Genetic Engineering Our Offspring Essay

Improved Essays
Should humans be allowed to genetically engineer their offspring? Can you use genes from more than two people to create a baby? Can humans extract DNA from animals into their offspring? These questions are going to become very important shortly to the entire world. Genetically changing our offspring could change the world for the better or it could lead to our destruction. There are very few benefits that can come from this such as life expectancy and how intellectual the human brain can become. The downsides, however, include overpopulation on the Earth, a new type of discrimination, and the potential loss of genetic diversity. Genetically engineering our offspring could greatly affect future generations for many years, and should never be allowed for the sake of many generations to come. Changing the way we reproduce should never be able to happen because it could change a child’s appearance and personality, create a new way to discriminate against other people, and contribute to the loss of genetic diversity.
First, genetically altering our offspring would change their emotional, physical, and mental characteristics. Just by manipulating genes, this is all possible, but should it be done? Everyone would like for their child to be intellectual, good-looking, and athletic.
…show more content…
The gap between the social classes will grow even more rapidly with genetic engineering, “Not only would genetic enhancement take away from human dignity and even humanity itself,... it will become a ‘vain pursuit of perfection,’ causing a greater gap in society between the ‘haves’ and ‘have-nots’ or rather the ‘ideal’ and ‘non-ideal’ humans” (Annas). These enhancements in science would cause the social classes to separate farther and farther apart from each other. Sooner or later, the imperfect people would split from society. They would be disallowed to work because they are not fitted for the job because of their

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Altering the DNA of an embryo results in a loss of individuality for the child. According to Lovell-Badge of Francis Crick Institute of London, “‘It’s the thing that worries people the most, because it is felt to be unfair… It’s the same as using drugs to cheat,’” (Hamzelou). Once genetic editing becomes a social norm, making enhancements to a child will be second-nature.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If it's acceptable to modify one gene, why not two, or 20 or 200? At what point do children become artifacts designed to someone's specifications rather than members of a family to be nurtured? Given what we know about human nature, the development and commercial marketing of human genetic modification would likely spark a techno-eugenic rat-race. Even parents opposed to manipulating their children's genes would feel compelled to participate in this race, lest their offspring be left behind.”…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Trying to curb intelligence of past and future generations by scientific modifications has been prevalent since the eugenics movement of the early 20th century. This movement seeked to create a “master race” by improving genetic traits of humans through sterilization and selective breeding. There were laws set in place which forced people that were deemed “feeble minded” to be sterilized. These laws are long gone now as a result of a ban on sterilization laws from the United Nations in 1948 (Greenblatt). However, the thought of trying to control intelligence in people, whether to increase or prevent “dim witted minds” still remains in current thought.…

    • 1645 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The idea of natural selection and artificial selection can ruin the potential and equality of humans. The altering of humans is a very risky and problematic idea in society. Genes are supposed to be taken from both parent cells and not to specifically fit the ideal child. This would…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In contrast to Walter Glannon’s view that gene enhancement is morally objectionable, genetic enhancement, for the purposes of attaining a competitive advantage through increased potential in intelligence, athleticism, or attractiveness, etc. should not be viewed as morally illegitimate, because the consequences and intentions of gene enhancement can be morally justified through John Stuart Mill’s Principle of Utility and Emmanuel Kant’s Categorical Imperative. Walter Glannon argues four reasons as to why gene enhancement is “morally permissible if it is intended to ensure or restore normal functions, but is morally illegitimate if it is aimed at enhancing functions beyond normal.” However, gene enhancement is a simply one form of genetic alternation.…

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gattac Designer Babies

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages

    and that should take its natural course. Although there are exceptions in my opinion. This can advance the human race into a stronger race than before. I believe that genetic engineering should just be used for health improvement and body characteristics.…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This paper uses two main example which are very strong one is the “test tube” babies which were once looked down upon by society but now are widely accepted by the public. The other is heart transfusions which as Deegan-Cook and Maienshein wrote, “Initial revulsion at heart transplants gave way in the face of success” (Deegan-Cook, Maienshein, 1). Deegan-Cook and Maienshein used these example to warn the reader about what is currently going on with genetic engineering, and possibly genetic engineering could follow the same course the test tube babies and heart transfusions followed. This argument was effective but slightly deceiving. Original impression of the paper makes one think that the argument will argue for or against genetic engineering, but the true argument of the paper is about the public and how the public should decide “actively” as stated by Deegan-Cook and…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The introduction of a new idea is often met with risks and turmoil. These are unintended and unforeseen consequences that come inherent with the disruption of the status quo by an eager challenger. Whether or not this idea actually holds merit is irrelevant; what is important is that society possesses the necessary information to fully understand its potential impact, both now and into the future. Currently, this new attractive idea is genetic manipulation. On the surface, genetic engineering, or GE, offers tremendous opportunity for personal betterment – whether it is tweaking IQ, forging muscle, or building stamina, never has true biological perfection been so attainable as it is today.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the beginning of the 20th century, the human mind was much more inclined to search for scientific answers to society’s problems by perfecting the human race by applying the laws of genetic heredity. In 1883, Sir Francis Galton, a respected British scientist, first used the term Eugenics, “the study of all agencies under human control which can improve or impair the racial quality of future generations.” He believed that the human race could help direct its future by selectively breeding individuals who have “desired” traits. This idea appealed to many people, who thought that there was a “natural" way to bring about a utopian society just as nature “weeds out the unfit" among animals, so too should human society “weed out" its unfit members. In creating a world where human beings would be kind, intelligent, brave and honest…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Even though there may be no coercion and genetic modification becomes the free choice, still, people carry a burden. Also, regarding the strong determinism, even there are few cases that traits are weakly determined by genes, the science might ensure the probability of gene’s expression after the genetic engineering widespread. This is because organizations want to ensure the causation in order to acquire customers. Also, it is not true that parents will intensely love their children after accepting the fact that they cannot master their children. They spend lots of time and money on mutation, so at least, they feel some sense of expectation for children.…

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Case Against Perfection In order to cater an ever changing society, and as science continues to progress, many claim genetically modifying humanity is a no brainer. Though, Michael Sandel would heavily disagree, claiming, “Changing our nature to fit the world, rather than the other way around, is actually the deepest form of disempowerment. It distracts us from reflecting critically on the world, and deadens the impulse to social and political improvement,” (97). Instead of changing humanity, he proposes alterations to society, in order to custom nature.…

    • 1789 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Brilliant Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Babies

    • 2056 Words
    • 9 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited

    “Genetic engineering, if accepted, will have a negative impact on the society. It will result in increase of unreasonable fear or hatred towards foreigners or anyone who appears different. People with genetic defects will be socially rejected” (Buzzle.com, 2011, Pros para.7). The designer children will have to face the reality that they are not like every other child among them in the world and this may put a strain on both them and the other children. Designing children may also affect race and nationalities.…

    • 2056 Words
    • 9 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited
    Brilliant Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The program of genetic engineering in Lowry’s The Giver has common features like that of Brave New World but it takes a different course. In The Giver humans are genetically engineered to stop seeing differences and colors. The process of genetic engineering in this novel is made by genetic scientists who study human genes and attempt to eliminate differences or unique characteristics in these genes to make all people the same. The climate and topography are also scientifically controlled.…

    • 1740 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A genetically altered baby is something some people have only dreamed about, but now, it has become a reality. Scientist have discovered a way to alter human genetic traits and produce the perfect offspring. Some traits scientists have tried to alter include sex, eye color, and height, but it is still in the experimenting stage and should be possible within the next few years. Add more. Creating genetically altered babies should be prohibited.…

    • 1036 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The genetically designed will have the advantage in most situations such as sports, school, and life its self. The “normal” population will be the ones left behind trying the meet the same standards. Even if it is the next step for mankind, is it worth risking “playing God” (Long)? As Human genetic engineering continues to move forward, it will always bring the good and the bad along with it. It is up to us to choose to the risks or…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics