Difference Between Monism And Dualism

Superior Essays
The mind-body problem is primarily a question of how the mind and the body interact with and exist in harmony with one other. The fundamental issue related to the mind-body problem is that there is a significant divide between two groups: the monists and the dualists. At the core of monist thinking is the belief that only one supreme being exists. This belief is split up into two forms: physicalism, the doctrine that everything is physical matter; and idealism, the belief that everything that is thought to be physical is only an illusion. One philosopher, in particular, who held a strong conviction towards supporting monist and idealist thinking was George Berkeley. Contrary to the likes of dualism, Berkeley argued that the only way a physical …show more content…
At the core of the soul’s existence is its ability to express emotion. This idea is essentially what gives each human being a sense of character capable of displaying personal emotions and detecting those same emotions in others. However, one of the ways in which an individual expresses emotion is by showing it on their face, which is part of the body. Likewise, when the mind becomes angered, the body is the first thing to respond, which can cause the hands to clench into fists, blood-veins to become constricted and more visible, and facial appearances to change. While Berkeley would only go so far as to say that the mind is capable of perceiving an emotion of anger through visual perception, Descartes would likely go further than that and agree that the mind and the body, while separate, still communicate emotions in a very similar matter. Putting this into a context that contradicts monist thinking, without the soul, a body could not express anger. Similarly, without a body, a soul could not feel anger, meaning that emotions would not exist. However, because there is no way of doubting that emotions exist, the view of monism appears to be somewhat flawed. Meanwhile, dualism manages to support its arguments and by doing so proves that it is worthy of providing a logical answer to the mind-body

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    This belief in philosophy that the mind, soul, or conscious is independent from the body is referred to as Cartesian dualism; in other words, if the body dies the mind does not. Trying to distinct the mind from the body has been a topic in philosophy since Rene Descartes, one of the most influential founders. In one of Descartes first essays, the ‘Second Meditation: Of the Human Mind’, he wrote about how he believed that the mind and the body were two separate entities and self is distinct from the body. On the other hand, there are plenty of respected philosophers that believe Descartes’s look on our mind and body is wrong; these people call themselves Anti-Cartesians. Sir Peter Strawson, a very well-known Anti-Cartesian stated, the mind is…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Yet, Descartes’ duality theory also suggests that the mind is separate from the body. Thus, in that example, the brain would represent the body because the mind is a concept without substance or physical properties – it interacts causally with the body. Therefore, without the body, the mind cannot interact with the real world, experience the senses that cause stimuli, or conclude the thinking that confirms existence. However, with the body, the mind cannot trust its senses - the whole premise of the Dream Argument for Skepticism. Therefore, according to Descartes, the mind is unable to determine its existence with the body, but is also unable to determine its existence without the body.…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    “I think therefore I am,” the popular quote of philosopher Descartes, is the main premise of his theory of Mind-body Dualism. Interactionism is the theory that there are two realities, mind and body, each of which can have an effect on the other. In contrast, dualists claim that the mind and body are two separate realities. The body is a material thing that operates in a physical reality, while the mind and mental states operate in a nonphysical reality. For the dualist, the way of thinking is an internal thinking on the inside that is private.…

    • 1328 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Cartesian Dualism

    • 2454 Words
    • 10 Pages

    They assume that the soul/spirit can be located in a particular place (such as the pineal gland discussed earlier), to which Conway disagrees because “spirit is body and body is spirit.” Secondly, she argues that dualism only leads to mechanism because it has such a hard demarcation between the soul and the body, which entails the body to be some machine or tool that is not integrally associated with the body. Thirdly, Conway says that dualism cannot account for the interaction between mind and body regardless of what Descartes says about the mind-body union because dualists see mechanical motion as the only type of movement possible for material entities. Dualist philosophers seem to think that mind and body are defined by the exclusion of characteristics, as two things that do not have anything in common cannot influence each other. This argument fails to recognize the explicit interaction and communication between the two.…

    • 2454 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The concept of this mind/body problem has prompted many philosophers to create solutions, or drawn them to determine the problem does not exist. To this day, as artificial intelligence become increasingly common, and the question of how the mind relates to the body or if it even exists becomes pertinent in relation to technology, no consensus exists. Science fiction, such as the Star Trek: The Next Generation episode “The Measure of a Man”, often attempts to tackle this problem through their stories. The leaders of the two opposed parties, Picard and Maddox, both exhibit different views to the problem of mind/body. Picard argues in favor of the android, Data, being a sentient being with the same rights as other people.…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dualism vs Materialism The mind/body problem, the question of what is the relationship between the mind and the body, is commonly seen as a key issue in the philosophy of the mind (Sober, 2013, p. 204). The two categories of views discussed in Sober’s ‘Core Questions in Philosophy’ that attempt to resolve the mind/body problem are dualism and materialism. Dualism is the theory that the mind and the brain are two fundamentally different substances (Sober, 2013, p. 204). Conversely, materialism says that matter is the one and only fundamental substance in nature, and the notion that mental phenomena are a result of physical interactions follows (Sober, 2013, p. 204).…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As I was reading the many different tales in Oliver Sack’s book, I was amazed at the obscurity of each person’s case. With keeping the mind/body problem in mind while reading these tales, I was very conflicted on my position. When learning and reading about the mind/body problem in class, I really took to the monism perspectives. I believed that the mind and the nervous system are not different. I just did not understand how the mind could not be connected to the nervous system.…

