Why Is Genetic Engineering Bad

Great Essays
Everyone Can’t Be Super

Seeking perfection in an imperfect world has been a massive dilemma in today’s society. The rapid development of technology in this generation has created many new opportunities for genetic engineering. In California, a personal-genomics organization has been awarded a U.S. patent for techniques used in fertility clinics to create babies with selected traits. This human modification will lead to the controversial idea of designer children with artificial attributes. Altering natural-born feature with DNA is harmful, unethical, and detrimental to society because it is meddling with measures beyond our grasp.

"The prospect of real designer babies—where it would be possible to reliably choose cosmetic traits such as complexion and hair color or even physical characteristics such as athleticism—remains a distant one. But that day may be drawing closer, thanks to advances in genetic technology.”(Naik) Genetic engineering is becoming a more popular topic every year, but doctors and gene specialist should spend more time looking for cures to diseases; rather than pleasing the hunger of ungrateful and unsatisfied parents.

Playing God is a dangerous game that inevitably ends with a monster. If society eventually allows genetic
…show more content…
Designing the genes of humans to fix the birth defects and many detrimental diseases babies are born with would create a more stable and healthy society. This opportunity could be a huge and necessary technological breakthrough; however, the majority of people are misusing it in a harmful way. If there was a possibility of using genetic engineering for fixing health issues then that would be excellent, but most good things we suggest in society have their own downsides. Changing a child physically and mentally will diminish the value of talent and natural-born abilities. Genetic engineering would help to only a certain

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Is Human Cloning Possible

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages

    As Sagan illustrates in the article, “Human cloning possible but remains ‘abhorrent’ in minds of public”, “cloning could harm the babies created.” These babies could be affected by deformities or diseases. Having deformities and diseases means that the babies would suffer and not live very long. These babies are only alive because of our experiments. Due to being experiments, they would not be able to live a normal life because of their health problems. Instead of creating clones that have to experience the effects of the imperfections, scientists should focus more on improving the lives of people by using other ways that does not include ethics or does not cause harm to others.…

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In fact, they think it is a better option for children and their parents. They can choose an embryo that is not going to be affected by a certain gene and then their child will not have a specific disease, but that does not make up for the fact that one of the embryos just gets thrown away. Also when someone changes the genes to avoid a disease there is always a possibility that the gene pools gets messed up. Overall, there are more cons in the situation than pros and “designer babies” are not worth the risk. Some people are not able to have children for medical reasons so they have to look into In Vitro Fertilization for further help, but “designer babies” are going farther than that.…

    • 1505 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Gene Editing

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It is wrong for parents and scientists to play God, except in the instance it could save the child from suffering. Now that scientists have successfully modified human embryos, the debates is on if human germline editing, changing the genetic code of future descendants, is an ethical thing to do. People say it is unnatural, but so are antibiotics and modern medicine. Another argument against gene editing is that it is changing the next generation without their consent, which is an awful argument because they cannot consent if they do not exist. The more time…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Arguments have been made stating that cloning could save lives, but it would jeopardize many more than it would save the scientists from the article “The Cloning Debate. Should All Forms Of Human Cloning Be Banned?” State “Many experts say reproductive cloning is grossly unethical because it jeopardizes the health of would-be child clones. They note that efforts to clone sheep, pigs, goats and other animals yield few live births, and that many live-born mammal clones die within weeks or months because of abnormalities.” If humans were to reproduce through cloning we would have very little success and the children would not live for very long. Why…

    • 1745 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Genetic modification is the elimination of a certain gene containing undesirable trait and adding another gene containing the desired trait. The process includes getting the desirable material from a donor and not from the parents. Parents now can get all the characteristics they desire in their babies. They can also eliminate certain health problems the child might inherit from his/her parents. Genetic modification and manipulation has become a controversial topic since it has ethical and religious concerns.…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Vaccinations are a controversial issue in the United States because of the debate on whether or not they cause harm. The importance of communicating the benefits and risks of vaccines in today’s society is important. However, people who are against vaccines say that since many once dreaded fatal diseases have nearly disappeared from the United States, to vaccinate children against them is pointless. Continuing, childhood vaccinations provide reduced economic costs of diseases to parents. The growing concern parents have for vaccinating their children may result in making diseases more common.…

    • 1624 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Gene Therapy Cons

    • 2176 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Walters and Palmer believe that genetic treatment may be the only way to avoid many genetic disorders for some people. When an embryo undergoes germ-line therapy early enough, the embryo has a great potential to prevent irreparable damage to the developing embryo and thus be disease free. However, it then causes all cells of the embryo to be genetically modified. Germ-line therapy, as previously stated, prevents the transmission of genetic diseases through the generations, unlike somatic cell therapy. It is then more efficient to undergo germ-line therapy than somatic cell therapy.…

    • 2176 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Gene Doping In Spiderman

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The society will benefit from preventing harmful diseases but the health risks the research poses is huge. There has to be more research done by bioethicists and geneticists to determine if this is possible in the near future. CRISPR-Cas9 promises to remove the genes for obesity, Alzheimer’s but what is being neglected to mention is the process of how this research is obtained and the societal impacts. Creating super humans will lead to uniformity and lack of individuality within the society, everyone would aim to look a certain way, physically be a certain standard, have the same intelligence as others. It would be a tamer version of Brave New World, the people that cannot afford to have their genes edited would be treated as scum.…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Recently, there has been many cases about the altering of embryos during IVF. Not only is the altering of the DNA morally and ethically wrong, it is changing the baby in many different ways. Changing the makeup of an unborn child is highly advanced in technology, but just because it is possible to do doesn 't mean that it should be done. Technology has not progressed enough to determine what kind of consequences will be there when the baby is born if…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This could change the world for death would not be such a big of a loss anymore since family's could just have their loved one cloned and replaced. The clone would also be affected because who knows what could go wrong, but even if the clone turned out perfectly fine there would always be the overwhelming reality that they are a clone of another living person and people would probably treat and react differently to them. Then there are experiments such as new reproductive techniques like in vitro fertilization and artificial insemination, which have to deal with…

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays