Since 1978, when the first successful in vitro fertilization pregnancy took place, there have been numerous advancements in biomedical and genetic technologies. These technological advances have opened doors to things that were once considered the works of science fiction. From human cloning to altering gene sequences themselves, our total control over the future of our species is rapidly approaching. The question that many ask in the wake of such power being “Is this ethical?” Some people argue that gene alteration, in any way, shape or form defies natural selection and goes against our God’s plan for the civilization. While it’s true that genetic alteration harbors a potential threat to mankind’s moral values, and possibly, against nature itself; the argument that the benefits of possessing the power over individual traits and immunities is a rather intriguing concept. Alterations made to correct deformities or to prevent the terrible diseases such as Tay-Sachs syndrome will improve the overall quality of the human gene pool.
Today, gene alteration is still in its early stages, which means it is mainly used in experimental research. With its vast job field and impressive findings there is no doubt it will soon …show more content…
Our morals are victim to perspective which, in my view, is not a stable enough platform to build a case against a life-saving development. If God’s intention is to help us to make our world a better place, then, maybe potential betterment through gene therapy coupled with the gift of free will is a natural course that humans are supposed to take. In the end, depending on your views, only God will know what action or non-action we should have taken. In the interim, a saved life through perceived immoral science, I believe, is better than a lost life in the name of
Today, gene alteration is still in its early stages, which means it is mainly used in experimental research. With its vast job field and impressive findings there is no doubt it will soon …show more content…
Our morals are victim to perspective which, in my view, is not a stable enough platform to build a case against a life-saving development. If God’s intention is to help us to make our world a better place, then, maybe potential betterment through gene therapy coupled with the gift of free will is a natural course that humans are supposed to take. In the end, depending on your views, only God will know what action or non-action we should have taken. In the interim, a saved life through perceived immoral science, I believe, is better than a lost life in the name of