    • 1544 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dualism Vs Physicalism

    • 1103 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The view of physicalism gives a stronger and more plausible answer to the mind-body problem. There are several reasons why this particular view gives a more sensible for answer to the problem at hand. These reasons include the rationale behind the reasoning of brain research, how the different aspects of reductive physicalism is able to address the non-physical aspects of the mind, as well as the less than sensible claims that the opposing view, dualism, presents in comparison. One of the main reasons why physicalism is able to prove itself to be the better answer to the mind-body problem is based off of research that society has learned about on the brain.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When talking about dualism in Philosophy of mind we recognize is the theory that the mental and the physical are in sense different from one another. John Searle is an American philosopher who states that there is no more a mind and body problem. He is careful to maintain that the domain of experience and understanding is autonomous. Meaning that it has no counterpart on microlevel. But as we already know not everyone thinks in the same way, like Renè Descartes who believed that the mind makes an effort to take control over the brain and is the principal seat of the soul and place where all of our thought are being formed.…

    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    First a dualist should not be afraid to accept the claim that person and body form a unity. Secondly they can learn how to think about mind-body interaction. Finally, “think of both person and body as having certain properties by virtue of the natural body of the soul and body” (Evans, p340). However, Evans believes that a dualist should not agree with everything that a non-materialist claims and…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rene Descartes Dualism

    • 1486 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Descartes’ metaphysical dualism; the notion that the universe is composed of both mind and body, which intermingle without a mediator, is as much a part of our intellectual heritage that those not trained in philosophy consider to be common sense. Mind and body dualism has become the very fabric of viewing ourselves in the universe, all the while prohibiting man from truly discovering the very essence of our nature. In doing so, dualisms have prohibited man from progressing in the conceptualization of our own conscious awareness of ourselves. Cartesian dualism divided the world into two detached domains, the world of the objective sphere of matter, which the realm of science dominates and the world of the subjective sphere of the mind, which religion has reign supreme for hundreds of years.…

    • 1486 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (Smart, 169) Heil mentions that Dualist philosophies are unappealing, they are contingent on correlations caused by causal interactions which seems implausible. Coupled with the idea that mind and body are distinct separate entities the model seems overly complex—therefore less plausible then Identity…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The argument in Descartes’ Sixth Meditation for the real distinction between the mind and the body ultimately secures his dualist position. Despite his argument appearing to make some mildly questionable leaps and seemingly ignore one potentially devastating point altogether, his position is clear and strong. I will begin by reconstructing Descartes’ argument, cover the grievances listed above, and then hope to argue that, despite these objections, Descartes’ position remains a sound metaphysical view. In the Sixth Meditation, Descartes begins by declaring that, firstly, all things one can clearly and distinctly perceive can be created by God, and secondly, if one can clearly and distinctly perceive one thing without calling to mind another,…

    • 1415 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Philosophy 001 Project 3: Descartes 1) Cartesian dualism refers to the philosophical view proposed by the French mathematician and philosopher Rene Descartes that describes and explains the relationship of the mind and body. According to this philosophical view, the Mind and the Body are two completely separate and different substances capable of interacting with one another. Descartes asserted that “[that is, [the] mind, by which I am what I am], is entirely and truly distinct from [the] body, and may exist without it.” (Descartes). Descartes described the mind as an immaterial substance whose “essence consists only in being a thinking thing [or a substance whose whole essence or nature is merely thinking]” (Descartes).…

    • 1742 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Like Ryle, Taylor’s argument is an attempt to demonstrate the ridiculousness of Descartes’ theory. Taylor claims that “all forms of dualism arise from the alleged disparity between persons and physical objects.” In this case, Taylor is correct, the majority of his essay goes on to address the differences between the “body and soul”, and as well as how the soul is logically flawed. The core of Taylor’s argument is on how the concept of the soul itself is far too ambiguous for it to be a worthwhile point to contemplate. This is because “there are no positive properties of any ‘soul’”.…

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays