Hamilton's Farewell Address Analysis

Improved Essays
In George Washington’s Farewell Address, he warned that independence, peace at home and abroad, safety, prosperity, and liberty were all dependent upon the unity between the states. He discouraged the nation from separating into factions, ““The alternate domination of one faction over another, sharpened by the spirit of revenge, natural to party dissension, which in different ages and countries has perpetrated the most horrid enormities, is itself a frightful despotism.” Having Washington 's warning in mind, it’s ironic that his personally appointed Secretary of Treasury, Alexander Hamilton, and Secretary of State, Thomas Jefferson, formed the basis of political parties. Both helped guide the United States in interpreting the Constitution …show more content…
These ideas formed the Federalist Party, originating in the early 1790s. Hamilton 's views for America were ambitious and power-hungry, and from his fears and hopes, for his country, the Federalist Party was born. One fear of Hamilton 's was the people. He believed that the masses were “turbulent and changing.” (MP 163) In saying this, he is implying that he doesn’t trust the people and instead power should be entrusted to the wealthy elite, not only because they were more educated but above all because they were the ones most able to handle national debt. To explain, America had foreign debt as well as national debt to pay off. Hamilton’s play to pay off this debt was to establish credit by selling bonds from the Bank of the United States and collecting the money earned to pay back previous debt. By trusting the wealthy with the nation 's debt, Hamilton felt it would keep the government from collapsing because the wealthy would keep putting money into the bank as long as they weren’t losing any. To furthermore entrust America 's fate in the wealthy, Hamilton was a supporter of the Excise Whiskey Tax, the first tax imposed on domestic products, that directly targeted small farmers, who grew the grain that made whiskey. He supported this tax because he had a fear of the nonwealthy gaining too much power and believed this tax would prevent that. Another fear Hamilton had been …show more content…
Jefferson’s idea of an ideal society was revolved around the common man. (MP 165) He praised the “yeoman farmer” and trusted in their discretion about what America could become. “He felt that urbanization, industrial factories, and financial speculation would serve to rob the common man of his independence and economic freedom.” (MP165) Jefferson feared the opposite of what Hamilton did, he feared the national government gaining power. Jefferson identified more with state independence because he lived in the states while they were still separate, whereas Hamilton didn’t have any regard for local autonomy because he never lived in an individual state and had to fight for states rights. Jefferson feared a strong centralized power because he believed the more power to the common man, the better. Thomas Jefferson shares how much trust he had in the common man in his Notes on the State of Virginia, “Those who labor in the earth are the chosen people of God.” (MP 165) This quote clearly expresses the amount of trust Jefferson had in the people and furthermore, how idealistic he was about having a government for the people by the people. Jefferson also feared strong economy and industry, means he didn’t think leading America down a commercial path was the right answer. He believed commercialism would bring a love of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Shortly after the ratification of the Constitution, George Washington unanimously won the presidential election of 1789. Striving towards a nation of unity, Washington set up a cabinet of four strong individuals in order to inaugurate a system of both balance and credibility. Although Washington was strongly against political parties, it wasn’t long until they began to emerge. Filling the cabinet with tension, Alexander Hamilton, Secretary of Treasury, and Thomas Jefferson, Secretary of State, brought upon new challenges for American politics in the eighteenth century, when they brought two very incompatible visions of what they hoped America’s future would look like to the plate. Additionally, their political and economic differences greatly…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For all intents and purposes, Hamilton and Jefferson established the political party system that we see today, and the inherent challenges that are incurred. For example when Rep. Mitch McConnell challenged Obama over the Presidential right to replace Scalia, his challenge reflected the role of the states versus the central government as McConnell argued that the people of the country should have the right to decide the next Chief Justice even though this is the prerogative of the US President. Any kind of bi-partisanship in politics is the legacy of Hamilton…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson had fundamentally different opinions on how the United States should be constructed and governed. Hamilton believed the elite should hold great power and that the federal government should be exceptionally strong. However, Jefferson believed that the common man should rule the country and that the state governments should hold most of the powers. Both men had a strong impact on America today, yet one more than the other.…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hamiltonians In The 1790s

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The people of the Early Republic of the 1790s had very distinct, opposing views of one another on how the government should operate under a new constitution. These disputes stemmed from the adoption of beliefs from Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson, who originally were highly opposed to factions. Their ideas were vastly accepted by two different groups: the Hamiltonians and the Jeffersonians. The many issues they disagreed on were nearly opposite one another, and ultimately lead to the creation of the first party system consisting of the Federalists and Republicans. Initially, these two men were very much against factions.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On the other hand, Hamiltonians believe the elite were better qualified and should assume responsibility of decision making for the overall benefit of society. We see this political belief in action when federalists began to respond to relations with France in 1797. Due to the French Revolution France had bad temperament towards anyone showing camaraderie with…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In American history, few ideological disagreements have been as important as the divide between Alexander Hamilton 's Federalist Party and Thomas Jefferson 's Democrat-Republicans. Both parties were led by brilliant men whose political arguments would lay the foundation for debates on the nature of government in America that are ever present in our national discourse. Hamilton thought America should drive ahead into the future as an industrial and mercantile powerhouse, whereas Thomas Jefferson felt that America 's greatness lied in the "yeoman farmer" and the agrarian traditions he represented. Both sought the best path forward for the young American nation and both would have a chance to put their theories to the test in their capacities as ministers in the Washington Administration…

    • 1504 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The election of 1800 was the first time the federal government had submitted its power and truly gave into democracy and more importantly laid the framework of how an election should be ran. In his address Jefferson’s passion for differing viewpoints is shown when he said “...every difference of opinion is not a difference of principle. We have called by different names brethren of the same principle. We are all Republicans, we are all Federalists . If there be any among us who would wish to dissolve this Union or to change its republican form, let them stand undisturbed as monuments of the safety with which error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it".…

    • 1033 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Author Mark Twain stated, “Loyalty to the Nation all the time, loyalty to government when it deserves it”. In his farewell address, George Washington expressed the importance of putting America above any local or foreign identity. We disagree with Washington's absolute take on patriotism as this may create a populous which blindly adopts the decree of an unjust government. A big concern during the time of Washington’s farewell address was the fear of Americans identifying more closely with their states than with the national government.…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Politically, Hamilton hoped for a revival of monarchist type leadership, as he saw the Articles of Confederation as being weak, and that the new nation needed strong leadership (Sheuerman, “American Kingship?”, 29). So in some ways we have Hamilton to thank for the way the office of the President is today; as Hamilton thought the office of President should a very prestigious, powerful, and lifelong occupation. Despite his influence on American political philosophy, Hamilton’s lasting legacy is as an economist, and his influence on American economics is still very much prevalent today; especially the legacy of Hamilton’s famous document “Report on Manufactures”, which he wrote in 1791. Many of his tariff recommendations were adopted by Congress in 1792, and have remained influential economic…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hamilton was concerned about the role of people who would shape public policy, he distrusted common man. Hamilton also pushed for industrial…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    George Washington’s Farewell Address to the People of the United States was, in essence, Washington’s last-ditch effort to keep America going on the right path before he left office. Washington could see the growing tensions spreading across America, and he knew that factors like split political parties and foreign intervention would only cause the still very young America great stress. When Washington finally made the decision to retire from office, he left behind a series of growing issues that the next president, John Adams, dealt with; however, the original plan Washington had was to retire after only one term, so the first draft of his Farwell Address, co-written with James Madison , didn’t include many of the issues Washington brought up in his publicized speech. When he turned to Alexander Hamilton to edit what Madison had originally written, Hamilton expanded on issues like “foreign affairs, and updated it to reflect the Washington Administration’s revised neutrality policy .” The final draft, published on September 19, 1796, went through several stages of revision and was edited by Thomas Jefferson and Timothy Pickering , among others, and it mainly focused on the importance of a unified government, the dangers of a two-party system, and the negative influence of getting involved in foreign affairs.…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He favored a strong federal government made of many wealthy members. Moreover, Hamilton held a loose interpretation of the Constitution. He even supported sometimes restrictions on speech and press under certain circumstances. Hamilton even challenged the foundation of the government saying that the Articles of Confederation were radical, members of the…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Michael Vipond Mr. Haindfield APUSH 1 November 2017 Unit 6 Reaction Paper In the 1780s and 1790s, Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton had vastly different ideas on how the economic future would be for the United States. Both of them envisioned a prominent nation, but with both different ideas on how to get there. Despite Jefferson’s view of a future of agricultural economy, which was based on farming, no national bank, and strong state governments; Hamiltons view of an industrial economy, which was based on manufacturing, a national bank, and a strong national government, prospered. The extent in which each of their visions affected the United States were reflected by strikes done in the labor work force, the repeal of the national bank by Andrew Jackson, and the growing number of textiles in the U.S. between 1810 and 1840.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While hamilton knew human nature and was confident enough that Jefferson’s interpretation would eventually backfire. For someone so well educated jefferson lack the common sense and rationality to know that humans for centuries has find loopholes in perceived perfect system to use it to their own advantage. Hamilton who observant and aware of human nature suggest a way to work around…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is conflict necessary for change? Based on Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson I draw the conclusion that yes, conflict is necessary for change. I believe that change is only completed if there is a conflict, no matter how big or how small it is. My three reasons for this, are based on Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson arguments on their views of human nature, the best form of government, and Ideal Economy. In documents provided for us, document 1, 2 Hamilton and Jefferson disagreed in the way they viewed human nature.…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays