Genetic Fix Persuasive Essay

Improved Essays
The company Genetic Fix is under fire today, after their new product “Forever Fido” has killed more than 8 million dogs in the past 3 weeks. The company claimed the product allowed dogs to live forever. Instead the product has produced cancer in almost all of the dogs that have been inject with this product. The company is facing multiple lawsuits on top of complete shutdown by the federal government. CEO, Christopher Holland says “this was never the intention.” The Forever Fido injection works by altering the gene that controls aging. Doing this means the dog will never stop producing new cells after old ones die. In the cases of these dogs their cells zombified and built on top of one another and caused cancer within the major tissues of their body. Dogs with the injection that are not yet dead, are in critical condition and not expected to survive treatment. So far almost 8,500 more dogs have been either put down or have died, all in results from Forever Fido. …show more content…
Christopher Holland has already made statements about the lawsuits and is expected to comply one hundred percent. Holland said in an interview with reporter Paige Haddix, that his leading geneticists have been relieved of duty and are facing jail time. If these lawsuits file through then the company Genetic Fix could go bankrupt, and completely shutdown. The federal government is already expected to shut down Genetic Fix, bankrupt or not. President Donald Trump has releases a statement saying “ I will sign an executive order this week causing all privately owned genetic research labs and organizations to be shut down, effective immediately. Shutting down privately own labs only allows government funded organizations to carry out genetic research. Geneticist all over the country are protesting against the President's decision, all because of forever

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Gene Patent Michael Crichton in “Patenting Life” and John E. Calfee in “Decoding the Use of Gene Patent” discuss gene patent. Both agree that gene patent is overpriced, and research companies shouldn’t have the right to own patient’s tissues, but they disagree about the harmful of gene patents. Crichton and Calfee agree that the testing for different types of diseases are expensive. They also agree that no other companies are allowed to test because patent holders block any competitor's test. Crichton believes that it can be harmful because gene patent doesn’t allow other manufacturer to personalized suited to our particular body make up.…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ricki Lewis’s The Forever Fix: Gene Therapy and the Boy Who Saved It tells the tale of gene therapy’s rocky road from a wild idea people considered to be a “daydream” to a growing field providing lucky individuals with treatment to prevent their life-shattering genetic diseases. In her novel, Lewis discusses two major biological concepts: mutation and gene expression. To give the reader the molecular basis for genetic disorders, mutation is briefly addressed.…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The issue of patenting genes are discussed In “Patenting Life, “ by Michael Crichton and “Decoding the Use of Gene Patents” by John E. Calfee. Although the authors agree that gene testing can be overpriced, the authors have different views about whether or not gene patenting should’ve been granted. Crichton believes that gene patenting should have never been granted, since he believes they can be used to block innovation, and hurt patient care. He argues that gene patents are used to halt research and prevent medical testing.…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When it comes to talking about controversial topics such as politics or religion it is no surprise that people will not see eye to eye on the topic. Therefore, it’s no surprise that gene patenting, the act of patenting genes of DNA to be legally owned by private firms or universities, is also a controversial topic that others, including authors John E. Calfee and Michael Crichton seem to have different opinions on. Crichton, who is against the idea of gene patenting believes the research is harmful, while Calfee believes otherwise; stating there is something to gain from patents. In “Patenting Life”(441) written by Michael Crichton he discusses the cons to gene patenting and expresses his own disapproval toward the subject.…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Among the scientist there are no surveillance to make sure they are doing the right thing with the technology they are creating. Page 2 of intro, International Genetic technologies, inc did secret research when an accident occured twelve people or fewer where there to witness the accident and only a handful survived. “Biotechnology will transform every part of human…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nearly one-fifth of the human genome is privately owned (Crichton 441). Gene patenting is a relatively new concept and controversial one at that. Many scholars have very strong opinions on this topic, two of these scholars being: Harvard graduate and novelist Michael Crichton and a former resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) and staff economist John E. Calfee. Both scholars have written extremely compelling essays on the topic. Crichton’s essay “Patenting Life”, gives an overview of his adverse opinion towards gene patenting and provides evidence to support his opinion.…

    • 1121 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Listening for the Public Voice, by Robert Cook-Deegan and Jane Maienschein, discusses the issue of genetic engineering and the ethical dilemma and how the United States, government, and people are interacting in the struggle of the ethics behind genetic engineering. The authors present the facts that genetic engineering has laid in the grey area forever, and still continues to sit in that grey area. Genetic Engineering will occasionally find itself in the news and the argument reignites but falls flat within a couple of weeks waiting till the next breakthrough arises. Cook-Deegan and Maienschein stats some of the most recent progress in genetic engineering, which brings into perspective the relevance, development, and the possibility that soon…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Crichton V. Calfee: The Gene Patent Argument Michael Crichton and John E. Calfee both discuss the topic of gene patents in their respective articles, “Patenting Life” and “Decoding The Use Of Gene Patents.” However, the similarities end there as their opinions are the direct opposite of one another, with Crichton expressing extreme displeasure at the idea of gene patenting while Calfee is in support of the practice. Firstly, Crichton believes the patenting of genes as a whole to be a mistake. He believes the practice to be a result of the United States Patent Office (PTO) “[misinterpreting] previous Supreme Court rulings” (Crichton 441).…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This is becoming a real issue in America. Not only does this effect research on GM food, but it hurts all scientific disciplines as…

    • 2000 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One out of every four deaths in the U.S. is caused from cancer.(simple) Doctors and scientist have been looking for a cure for decades, but they have been neglecting the one right in front of them, genetic engineering. The next generation of this world could be called perfect with just a slight change in a baby’s DNA. No more sickness or deadly(adverb) disease will be in this world anymore because of this method. Genetic engineering should be morale and used in every child. There are more than 10 trillion cells in a human body.…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Brilliant Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Babies

    • 2056 Words
    • 9 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited

    Children affect the future and altering and correcting the genes of the child make these children different from the rest. Not only will this cause separation and individuality issues, however, this can also affect these genetically engineered children’s health, which may result in…

    • 2056 Words
    • 9 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited
    Brilliant Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal testing has been a part of our society since the early 1900s. And it appears to me, that not until around 40 years ago or so, people began to realize that testing animals was inhumane on many different levels. But because we are the human beings that we are, we still try to shy away from a lot of the negative consequences of animal testing. It is easier for us to push aside that which is bad and try only to look at the positive aspects. Yet, in my opinion, the cons outweigh the pros.…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is genetic testing? Genetic testing is a scientific and medical testing where scientists (change scientists to something else) identify for changes in a person’s genes, chromosomes or protein. It is considered when someone wants to identify health risks, allowing the doctor to make recommendations to their health and decrease their chance in developing the certain disease, or to test to see if the person has other genetic conditions, which would impact their chance of passing on or developing a genetic disorder. Though many positives may outweigh the negatives of genetic testing, does not mean the drawbacks of it should not be considered. When your results are concluded, it may emotionally affect you and your family.…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pro Gmo Persuasive Essay

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Every day young adults across the nation consume food purchased by their parents, lunches prepared by their school cafeterias, and meals from their favorite restaurants, and are unconcerned and unaware of the ingredients contained in food products, and furthermore do not partake in choosing what they consume. Unfortunately, teenagers are consuming Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) almost constantly, whether they realize it or not. GMOs first commercialized in 1994, are genetically engineered through a process which consists of inserting foreign DNA from bacteria, viruses, animals, and humans into their primary species, resulting in various unintentional health consequences (GMO Awareness). The plethora of unknown results stemming from this genetic modification process, raise the important question of whether GMOs are safe for humans. Without further action, the human population will remain endangered due to the negative health effects of the genetic modification process, and young adults will continue to be most susceptible to these threats because of their unfinished development.…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Future for Human Genetics People have been around long enough to know that everything changes (for the better or worse). Within the past few years, there has been a lot of debate over the scientific breakthrough of being able to modify the human genome. Many doctors and scientists have welcomed the idea with open minds while others are hesitant to become involved. Some see the dangers involved with the process while others see the endless possibilities coming out of this revolutionary discovery.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics