Those who are unaware of the hidden dangers of genetically modified organisms may believe it to be unimportant, as they have yet to see its' effects firsthand. Many consumers figure that it couldn't be terrible for you since it is allowed for consumption and has been for years. Although genetic modification is not a new concept, more and more hormones and pesticides are constantly being added at a parlous rate. There are several differences between the normal breeding process and the artificial genetic manipulation process. One key difference is the use of highly infectious viruses of artificial genetic manipulation as a promoter to witch on the introduced gene. Some of the viruses used are highly infectious. Genetic manipulation can increase the risk that the plant will develop toxic or allergy-causing compounds. Another possibility is that regulate exposure to foreign DNA and RNA material inserted into these artificial foods could cause allergic reactions or autoimmune disease. Despite the many petitions and appeals for state or federal regulations on labeling foods that contain GMOs, none has passed, meaning companies are not required to disclose whether or not a product includes genetically modified organisms. In addition to more than 60 countries requiring GMO labeling, many have banned GMOs altogether. GMO foods are either banned or severely limited …show more content…
Because it is a fairly new experiment, long-term effects are still unknown. To remedy this problem, many precautions can be made to prevent further harm to environmental and human health. The complexity of technology used in the process of genetic modification makes it difficult to properly research and regulate items. It is crucial that thorough research regarding their potentially hazardous effects is made before these products hit shelves for consumer purchase. By doing so, any associated problems can be monitored and adjusted before hitting the market. After foods are produced through genetic modification, rigorous testing should be performed to ensure they are safe for consumption by the population. The Food and Drug Administration can review and approve these products for the general public only if they meet the required provisions and safety protocols. Furthermore, all GMO products should wear explicit labels on their packaging to accurately inform consumers of their purchase. It is unethical to present a product to be something it is not, whether it be more or less of themselves. This translates into a common fallacy many marketers abide to called "cherry picking" (2). This deception is based on withholding information, sometimes critical, to persuade an audience toward it. In this case, producers fail to label their genetically modified products as