German Judicial System

Improved Essays
Germany with the help of the United States and their own constitution established the judicial system under the part titled The Judiciary and has twelve articles describing many different parts of the system. Their constitution has a lot more parts and explanations of how the government is set up in Germany. They go in more detail than American in how they are organized and what they can do. According to Alex Dragnich “Although Germany is a federal system, its state and national court system do not parallel and partially overlap each other, as is true in the United States” (428). They have the Supreme Federal Constitutional court which is over five other courts in the judicial system. The five courts are administrative, labor, tax, social, …show more content…
There are sixteen judges and eight from the Bundesrat and Bundestag. This can also be a lengthy process and many factors can play a part. They are elected for a twelve year term and must be at least 40 years old and must also retire at age 68. The German judges are a little different than American judges in their careers as Alex Dragnich reads “Thus, being a judge is a career that one chooses early in life, rather than coming to it at middle age after years of private law practice, as is the pattern in the United States” ( 427). In the two senates they are divided into three chambers with three members and one member from one of the senate is the president of the ruling and in the other senate is the vice president. The set up and divisions are a little more complicated than the straightforwardness of the United States …show more content…
Michael Curtis and others state that “The Basic Law authorizes both judges and legislative groups, as well as state government, to petition the court directly” (226). It has three types of jurisdiction being concrete, abstract, and constitutional complaints. The jurisdiction on abstract deals with questions when no actual case is present. The concept of concret jurisdiction deals with actual cases that raises questions and is similar to the United State Supreme Court and how it function. The constitutional complaints is similar to abstract hearings but has a wider range. The reason for this is because anyone in Germany can bring up cases that could infringe on the their rights in the Basic Law. This idea is different than the American system. It is the top of all the other courts but mainly deals with the constitution and the other five dealing within their specialty. The court has jurisdiction over 16 categories which the Basic Law talks about. This is a wider jurisdiction than the United State system. The appeals cases are heard in the Federal Court of Justice. The basic law make sure that the constitutional court deals only with issue with the Basic Law and not appeals. They can also review and be more involved in the legislative process than in

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    INTRODUCTION This essay examines the Australian court hierarchy, and the extension power the High Court attains as it has the ability too overturn decisions made by the Supreme Court. As it is the final court of appeal therefore reintegrates the point that the power of appointment is held within the body of the High Court. As the Australian Federal system consists of national court and a court system for each individual state and the two territories.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Level 1 is limited jurisdiction. This would consist of local, municipal, and Justice Courts. These courts tend to handle local matters and municipal violations. Municipal courts also handle a lot of misdemeanor violations of state law that took place within their jurisdiction. Justice Courts oversee a broad range of civil cases as well as hold preliminary hearings for many felony cases.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Judicial powers are stated in the Constitution and we labeled the Supreme Court, and those courts that are below the highest in the land, congress has the obligation to establish these courts. Distribution of power allows the Supreme Court to have the final say-so in cases involving: ambassadors, other public ministers and counsels. During any other cases the Supreme Court should have the power of court review and the ability to change the outcomes of the lower courts final deacons. Thus the question that will arise is that, if an act is untasteful in the Constitutions terms can the law become the law of the country, this should be an interesting topic for elected officials.…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Discuss the dual court system in the United States, and the structure of the federal court system, and your home state court system. The structure of the American court system has been viewed as complex and confusing as federal and state courts differ in jurisdiction, and types of cases that can be handled at the many different levels. The Supreme Court is the ultimate decision maker in cases that has been appealed regarding decisions made at the lower level of federal and state Supreme Courts. The dual court system operates within the boundaries of the state and federal court systems.…

