Genetic Engineering Persuasive Speech

Great Essays
Picture this: a world where everyone looks exactly the same--ridden with birth defects, religion has disappeared because people can control their environment with a simple insertion or deletion of a gene, and no one is sure of the future because every couple years, a virus that was supposed to harmlessly alter genes mutates to harmfully cause a deadly epidemic. Sound familiar? Maybe not yet, but at the rate we 're going, the world isn 't far away from the scenario just described due to the ever-increasing rate of genetic engineering occurring in today 's world. From genetically modified crops to mice that glow in the dark to bacteria that produce insulin, countless uses of genetic engineering have appeared in just a few short years, and without …show more content…
This is perhaps the biggest drawback of genetic engineering; using genetic engineering to create animals that only serve to benefit humans takes away their purpose in life and their ability to live their life the way they want to. Additionally, certain religious groups regard genetic engineering as 'playing God ' and frown upon it as degrading people 's religion. Some Christian denominations regard genetic engineering as meddling in God 's plan, and many of these forbid members from working on genetic engineering or using genetically modified medical treatments and foods. Genetic engineering in humans is especially frowned upon. Concerns about genetic engineering 's effects at the cellular level have led to uncertainties about using these processes on humans. Especially defined are the fear of increased birth defects, miscarriages, and stillbirths as a result of misperformed attempts at genetically engineering, leading to explicit restrictions regarding genetic modification of the human race. Even so, the idea of creating 'designer babies ' is still a popular one among the wealthy, raising more ethical concerns about the interference with the natural processes of fetal …show more content…
Although there are certainly advantages of genetic engineering, the risks far outweigh these benefits. Maybe the future described at the beginning of this paper isn 't far off. Maybe it is. Maybe concerns about the dangers of genetic engineering are totally unfounded. But, as they say, it 's better to be safe than

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Listening for the Public Voice, by Robert Cook-Deegan and Jane Maienschein, discusses the issue of genetic engineering and the ethical dilemma and how the United States, government, and people are interacting in the struggle of the ethics behind genetic engineering. The authors present the facts that genetic engineering has laid in the grey area forever, and still continues to sit in that grey area. Genetic Engineering will occasionally find itself in the news and the argument reignites but falls flat within a couple of weeks waiting till the next breakthrough arises. Cook-Deegan and Maienschein stats some of the most recent progress in genetic engineering, which brings into perspective the relevance, development, and the possibility that soon…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    SUMMARY/PRECIS Professor Ronald Green of Dartmouth University, in his article, Building Baby from Genes Up, addresses the topic of whether or not genetic engineering is a viable technological advancement for our society to pursue and argues that although there are many potential drawbacks, the overall benefits of genetic engineering outweigh its downfalls. He supports this claim by addressing the variety of benefits that genetic engineering can offer, then by categorically refuting counterarguments and finally by presenting his opinion for why each downfall of genetic engineering is surmountable. Green’s purpose is to shed light on both sides of the argument when it comes to genetic engineering, while posing the idea that genetic engineering…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Embryonic Stem cell research has killed many kids and more to come if we do not stop it. Stem cell research can be done with a stem cell from embryos, fetuses, and adult cells. The National Institutes of Health researched to see which would be easiest to use in laboratories. They found out that embryos would be the easiest because they will stay in a underfered state longer than the other cells will. Which means that they are not classified as any type of cell.…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First, the reason we should publicly fund the embryonic research is because we would be able to have a regulated research to prevent the worst. In a Vanderbilt article “Funding the Future: Embryonic Stem Cell Research” it says “the opportunity to clearly define regulations for ethical research”(Stan/2017/Vanderbilt/“Funding the Future: Embryonic Stem Cell Research”). This quote proves that the research can lead to health benefits. In an NPR article “Stem Cell Research: An NPR Special Report” it says “private sector research may lead to ethical abuses”(Arti K. RaI/2017/NPR/“Stem Cell Research: An NPR Special Report”). Shows that publicly funding it can prevent ethical abuses and the research can be regulated under the government’s watch.…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This paper uses two main example which are very strong one is the “test tube” babies which were once looked down upon by society but now are widely accepted by the public. The other is heart transfusions which as Deegan-Cook and Maienshein wrote, “Initial revulsion at heart transplants gave way in the face of success” (Deegan-Cook, Maienshein, 1). Deegan-Cook and Maienshein used these example to warn the reader about what is currently going on with genetic engineering, and possibly genetic engineering could follow the same course the test tube babies and heart transfusions followed. This argument was effective but slightly deceiving. Original impression of the paper makes one think that the argument will argue for or against genetic engineering, but the true argument of the paper is about the public and how the public should decide “actively” as stated by Deegan-Cook and…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Technology for genetic alteration is still in the process of development, meaning there is a major risk of fatality. The technology of this procedure could terminate the life of the embryo since there are still many unknowns. It could be decades before the process is perfected, and procedures done with this early technology are extremely risky. Additionally, doctors have to be very dexterous in order to perform this delicate procedure; if doctors are not careful during this procedure, it could prove tragic for the embryo and their family. The lionization of genetic engineering has belied its unethical effects on society.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The introduction of a new idea is often met with risks and turmoil. These are unintended and unforeseen consequences that come inherent with the disruption of the status quo by an eager challenger. Whether or not this idea actually holds merit is irrelevant; what is important is that society possesses the necessary information to fully understand its potential impact, both now and into the future. Currently, this new attractive idea is genetic manipulation. On the surface, genetic engineering, or GE, offers tremendous opportunity for personal betterment – whether it is tweaking IQ, forging muscle, or building stamina, never has true biological perfection been so attainable as it is today.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What if you had the choice to save an embryo would you do it if that meant you could have more than one child? Imagine you have a genetic disease and the only option to have children is using the in-vitro fertilization method. This means taking your viable embryos testing and choosing the one that is "healthy" without the disease to have a child while the others get disposed. But, what if you could save them by genetically modifying the DNA sequences using gene technology within the embryos to make it so that they no longer had the disease? Ronald M. Green the author of "Building Baby from the Genes Up” uses his experiences in biomedical ethics to tell his readers that the main reason as to why people are against genetic modifications is because…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The question of “designer babies” is one that is fairly recent and controversy of the topic starts from the very definition of the term. When one is presented with the term “designer babies”, Most people imagine a genetically engineered being who is less human and more technology. This false stigma mainly comes from the negative reputation of Genetically modified species such as food or animals. However, the reality is quite different, it can be argued that even choosing a fertilised cell as an embryo during IVF is a form of a designer baby. After conducting a questionnaire; 86.76% of people believed a “designer baby” was a being which was genetically engineered to have selective traits.…

    • 1614 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Brilliant Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Babies

    • 2056 Words
    • 9 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited

    The increase of knowledge regarding the topic altering genes has become rapid and have open and paved the hope of designing your own perfect baby. Even today, the use of reforming and adjusting the genes of an unborn child is being put in effect. “Techniques of genetic screening are already being used, whereby embryos can be selected by sex and checked for certain disease-bearing genes. This can lead to either the termination of a pregnancy, or if analyzed at a pre-implantation stage when using In Vitro Fertilization (IVF), can enable the pregnancy to be created using only non-disease bearing genes” (Steere, 2011, para. 6). Altering the babies genes can not only harm the baby, however, can also terminate the baby.…

    • 2056 Words
    • 9 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited
    Brilliant Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Human evolution took millions of years to develop our current species and to develop the technological sophistication we now have today. The possibilities of human advancement seem limitless and the only opposition we have is ourselves. Why should humanity limit itself over genetically modified organisms? Why do people think humans have gone to far on genetic engineering? Genetic modification is the process of altering the DNA in an organism’s genome.…

    • 2136 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Some believe that giving parents the option of genetically engineering their baby will result in eugenics driven by egoism. People might take advantage of germline manipulation by creating embryos that will be their own idea of what is perfect, thus objectifying and commodifying children. Some opposers even say that because these embryos will not have a say in whether they want to be modified or not, their rights will be taken away. Furthermore, regulating laws ensuring that genetic modification is used only for the correction of genuinely medical genetic conditions as opposed to enhancing a child’s appearance will be nearly impossible. Rich parents will use…

    • 1677 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Genetic Engineering Throughout history, humans experience many changes whether it is good or bad. Some of these changes can bring issues into the world. One of these “issues” that humans know today is genetic engineering. Genetic engineering is one of the well known creations known to man kind.…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Genetic and Biological engineering are just a few of the plethora of types of engineering that are rapidly evolving and expanding their horizons. Many advancements have been made in the field, and the community is divided when it comes to the issue of whether or not we should use such technology, or what the limits of the technology should be. It is imperative to find a solution to this issue or to create regulations, because everyone currently does not agree on what should be done about the issue, and this could very much morph into a dangerous situation. Many researchers and scientists use their research to formulate their opinions and to persuade the general public, while human rights activists use their beliefs, emotions, and possible scenarios to persuade others. Bioethicist Paul Root Wolfe is well-known as well as well-respected in his field, and he encourages the audience to consider bio-engineering along with its current uses through his TED talk, “It’s Time to Question Bio-Engineering”.…

    • 1660 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Genetic engineering in humans Imagine if you were to see a young, newlywed couple sitting down on their sofa and flicking through a catalogue, browsing at the variety of different options available, and daydreaming about all these different options that could potentially be a part of their future. Is this catalogue for houses? Or the latest and greatest furniture? No, this catalogue contains all the traits possibly available, phenotype and genotype that this couple wants their baby to have.…

    • 1353 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays

Related Topics