Genghis Khan And The Making Of The Modern World By Jack Weatherford

Improved Essays
Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern World In “Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern World” written by Jack Weatherford, he paints a prettier picture of the Mongols than they are usually perceived. Instead of being terrifying conquerors, that are thirsty for riches and power, Weatherford depicts them as being emperors striving for power. The Mongols accepted a variety of religions in their empire. Religion was very important in that century; therefore, the Mongols were very open-minded to accept all religions. They are usually spoken of as violent people, who would attack and take what they want. The Mongols are described as very dangerous barbarians, but this seems to be different in the eyes of Jack Weatherford. If this is not …show more content…
Kahn’s fighting techniques of the Mongols were too advanced for their time. Some of their best strategies were the use of human shields, hostages, and psychological warfare. Before his components could even prepare, him and his army were already attacking on their horses and taking over their land. They had every good organization, and killed piece by piece. Some of the women, in the places that were being attacked, killed themselves before they were even captured. As for the people that were conquered, the saw Khan as a threat, but the Mongols saw Khan as a hero ("The Mongols in World History | Asia Topics in World History"). He didn’t kill everyone; the people who could have a positive impact in his empire, he brought back to the empire. He wasn’t very strict about who could live in his empire. He was very accepting of other religions; that mind set broug Khan did something that a lot of other kings had already tried. Khan decided that in order for such a large kingdom to be successful, there would have to be some sort of compromise with the citizens. This compromise was tolerance. Khan was very tolerant of different religions. He actually promoted the practice of other religions within the empire. He realized that stopping uprisings would not only come through separating the original “rebel rousers.” He realized that in order to prevent other uprisings and other rebellions, he …show more content…
Although Genghis Khan is talked about so negatively when being taught about history, he did many things that helped establish the European civilization. This book didn 't really change my perception of the Mongols. Before reading this book, I heard about the Mongols as being these dangerous people that people were terrified of, but I knew it had to be another side to the story. It was unnecessary for them to rape and torture the women from the lands they conquered, but it could have been a part of their scare tactic. I knew that they couldn 't have been as bad as everyone perceived them. If anyone becomes as accomplished as these people were, it was evident that they would be viewed

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Mongol Empire Dbq Essay

    • 1576 Words
    • 7 Pages

    ("A Tactic of Religious Tolerance"). In fact, clerics of many different faiths were even given tax benefits ("A Tactic of Religious Tolerance"). The Mongols were very benevolent and welcoming, seeing benefits within all religions and those who worshipped them (Nicholson 3,…

    • 1576 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Mongols had a very different approach to controlling their empire…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Mongols are barbaric because they are strategic, brutal, and they are conquers. The Mongols are barbaric because they are strategic with their plan of attack. In document 3 it states that “When they are to join battle, they draw all the battles lives just as they are (about) to fight.” They send people a group of people of other nationalities to meet with the enemy head-on and these people…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Also with all the land they owned how did they control it all and keep everyone doing what they're supposed to do.all the mongols did was kill everyone and not make peace with any other countries. Overall the mongols had positive and negative consequences from conquering so much land. But even today we still use things they use like hospitals and orphanages. And because of the mongolas we have cultural…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    With his extraordinary military accomplishments and leadership skills, Genghis Khan was a warrior and ruler who united all the nomadic tribes in the steppe of Mongolia and built the largest land empire in the world in the thirteenth century. He left a great legacy through his innovative ideas and laws whilst also promoting religious freedom, allowing an exchange of the global economy between Asia and Europe (Weatherford). However, with a belief that there should be only one ruler under the sky, Genghis Khan was unlikely to forgive those who refused to join forces with him and vanquished millions who wanted to create empires of their own. This presented an image of him and the Mongols as brutal savages who eliminated entire cultures, devastated…

    • 1724 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Mongols were people from Central Asia who came together to establish an empire which lasted from 1206 CE to 1368 CE. They were herdsmen and tradesmen who herded sheep and goats, and were nomadic people. Even though at first the Mongol community was small, they were able to expand by conquering China, Persia, and Russia. The Mongols were culturally destructive and constructive to a moderate extent in Persia during the 13th century because they positively influenced academics while they subjugated agriculture.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe that the Mongols were barbaric and very destructive and unforgiving people. Although they were barbaric, they united Eurasia and spread ideas and were very intelligent. One reason why they were barbaric is how they ruled in battle. While they were in battle, the Mongols had one person in charge of 10 warriors and then one person in charge of 10 of those groups of ten (100) and then ten of those ten (1000) and genghis would tell only a few people what to do and it would be a chain reaction of how the orders went around to everyone. If only a few people flee from battle out of a ten person group, the whole entire group is sIaughtered.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Mongol Empire is known for their barbaric ways like warfare and torture, which scared many people, they also made significant contributions to politics, economic development, and cultural diversity to many lands. Although the Mongols slaughtered entire cities and had rules that were barbaric, they were also in charge of trade routes, enforced important rules, had communication systems, and were religiously tolerant. The Mongols were somewhat barbaric because there were many parts of their civilization that were advanced. Documents 2,3,4,5 and 10 show how the Mongols were barbaric. In document two, it says that in battles, if one man ran away the whole group of men would be put to death.…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    DBQ On Modern Day Mongols

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Modern Day Mongols ~ The Mongols could be your worst nightmare destroying your village and killing all your family and friends or your best friend keeping you safe and making sure you had everything you needed but thats depending on whose side you were on. The Mongols were somewhat barbaric warriors that lived in the 13th century and took over most of Asia, The Middle East and Eastern Europe using barbaric Tactics. Even though the Mongols had barbaric tendencies they also protected their own. The Mongols were barbaric because they were an army that killed without remorse. They served the heads of the slain from their bodies and heaped them up in piles {Document 4}.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In essence, the Mongols were civilized and influential thorough Eurasia by enforcing their laws, recognizing and accepting different religions, and developing new…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Dbq Mongols Essay

    • 1957 Words
    • 8 Pages

    They killed everyone in towns, and razed and sacked as they went along, decimating anyone who dared try and oppose them. Take the battle at the Kalka river for example; in the year 1222, the Mongols crossed the Caucasus mountains to the Turkish Cuman territory, and after the Cumans, who were allied with the Russians numbering about 80,000 men, murdered the Mongol peace envoy, Genghis and his army or 40,00 utterly annihilated the Russian backed Cumans. Genghis’ utter disregard for human life, and his cunning and zeal as a military commander was just beginning to…

    • 1957 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the 13th century, a small tribe from the steppes of Central Asia had conquered most of the known world at the time. Mongols rode on the back of horses, as they swept most of Asia, the Middle East and Eastern Europe. It has never been seen before at the time, they had even taken over more land than Alexander the Great, the mongols taking 4,860,000 square miles of land. (Document 1). The mongols were fearless warriors who took over people's land yet they weren't as barbaric as they seem.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Genghis Khan Dbq

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Genghis Khan is often depicted as a barbarian and a bloodthirsty leader, bringing fear in every city he went, but people only focus on the negatives and don’t see that maybe he did more good than harm. Genghis Khan helped bring along the Mongol Peace, which lasted from the mid 1200s to the mid 1300s (The Mongol Conquests). During this time there was stability and law and order throughout the Empire. This of course led to more trade between Europe and Asia, which would help the Mongolian Empire to acquire more allies (Genghis Khan BBC Video). Without the Mongol Peace, wars could have been a lot more common and the Mongols would have been a lot weaker since they wouldn’t have had as much allies to help them out.…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    DBQ: How Barbaric were the "Barbarians"? Although Mongols were strikingly ruthless through their military tactics (Doc. 2, 3,4,5), they were able to develop a rather sophisticated society (Doc. 7, 9, 10) and executed noteworthy and structured accomplishments (Doc. 1, 6, 8). As shown in documents 2, 3, 4, and 5, the Mongolians are quite infamous for their questionable harshness considering their military techniques.…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The attitude toward Genghis Khan and his contribution of uniting tribes are generally good. Document 1 and 6 are in this category. Document 1 tell that Genghis Khan have ended the rebellion and fighting within the tribe, as his positive contribution. Document 6 is a painting of Genghis Khan.…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays