George Kennan's Communist Ideology

Improved Essays
George Kennan was particularly critical of the Soviet's Communist ideology and also the way in which the Soviet leaders ran their country. He begins his argument by criticising the fanatical views of the Soviet leaders, as their fantasy of grandeur and power resulted in them being far too jealous to imagine there being a greater international power in the world sphere than themselves. All competing power was to be eradicated, and past the border of the Soviet Union, all other nations were hostile and unfriendly.
Kennan continues his arguments, stating that when the Russians require something of importance from other competing powers they will push other contentious issues to the background in order to attempt to mislead other nations. Kennan states that the United States in particular would be wise to not listen or take heed of the tactical manoeuvres the Soviets are deploying in order to manipulate and influence.
…show more content…
He stresses that they view themselves as always being right, and that their truth is the only correct way of viewing the world around them. The Kremlin is under no pressure to increase the speed of its domination across the-world stage, they are under no particular rush and can afford to take their time. To the Kremlin, it does not matter how slowly their movement progresses in its domination, but only that the Communist ideology has reached all of the furthermost corners of the world and has encompassed and filled all possible holes available to it in terms of world power. Kennan hypothesises that this means Soviet diplomacy is although more likely to yield on particular individual events, a singular victory of the opposition would have very little impact on its overall strength in the international

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    A walk through West Berlin: Containment of Communism After WWII , The United States made great efforts to contain communism from spreading around the world. Containment was the idea that the Soviet Union and Soviet communism should not be allowed to spread. A short passage, from a telegram that was secretly sent to U.S. State Department officials on February 22, 1946 from an American foreign service officer in Moscow makes it clear that Joseph Stalin and the Soviets believe communism is better than capitalism.…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cold War Dbq

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Traditionalist’s believed that the soviets were imposing communist governments on the unwilling nations of Eastern Europe, and schemed to spread communism throughout the world. American policy was the logical and necessary response. Thomas A. Bailey (1950), said that the “breakdown of relations was a direct result of aggressive Soviet policies of expansion in the immediate post-war years.” However the American involvement in Vietnam changed many historians’ views and the first revisionist interpretations began to appear.…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He develops his arguments by relating to thinking about how people think and idea-based explanations of why things work or happen the way they do and the opinions of different history experts. However, he seems to have be bias by presenting the United States as the innocent party while the Soviet Union is the Evil Empire. Despite these faults, the argument is forceful well researched and supported by excellent governmental information that was received storehouses of old…

    • 1061 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Cold War Dbq

    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The end of the Cold War remains a fervently debated topic in political science. Disagreements in this study of the Cold War largely stem from questioning what factors contributed, an in to degree, to ending the Cold War. To answer these questions, it proves necessary to examine just what exactly was the Cold War, along with when did it end, as we attempt to better understand its conclusion. During this analysis, we discover one of the main disagreements over what factors led to the end of the Cold War, which proceeds from two theories of international relations: realism and constructivism. Were material factors, such economic stagnation and declining political power in the Soviet Union, the main cause of the Soviet government ending its interventionist…

    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    George Kennan’s Containment Doctrine Revisited By Aizaz Khan I would like to review George Kennan’s Containment Doctrine through the lens of a splendid article written by Chalmer M. Roberts, “How Containment Worked”, which first appeared in the 1972’s summer edition of the Foreign Policy journal. Roberts, was the chief diplomatic correspondent for The Washington Post who covered the Cold War, the nuclear arms race and the seats of power in Washington in the 1950's and 60's, The article gives a unique perspective of George Kennan’s contribution towards formulation of US foreign policy, during the post cold-war era and deals with the concept of containment and how Kennan’s famous “X article” in Foreign Affairs helped to rally support for Truman’s…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    "The Successes and Failures of Containment during the Cold War" With the end of World War II, the growing power and influence of the Soviet Union became worrisome to the West. For the next few decades, the majority of American foreign policy would revolve around the Soviet Union, an era that came to be known as the Cold War. In his Long Telegram, George Kennan outlined the policy for this period, containment. In essence, Communism would be allowed to stay where it is but not allowed to expand. The United States policy of containment was only somewhat successful as seen in the results of the Korean War and the rebuilding of Europe and Japan, but had key failures such as the growth of Communism in Eastern Europe and Asia.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Communism In The 1950's

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The 1950s in the United States was a time of change, a time of fear, and a time of a “boom.” The 1950s was a time post World War II, where America’s wealth grew along with the economy. The “boom” was a boom in wealth and anxiety for Americans. The fifties were a time for growing technology including the use of television as a major news outlet, growing family sizes, growth in advancements such as highways, shopping malls, and corporations. The social norm was that the man belonged in the work force and women belonged at home with the family.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Legvold Summary

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Both Dmitri Trenin and Robert Legvold offer intriguing perspectives into the relationship that the U.S shares with Russia. This weeks reading of Return to the Cold war takes a decidedly more disparaging look at the state of affairs between Russia and the United States. In his book Legvold asserts that tensions between the U.S and the breakdown of relations, that culminated through the crisis in Ukraine has led to a “new cold war” between the two countries. Legvold notes that there are five key components that are still very much at play regarding relations between the two counties.…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kennan regards the Soviet Union as still rooted in Marxist ideology, but to strengthen the power and status. Consequently, international relations between the Soviet Union and other states have become hostile and fraught with secretiveness about internal policies and other weaknesses, to keep states such as the US wary of their power. Thus Kennan deduces that polarity between American and Soviet ideologies means that co-operation between the two superpowers would be unlikely for some time. The infallibility of the Kremlin, and the nature of the oppressive rule led to insecurity and a need to strengthen power through the exploitation of the population, manipulation of truths, installation of fear and propaganda.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    However, just because Stalin and Truman had vastly different political ideologies doesn’t mean the Cold War was inevitable. A large part of why the Cold war escalated to the height it did was because of a general lack of cooperation and understanding and an unwillingness to discuss territorial dispute from both the Soviets and Americans. Ironically, despite having deep feelings of hatred towards each other’s country Stalin and Truman met in person only one time (Patterson 108). Truman believed he could deal with Stalin, but the actions he took proved otherwise (109). The fact that Stalin and Truman only met once shows that the two countries were equally guilty of not wanting to deal with the problem at hand.…

    • 1801 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It can be seen that the United States involvement in the cold war was undoubtedly in order to prevent Russia from taking over Eurasia and therefore becoming more powerful and a greater threat. This can be related to the way in which America views China as an uprising threat as a result of their visible economic power and great a great potential threat to American…

    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The explanation of the fall of the Soviet Union would be to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of Gorbachev and other central decisions that were made in the state such as the strengths and weaknesses of socialism, and national sentiments of the Soviet Union, but to understand the events in world politics we must understand the theories as weak as they may be. It gives us implications to help us understand the wide variations of interactions that occur among states, and how fast nations and how much other nations are able to undergo change from past earlier eras. Wohlforth says that a casual analysis is important to realism in order to save it. Critics of realism understand the weaknesses of realism,…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1848, Karl Marx and Fredrick Engels published ‘The Communist Manifesto’ that was aimed at presenting the arguments, goals, and platform of Communism. The publication was a commissioned work that was intended to articulate the objective and platform of the Communist League, an international political party founded in 1847 in London, England. The authors point out the benefits of communism and the need for its application in the future. Besides, the manifesto was a proposal reading stabilization of the class structure in the society without conflict. The authors argue that historical developments have been impacted by the class struggles, with the rich battling with the poor and the exploitation of one class by another.…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kennan stated that the Soviet Union would try and expand their sphere of influence and that they would only discontinue any expansionist idea’s if ‘strong resistance is encountered at any point’. Kennan’s telegram is an important factor in causing a divide in Europe as it was this, that caused the Truman administration to rely more on their economic and military strength rather than diplomacy. In February 1947, the British Embassy informed the U.S that they would no longer provide financial aid to Greece and Turkey. Both countries needed assistance and were at risk of falling under Soviet control, particularly Greece, who was in the middle of a civil war (Frazier 1984) Dean Acheson the Undersecretary of State presented members of congress with a theory known as ‘the domino theory’ that if one nation…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Realism And The Cold War

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This however is idealistic. The fact that the U.S and USSR where never in direct conflict was because both states realised that any form of nuclear war would not go in either’s favour. National interest and the security of their people was enough to motivate peace; even if it was a fragile peace. However, the fact still remains that if either the US or the USSR believed that they could have become the hegemon without severe losses to national interests there would have been a war, institutions and diplomacy did not prevent conflict. And as rightly argued by Waltz ‘a state cannot be sure that today’s friends will not be tomorrow’s enemy’…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays