two greatest demographic strengths are the racial minorities and well-educated whites. While the Democrats drawing their…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This may occur to to the addition or loss of representative(s). Each district has to have equal population, must be connected, and must be compact. Politicians may gerrymander to keep an incumbent in power. They change district lines to ensure that the majority of voters in the district will support the incumbent.…

    • 219 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the United States reapportionment and redistricting are both processes for deciding voting lines. Reapportionment is the process of reassessing the amount of congressional house seats for each state. Reapportionment is conducted through a census. This takes place every ten years, during which every person, citizen or not, is counted in each state. The process also decides the amount of votes each state gets for the electoral College.…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One limit is that you should be able to draw the line of the district without having to pick up your pencil. It’s a continuous line. The second limit is that the amount of people in a district should be equal. Political parties play important roles in US elections and government institutions. Over the past several decades, the influence of political parties in elections has declined while their strength in Congress has increased.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What a shame that, in a country founded on and by democracy, such an undemocratic practice as gerrymandering is allowed to work almost unchecked in politics! How is it that America prides herself on giving an equal voice to each of her citizens, yet she allows politicians to create grotesque new voting districts in order to favor their party? Although the practice of gerrymandering has been used by politicians almost since the foundation of the country, it is rarely brought to the attention of most people. Gerrymandering is gradually destroying democracy in America by drowning the voices of the citizens and by removing the competitive energy and fairness from elections.…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Prison Gerrymandering

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the case “Davidson v. City of Cranston” the City of Cranston, Rhode Island counted inmates as part of the total population when conceiting district lines, causing prison gerrymandering. The first district found that the City of Cranston had not violated the Equal Protection Clause. In a sense, prison gerrymandering legal under Evenwel v. Abbott. Prison Gerrymandering is “the practice of counting incarcerated people as residents of prisons when drawing electoral districts” (Davidson v. City). This case has many contradictions to the rule of law including multiple factors.…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This was a phenomenon that came to the attention of Republicans in the 1990s, just in time for redistricting. Given that minority voters…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In addition, redistricting and gerrymandering are used to promote political parties such as the growing dominates Republican Party. The elections are now more based on unfair gerrymandering, interest group funding, and campaigning rather than the politician. Therefore, the voting right act, unfair campaigns, and gerrymandering can dilute minority voters and their voice in…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this sense, proponents argue that the process “somehow preserves federalism or small states ' legitimate interests” (Edwards 2005, p. 11). One concern of the democratic process is developing methods for maintaining equal representation across all states despite their size. Imbalances due to the weight given to states, the potential for the winner to lose the popular vote, and disproportionate advantages are all cited as major failures of the Electoral College in adhering to democratic principles. Proponents for direct elections cite these implications as a source of criticism of the current system. The national attention on those states that have the variability for political competition can cause an imbalance in issues that candidates consider (Grofman & Feld, 2009).…

    • 1854 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    It allows people to think that redistricting is more neutral than it is because people think of geography – as opposed to race, socioeconomic status, or political affiliation -- as a neutral factor, when in fact the geographical location of voters often intersects with various demographic…

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A law involving gerrymandering was passed in 1967 that banned multimember districts for fear of racism or an unfair advantage to one party (Yglesias). The argument for gerrymandering is that it balances the seats in Congress, half Republican and half Democrat, providing the minority more of a majority in congress. It also provides politicians the ability to safely guarantee the majority in the House does not change because of…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays