George Bush Violation Of Rights

Improved Essays
George W. Bush was the 43rd president of the United States who took an oath to “preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution”, but some may say that he failed to do so. Eight months into Bush’s first term as president, the September, 11th, 2001 terrorist attacks occurred - leading to Bush’s “war on terrorism”. This led to the cruel interrogations of terrorists, the removal of rights to trials and court reviewed cases, and the unreasonable and illegal surveillance of American citizens. These three events made by George Bush and his administration may prove that the president went against his oath and did not follow the constitution. The president’s policies on detainees during the “war on terror” can qualify as unconstitutional offenses. The Bush administration said that the “war on terror” exempted it …show more content…
The administration made the category of “enemy combatants” in order to deprive detainees of the legal protections of either the U.S. courts or “prisoner-of-war” status. They tried to detain these enemy combatants, some of them American citizens, indefinitely without trial, and without the right to have courts review their cases. Bush announced that these terrorists were not protected by the Geneva Conventions, which prohibits cruel treatment and torture, and claimed that the torture provided important information for the safety of Americans. The safety of Americans was not however protected when their fourth amendment right to be secure against unreasonable government searches and seizures. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) requires that warrants for national security wiretaps be

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    One major constitutional relationship that is defined deeply within the author’s argument is the distinct power of U.S foreign policy and whether or not the president or congress should have the ability to declare war (48). Ultimately when the framers constructed the constitution, it named the president the “ commander-in-chief”, however the power to declare war was only available to congress (50). Eventually this struggle among the branches led to the future outcry of who should deal with U.S foreign policy. Also over time presidents began to exert their “ commander-in-chief” duties by sending troops to where they felt necessary and even began wars only to justify that they did so with nation’s interest in mind, all without congressional approval…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hamdi Vs Rumsfeld Summary

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hamdi v. Rumsfeld (2004) -Should the government be able to indefinitely hold a U.S. citizen accused of being an "illegal enemy combatant" and deny them their due process rights? The Situation (Adam) State the facts of the case. What happened? -…

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The attack on 9/11 was organized by a Saudi fugitive Osama bin Laden, “for the retaliation of America 's support of Israel, it’s involvement in the Persian Gulf War, and its continued military presence in the Middle East (11).” That is why he planned to attack the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, to threaten our military and economic power and try to diminish America 's foundation. President Bush reacted to this terrorist attack with the issuing of the Patriot Act; allowing officials to hack into information and intercept into terrorist plans and attacks. President Bush’s solution was a long lasting, beneficial plan. The government had more advanced tools to be more aware of…

    • 1120 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the United States, people are given many liberties, rights, and freedoms. Since the country’s founding, it’s been a democratic government; valuing the voices and rights of its citizens. However, during times of national crisis, United States presidents have made controversial decisions affecting civil liberties. Many of these decisions, such as Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s order to relocate Japanese Americans, and George W. Bush’s signing of the USA Patriot, are still heavily debated over today. Different historians and ordinary citizens argue for or against the aforementioned orders.…

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Patriot Act The department of Justice (DOJ) has many different jobs to fulfill in regards to keeping our nation safe. But, the DOJ has one main priority, and that is to prevent future terrorist acts within the United States (US) , and when warranted outside of the US. In a post-9/11 world, meaning after the attacks on the US on September 11th, 2001, the Patriot Act, has played a key role in assisting the DOJ in preventing future acts of terrorism. The writer will examine the pros and cons of the Patriot Act, and overall the ethics behind establishing, and implementing the Patriot Act throughout this country.…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    9/11/01 will forever be remembered as one of the saddest, terrifying days in American history. This date will forever be imprinted on the minds of Americans who lost their loved ones, saw their city turn to chaos and their country in high distress and despair. The terrorist organization “al Qaeda” was responsible for this terror attacks hitting the world trade center and the pentagon, a couple of our most prized monuments. However, this could not bring the greatest land in the world to it’s feet, America is fiercer than that. In George Bush’s speech, addressed just 12 hours after the attack he lit a fire in the belly of Americans, he encourages strength and bravery in the people of the freedom land.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Invasion Of Iraq Dbq

