George Zimmerman Case Summary

In consequence, the moral guilt of the defendant (George Zimmerman) is hard to ascertain because these emotional level are instilled, learned and facilitate continuance of hate, loathing, despising of a race in its entirety. Further the juror’s perception of the case which resolves around the defendant and the slain (Trayvon Martin – a slim built youth not capable of protecting himself long against someone heavier and stronger) altercation initiated by George who removed himself out of his car and took upon himself to attack Trayvon who has the natural right to try to defend self but was overpowered and shot. The question then comes to how far away was the shot, was there time to shoot in the air and apprehend safely, did he have the right to approach the “so-called” suspect when he was off-duty doing personal errands and what was the acts of suspicion that caused him to remand and gauge deadly force was needed and the slain was unarmed? …show more content…
Further, in the case of the juror understanding of the legal issue regarding the case crying self-defense does not constitute right when he did not identify self and followed no set protocol but his own marching drum.

His job is to secure the security door and ensue no entry and call in any disruptions not attack someone outside the complex (Twin Lakes Housing Community) by being a bad caricature of