How did Genghis Khan use Legitimacy and Sanction to form a successful leadership for himself?
Genghis Khan was many things, but amongst being a father, husband and a brother, he was a military Leader. There is no doubt that Genghis Khan’s ways of leading were sufficient in the way his followers were loyal to him undyingly. He managed to take over a large number of territory all over China, and expanded his own dynasty a multitude more than it once was. Not only this, but he was able to bring China together as one, and to unify it, giving smaller tribes within Northeast Asia a chance to unite with him, and if they accept, proceeding to destroy them. He was kinder than Napoleon who killed everyone, whether they did something wrong or not. Genghis focused a lot on the loyalty of his people, and how many children he had to be his successors. He had many lovers, but his wife was the main one. He would not hesitate to put those who did him wrong to justice, and often enough the death penalty was the final consequence for those who broke his trust, and were seen as disloyal to him.
It is important for us to understand the way that Genghis lead over the Mongols-- the fact that the way he did so was much different in comparison to leaders such as Napoleon. For instance, it was apparent that from the beginning, Genghis Khan was very descendant-oriented, meaning that he wanted …show more content…
He was ambitious, and got what he wanted to be done done. He was relying on loyalty to get him through his ideas, and it worked. People respected him for who he was, and for what he had done. There was an aura of fear around him, but not a widespread fear. He respected his children more than your typical everyday man, and this worked out well for him in the long run as well. These are the main factors of Genghis Khan’s rule, and these are the reasons why his way of thinking was important to his plan in conjoining China in
Genghis Khan was many things, but amongst being a father, husband and a brother, he was a military Leader. There is no doubt that Genghis Khan’s ways of leading were sufficient in the way his followers were loyal to him undyingly. He managed to take over a large number of territory all over China, and expanded his own dynasty a multitude more than it once was. Not only this, but he was able to bring China together as one, and to unify it, giving smaller tribes within Northeast Asia a chance to unite with him, and if they accept, proceeding to destroy them. He was kinder than Napoleon who killed everyone, whether they did something wrong or not. Genghis focused a lot on the loyalty of his people, and how many children he had to be his successors. He had many lovers, but his wife was the main one. He would not hesitate to put those who did him wrong to justice, and often enough the death penalty was the final consequence for those who broke his trust, and were seen as disloyal to him.
It is important for us to understand the way that Genghis lead over the Mongols-- the fact that the way he did so was much different in comparison to leaders such as Napoleon. For instance, it was apparent that from the beginning, Genghis Khan was very descendant-oriented, meaning that he wanted …show more content…
He was ambitious, and got what he wanted to be done done. He was relying on loyalty to get him through his ideas, and it worked. People respected him for who he was, and for what he had done. There was an aura of fear around him, but not a widespread fear. He respected his children more than your typical everyday man, and this worked out well for him in the long run as well. These are the main factors of Genghis Khan’s rule, and these are the reasons why his way of thinking was important to his plan in conjoining China in