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In this case, was notably stated in Document 5,from the Christian Science Monitor,"Yet the white house appears to be encouraging this false impression, as it seeks to maintain American support for a possible war against Iraq." Under those circumstances,the people of America must decide wether or not,to once again ,confide in its government but,this continues to create friction between the down front of the operations. Since as far back as the battle of Tonkin, the government has proven to take any means necessary to shift the public opinion accordingly,to their desire ,a repetition that seems to be taken place now. Not to mention,how in article 8,a demonstration of what is taking place is due to our response on the 9/11 incident ,namely criticised,"The way the Bush administration has trampled on the international rule of law and Genea conventions,Social Science Docket 23 Summer-Fall 2001 while abrogation civil liberties and expanding executive power at home has done huge damage no only to America's reputation but,more broadly,to the attractive power of Western vakues values. "In reality,the government's strategic ideal backfired leaving more families to deal with a longing for world peace and to throw their compensation money into the disposal unit then owing to profound grief as well.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It violates our right to search and seizure without proper warrants or probable cause. It is unconstitutional, and violates our civil liberties. Before the events that occurred on September eleventh two thousand and one, it is said that the United States government had enough tools and necessities to prevent it and fight…

    • 1465 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Our enemies have made the mistake that America’s enemies always make. They saw liberty and thought they saw weakness. And now, they see defeat.” George W. Bush stated this about the cowardly September 11th attacks. During that fateful day I was glued to my poorly constructed high school chair, gazing in disbelief what was unfolding on Mr. Cox’s History class television.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    After 9/11 occurred, the Bush Administration designed a law called the “Patriot Act.” The purpose of the Patriot Act is to surveil cellphones, tablets and anything that has a connection to the internet without you knowing. It is unconstitutional…

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Military Power Model

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages

    After 9/11, Bush's Justice Dept. reviewed a long update with the title: "Power for Use of Military Force to Combat Terrorist Activities Within the US. " The entire idea essentially shreds our Bill of Rights. [ to put it plainly, "established tenets managing law requirement movement are not pertinent. " The military could even "assault regular citizen targets where suspected terrorists were thought to be." And later, "First Amendment discourse and press rights might likewise be subordinated to the overriding need to take up arms effectively.…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bill Of Rights Violations

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. Bill of rights Violation. The U.S. Bill of Rights is the collective name for the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution. And by the provisions of the “due process” and “equal protection” provisions of the 14th amendment to the U.S. Constitution, these prohibitions apply to states and local governments as well.…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The forty-five square miles stretch of earth and sea at the southeastern tip of Cuba—Guantanamo Bay—has served a controversial role in history. Guantanamo Bay primarily served as a strategic logistics base for the U.S. Navy’s Atlantic Fleet to support Caribbean counter-drug operations and process undocumented aliens for US refugee repatriation/status to their host country but since 2002, it has also served to detain and interrogate international terrorist suspects (Schwab). (Previous Thesis) The United States’ decision to maintain a prison camp in Guantanamo Bay was mainly justified by the ___threat?? along with the ??? ?…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    U.S. War on Terror Policies: Security vs. Human Rights On September 10th, 2001, thousands of Americans went to sleep in their homes, unaware that it would be their last night alive. The next day, September 11th, over 3,000 Americans lost their lives as a result of the terroristic attacks led by the Islamic extremist group, al-Qaeda. The fact that United States security had been infiltrated came as a shock to the U.S. government and U.S. citizens. President George W. Bush and members of his administration decided it was time to reconsider government policies and organize a rally in national security efforts.…

    • 1463 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    National Security Analysis

    • 1888 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Under what circumstances should national security hold greater importance than human rights? In order to mitigate the direct threat of terrorist acts, what policies should democratic nations enact? Both civil society and political leaders seek to answer these philosophical questions – especially during times of war – in an effort to reach moral clarity. Issues surrounding torture are controversial and extremely emotional, therefore most individuals may avoid taking a position. American-born film director, Alex Gibney, utilizes his skill in the visual arts as a tool to engage auditors.…

    • 1888 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays