Gorge, Orwell writes about an elephant in his essay “Shooting an Elephant” where the main craters is a police man for the British emperor in one of the eastern countries. This police man has an internal power struggle with his duty and internal feelings of what he knows as right. In this country he imply about how the people there are cage and are oppressed by the British Emperor he is also concern with his duty and how the people view him. Even though the policeman is authority figure he takes on the role of the tyrant.…
He later continues on: “There were several thousands of them [young Buddhist priests] in the town and none of them seemed to have anything to do except stand on street corners and jeer at Europeans” (851). The way Orwell describes the natives’ actions, using negatively packed words such as “sneering” and “jeer”, displays the character’s sour viewpoint of the locals and that he nearly despises his time in Burma and the foreign culture he does not understand well. This casts the native agitators in a hostile, negative light that makes the character feel unwelcome. Throughout the first half of the essay leading up to the hunt for the elephant, the character also develops his equally acidic stance on his country and its invasive, ignorant action. Describing the country’s and his present situation, he says “The wretched prisoners huddling in the stinking cages of the lock-ups, the grey, cowed faces of the long-term convicts…
His humiliation and sense of defeatare conveyed through his compelling words. He shows the audience that through this incident, hereceives a “better glimpse than [he] had had before of the real nature of imperialism — the realmotives for which despotic governments act” (Orwell).The whole essay, with its appeals of ethosand pathos, uses of imagery, and satirical techniques, boils down to the irony between theoutward and inward appearances of a British authority figure in Burma, or any other state withinthe British sphere of influence. This irony shows how imperialism ruins everyone involved— starting from the inner core. Orwell, George. "Shooting an Elephant.…
In Shooting an Elephant it is interesting to see the juxtaposition that is used during the story. Initially in the story it starts out by saying how great Imperialism is, and the benefits to how society is structured in Burma. In the next paragraph Orwell states how he hates imperialism and that he can not wait for the opportunity when he can leave Burma and not have to represent the imperialistic society. There is a sharp contrast between these two ideas. I would not want to live in a society that is run like this, but for Burma it seems to be a good fit.…
Secretly Orwell was all for the Burmese people but him being on the opposite side because of his job made people look at him different, they hated him because he stood with a whole army of police officers who believed in imperialism. Orwell strikes an emotion of sympathy and exhibits a relatable feeling that most can feel. A sour bitter feeling toward the ones we hate using himself as an example, he shows a trait of hatred for himself throughout the…
George Orwell was an English author who is a well known figure today in literature. According to Matthew Price, Orwell is continuously resurrected by his many supporters and is hard to keep in the grave (Price, 2003). Two of Orwell’s earliest writings include “A Hanging” and “Shooting an Elephant.” Orwell’s “A Hanging” and “Shooting an Elephant” both have similarities and differences that can be examined by further analyzing each text.…
(Orwell 1432). Orwell uses his descriptions and diction to make his audience feel uncomfortable and sympathetic to his arguments that imperialism is detrimental and dying in India in the 1920s. Had he simply stated that the elephant died, there would be no parallel to the crumbling of the empire and imperialism. Additionally, confesses that he only killed the elephant “to avoid looking like a fool” (1432). Orwell shows that although he appears to have an important role in Burma, he is just a puppet of imperialism.…
Ideologies and structures that manifest in society are ceaselessly reinforced, causing an unfathomable chasm of disparity between individuals. Within the essays of “Shooting an Elephant”, “Learning to Read and Write” and “Just Walk on By”, in some sort of way they demonstrate how difficult for one to counteract misconceptions and stereotypes when such negative connotations are deeply ingrained in society; ultimately one is more susceptible to fall into becoming the stereotype. The essay “Shooting an Elephant” written by George Orwell is a personal account of his struggle for self-identity, especially as a colonial officer. The job he chose did not reflect his true intentions, the irony as he writes, “All I knew was that I was stuck between…
When Orwell got there he was attacked by others telling him to kill the elephant who killed this man. He knew he could not do that. Orwell said, “As soon as I saw the elephant I knew with perfect certainty that I ought to shoot him. It is a serious matter to shooting an elephant” (Orwell, 724). Orwell looked at the situation as murder if he killed the elephant and if possible wanted to avoid it.…
Adrianna Geisler ENGL1010 Essay #1 8 Sept. 2015 Reading Response Essay for “Shooting an Elephant” In the essay “Shooting an Elephant” by George Orwell, the author is trying to show how imperialism can have strong effects on someone. In addition, Orwell describes his personal decision to shoot an elephant after the animal kills a man.…
Think Twice Before You Shoot In “Shooting an Elephant,” from The Norton Reader, George Orwell explains his personal experience in an imperialistic county where he feels as though he is forced to shoot an elephant that had escaped into a town killing a man. His thoughts were not set on killing the wild animal but under circumstances, Orwell felt as though he would be seen as a fool to the natives if he did not live up to the expectation of the natives to kill the elephant. Once Orwell shot the elephant he had to watch as it lay slowly dying, seemingly not wanting to die the elephant remained to hold on to the life he had left. Orwell ends up killing the elephant once and for all after many brutal attempts, and then he sits analyzing weather…
He is not able to speak for himself and dose what is expected of him. He displays himself as the victim of Burmese. Orwell was annoyed by the humility he was getting from the native. They made him feel pressured and over whealmed. Orwell was conflicted through the story, he did not know if he should do what he believed was the right thing or if he should go against his morals and be accepted.…
In the story of the elephant Mr. Orwell paints a picture of another type of inner conflict that he experienced while working in Burma. That is, when one knows deep inside what they should rightly do, but due to outside pressures and influences they choose another course of action. The anecdote is about an elephant that is out of control and is ravaging a village. George Orwell is called out to neutralize the situation, but he does not know what he can do to help things. When he arrived at the scene he was told the elephant got away to paddy fields a thousand yards away.…
Being a person of high authorities can sometimes form a burden on you. This correlates to, “Shooting an Elephant,” by George Orwell, which is about a police officer in Burma. The police officer is a European, so he faces plenty of hatred in Burma. However, one day an elephant goes into “must” state and it is up to this police officer to stop the elephant. The police officer is not justified in his actions as he shoots the elephant to maintain his pride, the elephant is already in peace and there is plenty of social pressure.…
In the essay “Shooting an Elephant”, it is based on a man who is pressured to kill an elephant that was thought to be wild. This adventure took place in Moulmein, in Lower Burma. Could he have saved this elephant and done what his heart wanted to do? Or was the peer pressure by others to strong? Orwell withheld the…