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Georgia court system consists of a Municipal Court, Magistrate Court, Probate Court, Juvenile Court, State Court, Superior Court, Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court. The Municipal Court has three hundred and seventy courts with three hundred and fifty two active Judges. The Municipal Court handles traffic offenses, local ordinance violations, conduct preliminary hearings, issue warrants, and they may handle misdemeanor shoplifting and possession of marijuana cases. The Judges in the Municipal Court can be appointed by the mayor or elected.…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Article III allows Congress to set the jurisdiction of the Court and to create lower…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After the Revolutionary War, the thirteen colonies needed a government to replace the British system they overthrew. The Founding Fathers drafted the Articles of Confederation. The articles were briefly used until citizens began to see its shortcomings. It was just a “firm league of friendship. ”…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The U.S. Supreme Court is the highest federal court in America. The court consists of The Chief Justice of the U.S. with eight associate judges all nominated by the President of the U.S. They evaluate laws according to and try cases pertaining to the Constitution. The hierarchy under the U.S. Supreme Court is Appellate Courts, Trial Courts, and Federal Courts and boards outside of the Judicial Branch. The Supreme Court rules whether or not it is permitted under the Constitution.…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the United States, the court system judicial authority is shared between the levels of government. Today, the Texas Constitution lacks power in people, campaign contributions, lack of minority representation on the bench, perceptions of fairness, and lack of knowledge on the part of the voters. Due to lack of these powers, people distrust the changes that could give the government even more power. Thought the states in United States, the Texas judiciary is among the most complicated and confusing systems. Courts are expected by the country to act in nonpolitical ways, focus on the wishes of the electorate, focus on justice, and give the fair and right judgment for the citizens.…

    • 178 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Alabama Courts Essay

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The types of cases work completed by probate courts are cases related to mental illness, marriage licenses, distribution after a person's death, and adoption of a minor. Intermediate Appeals Courts includes the Court of Civil Appeals that has five judges that sit in panels consisting of three judges that sit and decide a case. This court has jurisdiction in appealed civil cases under $50,000. The Alabama courts of criminal appeals consist of five judges that sit en banc with all five judges sit and decide the case. The Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals handles hearing all appeals of felonies and misdemeanors crime cases in the state of Alabama.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Constitutional Convention was a very special event that shaped American history, it all started with one bright idea. After the Articles of Confederation, James Madison and others noticed that the central government created by the Articles of Confederation was weak and ineffective. So many famous political attended a convention to revise the Articles of Confederation. The convention was held at the State House of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania in May through September of 1787. They created a strong central government still used today!…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Adversary Process Trial

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It is the same as the previous two with the exception of the person deciding the outcome. Also, both questions of law and fact can be found in the trail. The second option is for the appeal to go to a court of appeals. This is an ordinary appellant court that mostly deals with written documents and sometimes oral arguments. Only questions of law may be determined in the trial.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Duel Court System

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Constitution or federal laws (under federal-question jurisdiction); • Cases between citizens of different states if the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000 (under diversity jurisdiction); and • Bankruptcy, copyright, patent, and maritime law cases.” In situations when federal and state courts both possess jurisdiction; the involved parties to choose state court or to federal court venue. Supreme Court and Jurisdiction…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Judicial Dbq Analysis

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Although a majority of documents convey the impression, to be against the Supreme Court having the power to question the constitutionality of federal laws; but the amount of documents that agree, have more solid evidence in their argument. The Supreme Court should have the power to overturn unconstitutional federal laws. Federalist No. 78, the Marbury v. Madison decision, Article III of the Constitution and the Judiciary Act of 1789 are prime examples to prove that the judicial branch has the authority to do so. First of all, in Federalist No. 78, written by Alexander Hamilton in 1788; declares that, “[The] courts were designed to be an intermediate body between the people and the legislature...”(Doc D).…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nicolas Winters Group #5 Paper 2 What powers do the Constitution give the Judicial Branch? A world without the Judicial Branch of government is a world without set rules. In 1787, the Constitution had created the Judicial Branch, under Article 2 Section 2, to deal with all of the new laws that could be set in place. The Judicial Branch also leads the Supreme Court, the highest court of law in the United States. The Judicial Branch of government receives powers backed up by the U.S. Constitution, has a very strict and complex system to become a supreme court judge, and the U.S. Supreme Court Justices should interpret the Constitution by how it was originally wrote.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays